US forces 'ready to strike Syria'

[Passport]

---

apil ra ba akong ig-agaw ani... US army man siya. Akong auntie sige yaw2x facebook nga nahadlok na siya para iyang anak.

murag dili man mag una ang army ani kay missile strikes ra man ni..

[tamse]

murag dili man mag una ang army ani kay missile strikes ra man ni..

pero gipa ready naman daw sila. mao na hadlok akong auntie. ga ampo nga di madayon

[Passport]

pero gipa ready naman daw sila. mao na hadlok akong auntie. ga ampo nga di madayon

dili man kaha imo auntie ang ipadala...hehehe.. they are well trained.. army pa. basin rangers gani to or green beret.. ampo lang ta..

[godwhacker]

President Bashar Assad says Syria has agreed to surrender its chemical weapons | CTV News

Dude, even Russia already agrees Assad was responsible for the chemical attacks. Assad agreed to submitting its stockpile to the international community.

Dude, where did you get this information that Russia agreed Assad was responsible for the chemical attacks? palihug kuno ug link dude kay morag na overdose ka sa western mainstream media... lols.

And Assad saying the U.S.'s saber-rattling didn't influence it to come to terms is BS, otherwise it wouldn't make a condition to submit to international pressure IF the U.S. drops its posture. If the U.S. never made the threat, nobody would have cared, because Russia is the side here that had the largest stake here (and wouldn't have cared as long as Assad routs the rebels), and the U.N. is a useless organization.

Call it bullshit or whatever but the fact is Assad is winning on the ground and he is doing smart moves. to win a war it doesn't matter kinsang pinuti kosug motingog sa sakuban...

Assad saying it was Russia's diplomacy that urged him to submit is laughable. It wouldn't have to submit if it wasn't for the U.S. threat of intervention, Assad is trying to make Putin seem like a hero, when the question in focus should be why Putin continues to support a regime who has been proven to have chemical weapons, when as a big international player, it should have condemned it in the first place.

laugh 'til you drop...putin is doing some smart moves as well...look who appears now in the international community as the guy who is on the right side of history -it's putin my dear... lols... who gave saddam the chemical weapons that gassed innocent lives during his war with Iran? of course its the US of A...lols... now, why would putin condemn syria for possessing such weapons?

dude it's not the question of who owns wmd but who started gassing innocent people using such weapons...

[tamse]

dili man kaha imo auntie ang ipadala...hehehe.. they are well trained.. army pa. basin rangers gani to or green beret.. ampo lang ta..

di oi! amew.... hahha... ka arte ato niya. ai maski pa oi, ma unsa palang to.

[æRLO]

Dude, where did you get this information that Russia agreed Assad was responsible for the chemical attacks? palihug kuno ug link dude kay morag na overdose ka sa western mainstream media... lols.



Call it bullshit or whatever but the fact is Assad is winning on the ground and he is doing smart moves. to win a war it doesn't matter kinsang pinuti kosug motingog sa sakuban...



laugh 'til you drop...putin is doing some smart moves as well...look who appears now in the international community as the guy who is on the right side of history -it's putin my dear... lols... who gave saddam the chemical weapons that gassed innocent lives during his war with Iran? of course its the US of A...lols... now, why would putin condemn syria for possessing such weapons?

dude it's not the question of who owns wmd but who started gassing innocent people using such weapons...

The fact that Syria was not a signatory of the Chemical weapons convention at the time but had chemical weapons at the same time is the smoking gun. Aside from the Kremlin's accusation that it was the rebels' who are responsible for the attack, and the debunked "evidence" from youtube--they have no proof that it was the rebels.

Where did I say Russia was responsible? I pointed out that Russia is the one who has dabbled its hand deep into this situation, way before this chemical attack had occurred, by supplying Assad.

