i have yet to meet a person who haven't sinned.. that should be interesting.
on the first paragraph, yes.. because it served their interests better... and to continue that,, there are people who stopped them because it served thier best interest to stop those guys from killing others... its in the best interest of the robber to steal, and it is also in the best interest of the police to prevent crime.. its just a matter of conflicts of interests..
on the second paragraph.. hmm.. i dont think thats how those guys think... if i were hitler.. i wouldnt see any point in killing the jews.. i prefer making them slaves and working the to death.. thats more productive.. regarding maguindanao.. if i wer ampatuan.. i should have given the victims police escort.. so that there will be no blame placed on me... those guys are just merely acting on impulse... without much thinking and deliberations.. a wise person would know when, how, and where to inflict necessary "evil"..
i quite dont understand your third paragraph.. if i was not mistaken.. it was a preacher who claimed that their was too much evil in haiti so god sent an earthquake... regarding god commanding genocide, its in your bible.. kindly look for it... i personally have nothing against genocide or saving them.. if they dont serve my interests. in has nothing to do with me..
the crusades,jihad, inquisition, witch hunts, are nothing more than political events but covered up by religion.. there is no such thing as absolute righteousness.. only self-righteousness... biased perspectives..
i believe morality is subjective. who are we to say killing a pig is right? who are we to say killing another person is wrong? we cannot say a murder of a pig is wrong because we consume the meat. much like to say as we cannot say that killing a person is right either, because that is a conscious being with a "soul" as what many of you admit. what's the difference with the two? the difference is that we can "benefit" from the former and "sin" with the latter. who invented "sin"?
We? you take away the subjectivity of morality if you use the word "we". "we" pertains to the general populace therefore, you are not referring to an individual capable of seeing what is RIGHT or WRONG to him, but rather, you're setting a definition of what is right or wrong based on what is acceptable or not. that is objective morality, not subjective. of course, murdering another individual is wrong---but that doesn't mean it's wrong for each individual, whether we like it or not.
ever heard of Jim Jones?
MILF wants an independent Mindanao apart from Philippines that's why until now the war is on. not that the government is corrupt maong makig-away sila. if so, why will they attack civilians too? most especially non-muslims. i had one of my relatives killed because of ambush. they should have focused in Metro Manila too, coz that's where the seat of the national government is.
the MILF wants an independent Muslim nation. mao di nila hilabtan ang mga muslim, ang mga non-Muslim pamatyon. before a war is raged in mindanao there is always a warning sa mga fellow muslims para safe sila.
regarding the forum topic, yes, we are all sinners. we all fall short in the eyes of God, or kung wa man gani ka nagtuo og God, we fall short of the law. like for example as simple as jaywalking. the city has put up ordinances nga adto jud sa mga saktong dapit mutabok, but for convenience mag jaywalk jud. edi naka sala na ka. rules are set for peace and order.
Similar Threads |
|