Prostitution To Be Legalized...Pabor ba mo?

[pijavier]

---

PRO prostitution d ay ka bro giddyboy.

Ok ra bro, you are entitled to your opinion. pasensyahi lang akong pagka old school ky ari gihapon ko sa love.

pero lahio ra gyud ang condom bro. bwahahahaha. ang condom para dili manganak dili para dili magka AIDS. mao sad na ako pasabot ato.

[BoyasBabis]

it's better to legalize. even if we illegalize it, still the prostitution is there. but i'm not in favor of prostitution.

[giddyboy]

I did not say so..

aw, sorry i misinterpreted your post...

anyways, let's analyze a Phil. setting:

let's say i am the Cebu City Mayor and also a Catholic. when asked if pabor ba ko sa legalized prostitution? i will say NO!
and asked, "why sir?", i will answer, "it's not because i'm a Catholic but it is for the best interest of the public".

coz before i say that, in my brain, will process my Catholic morals which says it's immoral. but as a politician, i have to be discreet in showing my religious beliefs. My political perspective also says the same, coz if i favor it, ihawon ko sa Catholic church ug sa mga kadaghanan natong Katoliko ug conservatives nga nibotar kanako. My liberal perspective says that ok man sab unta ba, pero in this case, this is insignifant for the decision to make.

now all of that constitutes my personal morality on this issue as a mayor that says NO...

[giddyboy]

PRO prostitution d ay ka bro giddyboy.

Ok ra bro, you are entitled to your opinion. pasensyahi lang akong pagka old school ky ari gihapon ko sa love.

pero lahio ra gyud ang condom bro. bwahahahaha. ang condom para dili manganak dili para dili magka AIDS. mao sad na ako pasabot ato.

im not PRO-prostitution. don't get me wrong. LOLZ

[giddyboy]

this may be the case because it has been socially acceptable but on a personal level, no wife would want to share her husband with somebody else, much more to a prostitute.

but asking to why a wife, or a live-in partner to consent her companion to prostitution, isn't that a personal level?

i do not have any contention with the morality issue and and it's perspectives.
i am simply trying to point out from your post that your example is flawed.
tell me, by any chance is that from a psychological perspective's point of view?

well, my dear, perspectives are what constitutes a person's morality and it will never leave the equation of any morality issues.

flawed or not... mao btaw nang perspective, is perceiving. makiglalis ka sa wikipedia & the scientists? naa ra nimo.

here it is ay:

Neuroscientific and psychiatric perspectives

Mirror-neurons

Research on mirror neurons, since their discovery in 1996, suggests that they may have a strong role to play in empathy. Social neuroscientist Jean Decety thinks that the ability to recognize and vicariously experience what another creature is undergoing was a key step forward in the evolution of social behavior, and ultimately, morality.The inability to feel empathy is one of the defining characteristic of psychopathy, and this would appear to lend support to Decety's view.

Psychological perspectives

Morality as maladaptive and universal

Phil Roberts, Jr. has offered a perspective in which morality, and specifically the capacity for guilt, is viewed as a maladaptive byproduct of the evolution of rationality:

Guilt is a maladaptive manifestation of our need to justify our existence, in this case by conforming to a shared subconscious theory of rationality in which 'being rational' is simply a matter of 'being objective', as exemplified in the moral maxim, 'Love (intrinsically value) your neighbor as you love (intrinsically value) yourself'. Although none of us can actually measure up to this standard, we nonetheless come to experience feelings of worthlessness (guilt) along with a corresponding reduction in the will to survive (depression) when we deviate from the standard to an unreasonable degree. In other words, a capacity for guilt (having a conscience) is a part of the price we humans have had to pay for having become a little too objective (too rational) for our own good.

you referring to yourself, giddyboy?

you're out of the line here...don't get me wrong...LOLZ

[pijavier]

im not PRO-prostitution. don't get me wrong. LOLZ

aws unsa ba. maka libog na kini. be be be, mag roll call ta usab, all pro prostitution, aise your hands...

[giddyboy]

aws unsa ba. maka libog na kini. be be be, mag roll call ta usab, all pro prostitution, raise your hands...

ngano malibog man ka?
beh, beh, beh...ngano moingon man ka nga dili ka pabor?

di ba niingon ka nga based sa imohang Catholic faith, immoral na cya, di ba?

now i will add some assumptions. maybe in ur political perspective, of course, dili sab, di ba?
now how about your neuro-scientific, psychiatric perspective? dili sab ky basin naa kay empathy towards prostitutes. and also your psychological perspective might tell u that u will have guilt feelings if u pay for ***. and if u have a radical feminist view, u may be against all forms of prostitution.

NOW all in all, those perspectives of yours constitute your personal morality that says you are against prostitution...

lisod ba diay ni sabton?

[pijavier]

ngano malibog man ka?
beh, beh, beh...ngano moingon man ka nga dili ka pabor?

di ba niingon ka nga based sa imohang Catholic faith, immoral na cya, di ba? and maybe in ur political perspective, of course, dili sab, di ba?
now how about your neuro-scientific, psychiatric perspective? dili sab ky naa kay empathy towards prostitutes. and also your psychological perspective tells u that u will have guilt feelings if u pay for ***. and if u have a radical feminist view, u are against all forms of prostitution.

NOW all in all, those perspectives of yours constitute your personal morality that says you are against prostitution...

lisod ba diay ni sabton?

Wow men...... There is to much generalization of your interpretation to my commentation.

Grabe ka deep bro. wahahahahaha. me no G.

My bottomline is, I am not pro-prostitution and will never agree to it being lagalized.
It just brings in too much problems. The economic growth that it brings with all the foreigners coming to our country will never make up for the damage that prostitution brings.

I empathize for those who are in the trade yes. But i also know they have a brain and that if they choose to look for a job, outside prostitution, they can.

Tinapolan lang sad ky easy money man gud ang mamaligya og karne.

Now, I don't know where you've come up with the theory about my psychological perspective that my guilt bugs me when i pay for *** because I don't.

Simply because I have never come up to a prostitute and ask for ***. Contented kau
mas naka ila paka nako bro, hehehehe, peace bro...

I do not have a radical feminist view but just most of the people I love or close to my heart are women.

so once again, aginst ko sa pag legalize sa prostitution.

[maia21]

but asking to why a wife, or a live-in partner to consent her companion to prostitution, isn't that a personal level?

what the.. you lost me. did you get what i mean by personal level? i meant personal level of a wife.

flawed or not... mao btaw nang perspective, is perceiving. makiglalis ka sa wikipedia & the scientists? naa ra nimo.

i wasn't and i don't intend to. it was your own post that i was trying to clarify.

you're out of the line here...don't get me wrong...LOLZ

are we on the same channel? same frequency? same wavelength?
i don't know if you understand my posts, or if you even understand yours.

[giddyboy]

@pijavier:

HAHAHA. that's more like it...

sa akoang example nimo bro, that was only an assumption...coz i don't know u personally and we haven't met face to face, or even became friends (but maybe on istorya...hehe)

AND that is how to analyze one's personal morality, not only thru a person's religion perspective, which is kulang....

if your conscience tells you that there is no guilt if mangabang ka...so be it, but im pretty sure your catholic perspective gyud ang mangibabaw sa tanan.