MERGED: Cebu BRT (Bus Rapid Transit)

[Unlicensed Dreamer]

---

hehe cool ka lng boss kay storya ra ni ato-a

asa nga road widening imu pasabot? tan-awn natu kung na-widen ba jd ang dalan?

Wa ka kita sa USC Talamban? Giguba na gane apil ang gate para maka accomodate ug laing 2 lanes.

[Lee Nann]

Correct and for demo:

Mao ni BRT nga muagi sa Jones Ave.. imagina nalang nga Cebu Jones ave na

nganung kaha naa juy musupak ani noh? kanindot ani, nya ang mga drivers dli na mulabad ang ulo kay walay trapik.

[salbahis]

hehe afford ra kayu na sa pinas uy

ang sa ako lang ba why not approve first the budget for the train para mahinay-hinayan na siyag implement bahalag dugay, then ang BRT na dayun next i-approve nya ang planning teams for both systems kay mag-converge to an idea on how to implement both without affecting each other or perhaps one system will benefit the other

kay kung unahon man gd ni nila ang bus ang tendency ani in the future mag-implement na sad para sa train which will cost more na nuon

of course daku2 jd siya nga trabahuon peru may nalng gisugdan kaysa wala jd hehe

its not a question wether we can afford it or not, of course we can afford it... the question is the implementation.. kung asa ang mas practical ug dali ma implement... last time i check trains requires track and tracks requires to constructed ahead before the trains can run.... if i remember when naa ko manila nagpuyo before (late 80's) thats the time when they started expanding LRT wala pay mrt that time... and that time Meralco pa ang operator sa LRT manila is not that congested yet... so wala kaayo problema.. now moving forward to MRT when they constructed grabe kaayo ang ka hasssle while construction sa tracks and thats couple of years...

even manila is considering BRT kay mas practical ug economical sya... why go for headache when you can have peace of mind... so impractical ra ang MRT sa cebu... too many at stakes... while ang BRT is just drive and go..

[Cebu Real Estates]

nakabantay ko, taga adlaw naay nay gilihok sa cebu. like sa kanang kanal. taga adlaw, new places.

haha. unsa kaha sa after 5 years from now.

[H.Wolowitz]

its not a question wether we can afford it or not, of course we can afford it... the question is the implementation.. kung asa ang mas practical ug dali ma implement... last time i check trains requires track and tracks requires to constructed ahead before the trains can run.... if i remember when naa ko manila nagpuyo before (late 80's) thats the time when they started expanding LRT wala pay mrt that time... and that time Meralco pa ang operator sa LRT manila is not that congested yet... so wala kaayo problema.. now moving forward to MRT when they constructed grabe kaayo ang ka hasssle while construction sa tracks and thats couple of years...

even manila is considering BRT kay mas practical ug economical sya... why go for headache when you can have peace of mind... so impractical ra ang MRT sa cebu... too many at stakes... while ang BRT is just drive and go..

hehe mao gani sugdan na dayun samtang dili pa in-ana kasamok ang cebu just like what u'v said they did for LRT in the 80's sa manila

kay kung dili sugdan karon aw maparehas na nya ta ani ka-hassle sa MRT construction years from now just like what u've said (again) hehe

imoha ra gitagaan ug example akong point boss. salamat!

[H.Wolowitz]

Wa ka kita sa USC Talamban? Giguba na gane apil ang gate para maka accomodate ug laing 2 lanes.

hehe kana dha boss kay 1 lane ra ang mapuno after ug guba sa koral, ug dili mn na widening para sa brt, hagbay ra na nga dapat gi-widen dha nya nagpa-gahi lng ang mga pare hehe karon ra sila ni-give in kay nakita na nila ang resulta sa ilang kagahig ulo

anyway, sige lets say nga gi-widen na dha para sa brt, sure ka nga dha jd dapita mag-congest ang traffic inig implement sa brt? hehe

[salbahis]

hehe mao gani sugdan na dayun samtang dili pa in-ana kasamok ang cebu just like what u'v said they did for LRT in the 80's sa manila

kay kung dili sugdan karon aw maparehas na nya ta ani ka-hassle sa MRT construction years from now just like what u've said (again) hehe

imoha ra gitagaan ug example akong point boss. salamat!

why wait for the infrastructure that takes years to build, if you can immediately implement the plan within few months?

[H.Wolowitz]

why wait for the infrastructure that takes years to build, if you can immediately implement the plan within few months?

why wait for years before building the infra when you can build it now at the same time implement another plan (brt) within the next few months?

[gshukaku]

paminaw nako bro mura ug impractical pa kaau kung unahon ang LRT...mas dali ang BRT kay dedicated road ug station ra ang buhaton...kay sa LRT nga need paka ug dako nga power supply, mga riles ug mga underground station.

[salbahis]

why wait for years before building the infra when you can build it now at the same time implement another plan (brt) within the next few months?

ok... there is no end here... you seem to fell inlove with MRT chuva-ekek... dont know your reason is... but heres my parting words... "IMPRACTICAL"...

end of my opinion about this matter since we are not really going nowhere with our discussions...