Bongbong: Marcos would have turned PHL into ‘another Singapore’

[cherie]

---

nayabag man intawn ni si Bongbong Marcos. 20 years nga presidente iya papa wala mahimong Singapore ang Pilipinas. gipalagput sa mga tawo mo ingun na dayon nga mo asenso ang unta ang pilipinas. sa mailad lang.

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

nabuhi man lage ko diri...naka anhi na ba ka singapore boss? or naka suway naka ug gawas sa pinas?

kanang sip-on mag mask maski sa japan naa mn na...labi na nga mag winter didto sip-onon gyud ka.

strikto ang tanang balaod labe na sa mga highly developed countries...mas disiplinado pa gani ang mga tawo sa japan kaysa diri sa singapore...

uu naka anha nako... lol.. nice place...disiplinado kaayo ang mga taw except sa pipila ka mga indiano...

pero kung imo huna-hunaon mutyabaw gyud maayo ang atong mga human rights activists...

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

LOL. have you been to Singapore and stayed here even for a couple of months? i don't think so kay murag wa ka kasabot why 'stricto' sila even sa mga gamayng butang..

singapore's being strict (or too strict) shows that ila gi ampingan ilang ug country...murag balay ni nila nga dli dapat hugaw hugawan...

dili pwede mag bubble gum? not entirely true at all. naa man silay baligya ana dire, but you have to dispose it properly (e.g. labay basurahan or butang balik sa wrapper before labay sa trash bins; dili pina Pinoy luwa ang inusap nga chewing gum bisan asa sa dalan or worse, ipapilit ilawm lingkuranan or sa table)...

kung gisip-on dapat mag mask? natural. gusto ka gi flu imong kaila nya mu atsi duol nimu, it's either mapiskan kas sipon ug laway wa pay labot sa sakit, ganahan ka ana? sa kadaghan ug airborne diseases nowadays, for sure u won't allow yourself be infected too, dba? think about it.



see this quote itself? it's like you're saying that Filipinos kay gahi ug ulo in general, di ganahan bawal, gusto 'freedom' maskin wala nas lugar..

IMO, regardless pa ug kinsay magpuli puli presidente sa atong nasud, useless ra ghapon. why blame kung kinsay galingkod ug nagpadagan sa atong nasod? why always blame politicians nga nangurakot?

we as common citizens of our country are also to be blamed. naa tay balaod dba, though how crappy they implement it but kita mismo reklamador man kaau..kanang attitude nga 'ka gamay ra anang butanga' mao nay usa sa naka pa bringdown sa atoa...if mu complain tas even sa pinakagamay nga penalty, how much more kung stiffer penalties dba? kung naay bill nga i-pass or even under proposal lang (nya mu-leak sa media-w/c is also a big problem sa atong country; grabe mu sensationalize sa issues), basta feel dli kauyon nga wala pa gani ma implement, rally2 dayon...sobrahan ka-advance mag huna huna, puro negativities, and it's pulling our country down...gigamit pa lang ng 'advanced nga panghuna huna' sa pagpaningkamot kaysa mag rally, wa hibaw-i guro mu asenso pa ta ug hinay hinay...

ambot, daghan pa kaau naa sa akong utok about ani nga issue and kapoy na pd type (hehe) kay magkatay katay na, but i think para mu asenso ta as a person or as a country, dapat give-and-take unta ang relationship, meaning dapat we should also do our part as citizens (COOPERATION). sure, we can always say that kurakot atong gobyerno and ato balaod way klaro, but naka ask ba ta sa atong self pd if ni cooperate ba ta sa atong mga balaod, unsaon pag nindot sa atong systema if kita mismo kay reklamador ra pd kaau?

just my two cents..peace all!

i like topics like these, makes my mind work...!!

yeah naka anha nako pero dili sad bulan...

i dont think you see my point although i agree with you...

reklamador ra kaayo ang mga filipino para maparehas ta sa singapore mao na ako point...

ako pasabot dili ta mabuhi ug "soft authoritarian state"

we are not willing to give up a bit of our freedom.. mao mana point Lee kwan yew sa usa niya ka interview sa TIMES magazine man tingali to...

