I disagree.
2-3 days stay in Cebu is enough for me,
More that is stressful.
I disagree.
2-3 days stay in Cebu is enough for me,
More that is stressful.
basis nila is, heritage, infrastructure ug uban pa..
we must be proud of Cebu to rank no.1, visited Davao before but still Cebu has plenty to offer...
in terms of security murag disagree mn ko. anyway, proud to be sugboanon.
mao rani ang nka top nato.
1. doul ra ang mga beaches...wala ni sa manila...
2. cost of living sad.
3. dli pa kaayo crowded og dghan kasuroyan...
if its only competetion is manila ila e contra ug uban na medyo un urbanized... aw no doubt cebu.. paet sa manila gasto nya heavy traffic, davao unta just because its in mindanao its economy is hurt because of its location other than that nindot bya gyud ang davao
This is the worst assessment ever. The panelist only consider heritage, infrastructure and etc as the factor on this assessment. Just because a city that is rich in historic buildings doesn't mean this city is a "livable city". Lapu2x shrine and "wonderful" beaches won't help its citizens if most of them are underemployed if not jobless.
Why didn't they include jobs, economic stability, affordable houses, crime rate, access to hospitals, affordable education as factors for this assessment. That's how you figure out as to who are really those LIVABLE CITIES. Is Cebu still tbe he number 1 if we add these factors?? Hmm...
I agree,
You don't have to worry about muslim extremist sort of thing in Cebu,
My worries if I live in Cebu is only if my favorite NBA basketball team would loss.
Cebu is now a copycat to Manila. The traffic, baha, crime rate og uban pa. Gamay nalang para mo tupong siguro
Similar Threads |
|