Yeah, Putin is definitely on the right side of history...in the eyes of the sheep. He's no pacifist, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. He has much to gain from Assad keeping power and at the same time much to gain from this war. He is the ultimate opportunist.

oh yeah:

Elite Syrian Unit Scatters Chemical Arms Stockpile - WSJ.com

[silentnuker]

Originally Posted by Passport
murag dili man mag una ang army ani kay missile strikes ra man ni..


--> pero gipa ready naman daw sila. mao na hadlok akong auntie. ga ampo nga di madayon

unsa may point nga m0-join kas army unya d ka ready to serve your country in battle?
soldiers wh0 are sent t0 war are perfectly aware there's a possibility of them returning
via a coffin wrapped in a national flag no matter how well trained/experienced they are
or no matter how well-equipped they with cutting-edge weaponry.

maypa wa na lng ni-j0in...

you should als0 consider...war is a real possibility...it could n0t be tom0rr0w, next m0nth or next year...but wars d0 happen...it has been happening since ancient times and will c0ntinue t0 happen
until the end of this age.

[silentnuker]

The fact that Syria was not a signatory of the Chemical weapons convention at the time but had chemical weapons at the same time is the smoking gun. Aside from the Kremlin's accusation that it was the rebels' who are responsible for the attack, and the debunked "evidence" from youtube--they have no proof that it was the rebels.

Where did I say Russia was responsible? I pointed out that Russia is the one who has dabbled its hand deep into this situation, way before this chemical attack had occurred, by supplying Assad.

Yeah, Putin is definitely on the right side of history...in the eyes of the sheep. He's no pacifist, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. He has much to gain from Assad keeping power and at the same time much to gain from this war. He is the ultimate opportunist.

oh yeah:

Elite Syrian Unit Scatters Chemical Arms Stockpile - WSJ.com

well, both US and Russia are just protecting their interests...b0th of them have the same c0l0r...hahaha.

look at China...staying calm in all this heat...im n0t saying they are g00d...l0l.

[pak88]

Russia has $20 billion in investments in addition to billions more in arms sales sa Syria so it would be in their best interests to preserve the peace. Its not like they are acting out of the goodness of their hearts because wala man na inana si Putin, being ex-KGB and all.

Anyway, its good news for everyone that the U.S. military strikes has been averted, except if you're living in Syria. This will prolong the civil war there and cost thousands more in human lives.

[godwhacker]

The fact that Syria was not a signatory of the Chemical weapons convention at the time but had chemical weapons at the same time is the smoking gun.

so just because they have in possession of the chemical weapons and not a signatory to it was enough for you to conclude that they gassed their own people while the UN chemical inspectors are on site investigating prior incidents of chemical usage. dude, kataw-anan man ni imong logic. as what one syrian general commented earlier, why use chemicals when they can do it with air power which they can use legally? and besides, ug naduwa pa ni sa basketball, ang kontra gibyaan nas puntos.

Aside from the Kremlin's accusation that it was the rebels' who are responsible for the attack, and the debunked "evidence" from youtube--they have no proof that it was the rebels.

ahh... here is your smoking gun dude, youtube my ass...ayg palabi anang youtube... you may find out someday you are losing your sanity because of too much western media.

Where did I say Russia was responsible? I pointed out that Russia is the one who has dabbled its hand deep into this situation, way before this chemical attack had occurred, by supplying Assad.

go back read your original post... i wanted a link from you that says russia agreed syria was responsible for the chemical attacks. nahadiin diin nalang ko ug daghang sites but i never heard russia agreed on this. ayaw gani i misled ang mga readers dire dude kay mora na ka ana ug taga CNN... and may i correct your notion that russia is to blame for this because of its full support on syria. dude, russia is following the international law in honoring contracts with syria in delivering russian made weapons.

Yeah, Putin is definitely on the right side of history...in the eyes of the sheep. He's no pacifist, and anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool. He has much to gain from Assad keeping power and at the same time much to gain from this war. He is the ultimate opportunist.

and you want me to believe obama is the peace keeper? lols...

Moscow Confronts Washington: Obama is “Losing the Battle to Destroy the Syrian Government