Lee Kuan Yew: The man who saw it all - TIME

[rare_phoenix]

OT: We are good on pointing out the wrong doings of others but we don't even give attention to our shortcomings. We need to start the change in our own home.

Ont: It could have been like that, we could have been bigger than Singapore but the late president and his cronies became abusive. Our country have a lot of potentials but even us don't make use of it in a good way. We deserve what we are today.

[nightzlayer]

bro O.T man ka pls respect this thread.....

[peewee_toot]

mahitabo ra ni if naay iron fist ang atong leader...

[darkdevil]

mahitabo ra ni if naay iron fist ang atong leader...

Murag impossible sad lagi... Kay kung naay iron fist tapos i strict daghan dayon mo welga... Sugod dayon og people power... perti na raba ka abuso

[mlhl@7]

jun current top singles. Sasuke dating sim. Is brett michales dating jess still. Hornymatches com adult personals. Free adult dating saintomen on answerbag.com. Get information and videos on middle aged women including articles on womens. Usually, by the time middle age women turn , their career is on set and forget, problems associated with middle aged women starting with menopause. Meet gay men for

spammer...

[burn777]

Murag impossible sad lagi... Kay kung naay iron fist tapos i strict daghan dayon mo welga... Sugod dayon og people power... perti na raba ka abuso

agree.

welga2x dayon.

wa gani kasulbad sa iyang kaugalingon problema samot pa kaha sa whole nation.

[pepponeskie]

On Target
Marcos would have succeeded if… by Ramon Tulfo

I AND many others of the “baby boomer” generation who are not leftist would have agreed with Sen. Bongbong Marcos that the country would have become another Singapore under his father had he added the big “If.”

If his mother Imelda and her relatives were out of the picture, the country would have been “great again” as Ferdinand Marcos had promised after he was elected president in 1965.

If Marcos didn’t set up his own oligarchy composed of Imelda’s relatives and his cronies, the country would have become another Singapore.

If he was only as honest and sincere as Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew, this country would have become as progressive and corruption-free as the city-state.

If Marcos wasn’t only a henpecked husband to his wife Imelda, things would have turned out differently.

The elder Marcos’ “New Society” movement was very good for the country if it had been pursued in earnest.

The first two years of martial law was life-changing and exhilarating for many Filipinos.

We lined up for rides, whereas before we scrambled and elbowed one another to get into buses and jeepneys.

We threw garbage in receptacles, whereas before we threw garbage everywhere.

We obeyed traffic rules because cops carried out laws to the letter, scared of being arrested by the watchdog military.

People could walk the streets unafraid of being held up or accosted by criminals.

The drug problem was practically nonexistent during the first few months after the declaration of martial law as the notorious drug lord, Lim Seng, was executed in public.

There were far fewer abusive cops than there are now in the first two years of martial law because policemen were afraid of the military.

Abusive military men were dealt with severely by military courts.

There was less corruption, if any, because government officials and employees were scared.

True, there was no freedom of the press and of speech as newspapers, radio and television stations were shut down, but there was little graft and corruption to report.

Foreign capitalists started coming in because martial law paved the way for a good business climate.

The first two years under martial law were the golden years of the Marcos administration.

But then, to use Marcos’ own words, there was “backsliding to the old ways.”

When a patient suffers a relapse, he becomes sicker than before.

The same with Marcos’ martial law regime when the country became a “basket case” among all the countries in Southeast Asia.


* * *

I was a columnist of the Manila Bulletin from 1982 up to 1987 when I transferred to the Inquirer.

When I wrote about abuses committed by military personnel and policemen in my column during that time, punishment from the authorities was swift.

President Marcos himself relieved the entire complement of the Manila Police Station 5 in Ermita, from the commander to the lowest patrolman, after I wrote that most of the cops in the station were engaged in a protection racket.

From where I stood as a columnist, Marcos personally attended to reports of abuses committed by soldiers and cops.

That’s why I was flabbergasted when Marcos’ successor, Cory Aquino, cared little about abuses committed by soldiers and cops.

The Mendiola Massacre during Tita Cory’s time was an example of soldiers and cops shooting down unarmed civilians.


source: Marcos would have succeeded if… - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos