Page 1732 of 1835 FirstFirst ... 172217291730173117321733173417351742 ... LastLast
Results 17,311 to 17,320 of 18341
  1. #17311

    Quote Originally Posted by obelisk View Post
    Basin nalimtan nimo na ang pag serbisyo nya sa publiko ug sa pag tabang sa nasod nato ang rason nanu ning support ko niya. Dili na ning support ko niya kay bastos siya ug baba.
    Para nimo sayop man kaha ang usa ka presidenti sa nasud nga manghinambog sa iyang dakong OT!N ug mosulti sa iyang pagFINGER sa iyang yaya sa publiko?

    Unya tungod lang kay feel nimo nga nakatabang siya sa nasud, magpatig-UYON na lang ka sa iyang gipangbuhat maski SUPAK sa imong set of principles ug nagdala kini og kaulawan sa tibuok nasud ug sa tanang pilipino?

    Bisan unsaon pa nimo'g sugarcoat, bradier, HYPOCRISY gyud ang tawag ana.

  2. #17312
    Quote Originally Posted by obelisk View Post
    if ingon ana akong amahan, dili nako siya ibatikos. Unsay mabuhat ana? Supporta gihapon ko niya bilang usa ka amahan.
    Dako kaayo ang maayong mabuhat ana. By telling him nga makauulaw iyang gihimo, malikay siya ug ang imong pamilya sa future embarassments.

    Pero dili na nimo masabtan kun kunsintidor kang pagkatawo.

    Kanang mga klaseha sa tawo kusog kaayong moreact kun sa ila na buhaton pero kun sila mobuhat, justified pirmi maski unjustifiable

  3. #17313
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Lol, tanan diay nimo conclusions walay basehan. Ni-form kag opinion about me without actually backreading. Just like firestarter, you are a threadcrapper.
    hahaha.. nangluod pa diay gihapon ka maam? .. ok..

    Unsa diay imong gipaglaban diri?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by obelisk View Post
    Nag ingon ko dili pwde ang amahan ang ibatikos? Please ayaw pag himox2 ug imuhang conclusion. Ka klaro anang gi question nako nanu ang presidente ra dyod imung gi batikos. Ikaw ang selective ug gipang batikos. Dili ako.

    Imuha nang concepto na dapat ang presidente perpetko. Backread nlng ang rason ning supporta ko niya.

    Since ako raman sad sigeg tubag sa pangutana nimo, and dili man ka mu tubag sa pangutana nako. If ingon ana akong amahan, dili nako siya ibatikos. Unsay mabuhat ana? Supporta gihapon ko niya bilang usa ka amahan. Dili ko mag hope na mawala sya sa position.

    Balikon nako, so kay para nimo kay amahan man sya so siya ang i.batikos, so imung amahan sad ang ibatikos namo kay tungod maau ra ka mang troll?



    Palehog nlng ko back read sa imung post. If naa ba kay post dri na nag defend sa president. Wala koy oras mag backread sa imung ad hominem and sarcasm nimo against ni @firestarter or karun sa ako. Pero I rest my case. Seems to me na mas offensive ka dyod keysa sa DDS diri.




    Bisan unsaon nimo ug gamit anang mga nindot na terms, dili gihapon mu gawas na valid imung point. Again, nothing will please you. If naay tattoo kay syndicato, if wala, kay gi erase. If wala kay mas solid na rebuttal on that tattoo, pwde ra mu switch ug lain topic.
    Forever blocked/ignore nana nakong usa kay dili gyud na mo straight talk..

    Ang kaning usa partial ignore.. Tubagon sa nato, kay basin ni naug na gamay iyang pangluod.

  4. #17314
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Ignore lang sad ko ‘bradier’ if wala gihapon ni improve imong intellectual discourse. I dont mind, no interest in your threadcrapping
    You are questioning my intelligence diay? Aw wala tay mahimo ana. Mas bright gyud ka maam.

    Hangtud karon you are scorned pa?

    To get back on topic.

    Unsay pwede nato ma discussan diri kaha? ...

    Post a topic nga tanaw nimo worth the intellectual masturbation?

  5. #17315
    Quote Originally Posted by boss_digong View Post
    Para nimo sayop man kaha ang usa ka presidenti sa nasud nga manghinambog sa iyang dakong OT!N ug mosulti sa iyang pagFINGER sa iyang yaya sa publiko?

    Unya tungod lang kay feel nimo nga nakatabang siya sa nasud, magpatig-UYON na lang ka sa iyang gipangbuhat maski SUPAK sa imong set of principles ug nagdala kini og kaulawan sa tibuok nasud ug sa tanang pilipino?

    Bisan unsaon pa nimo'g sugarcoat, bradier, HYPOCRISY gyud ang tawag ana.

    Dako kaayo ang maayong mabuhat ana. By telling him nga makauulaw iyang gihimo, malikay siya ug ang imong pamilya sa future embarassments.

    Pero dili na nimo masabtan kun kunsintidor kang pagkatawo.

    Kanang mga klaseha sa tawo kusog kaayong moreact kun sa ila na buhaton pero kun sila mobuhat, justified pirmi maski unjustifiable
    Asa lagi gihapon ang hypocrisy ana? Ako lng hatagan tika ug definition sa hypocrisy "Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, while concealing real character or inclinations, especially with respect to religious and moral beliefs; hence, in a general sense, hypocrisy may involve dissimulation, pretense, or a sham."

    Hypocrito na d.i ron ang wala nag batikos or nag call out sa usa ka tao na sayop siya? Ayaw balik balika ang sayop na definition sa hypocrisy. Nag dayg d.i ko sa gi buhat niya? Wala. Ayaw tawn ipagawas na ning supporta ko sa gipangsulti niya.

    And since klaro man kaau na dili nimo tubagon akong mga pangutana human ko nimo gi call out, klaro kaau na pinili ra dyod imung tubag. Wala na gani kay tubag about sa tattoo. I rest my case.

    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Lol, tanan diay nimo conclusions walay basehan. Ni-form kag opinion about me without actually backreading. Just like firestarter, you are a threadcrapper.
    Clarify nako if imung pasabot kay "tanan" or "mostly"? Kay if tanan, then dili d.i to tinuod na fresh new account ka and feb 2019 pa ka nag sign up? And obviously resorting to ad hominem only shows unsa dyod ka.

    OnT: High ratings nsd. With social media nag sibya sa other side sa news, dili lng pang daot tanan. Mas daghan na options dyod ang mga tao na mu gather ug information. Dili ra biased dyod.

  6. #17316
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Unless you answer my bulleted points saona, dili na ko mo engage nimo ‘bradier’. Alkanse ko, bayad ka per post. Sayang ako oras
    Ipost daw balik maam, kay dili na nako makita imong bulleted posts maam.


    ------

    Grabiha anang bayad per posts oe.. hahaha..

    #sarcasm .. Daghan2x na baya akong posts diri datu nako ani..

    -----

    By the way maam, if you thought of me that way, how would I know that you are not a paid troll of the other party?

    By the way si Binay man to imong gi vote before no?

  7. #17317
    C.I.A. firestarter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    3,395
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Dili lang ko ‘bradier’. Ikaw lang pangita. Kusuga manugo sa paid troll intawn.
    Luoran pud nimo maam oe.

    .....



    Poverty incidence at three-year low


    posted April 11, 2019 at 01:45 am by Julito G. Rada and Nat Mariano


    Poverty incidence among Filipinos declined by 6.6 percentage points to 21 percent in the first half of 2018 from the adjusted 27.6 percent during the first half of 2015, the Philippine Statistics Authority said Wednesday.
    Poverty incidence refers to the proportion of the population living below the poverty line to the total population. The figures were contained in the preliminary report of the Family Income and Expenditure Survey, or FIES, for 2018 released by the PSA.
    Also, poverty incidence among Filipino families in the first semester of 2018 was estimated at 16.1 percent. This is defined as the proportion of families whose income is below the poverty line to the total number of families. This was estimated at 22.2 percent in the same period in 2015.
    Socioeconomic Planning Secretary Ernesto Pernia, in a statement delivered by National Economic and Development Authority Undersecretary Adoracion Navarro, said the decline in poverty incidence could be attributed to “sustained economic growth and critical and broad-based reforms and investments that have translated to employment generation and social protection.”
    “Over the course of three years, we can see that poverty decreased substantially—down by 6.6 percentage points...,” Pernia said. Pernia is currently representing the country at the IMF-World Bank Spring Meetings in Washington D.C.
    “For one, growth in the construction and manufacturing sectors created more employment opportunities for Filipinos. Second, we like to highlight the increase in income of Filipino households, as well as employment shifts to the industry and service sectors from agriculture,” Pernia said.
    He said while inflation rose to 8.1 percent in the period of 2015-2018 from 7.8 percent in 2012-2015, the growth of average income accelerated considerably to 21.2 percent from 15.3 percent, respectively.
    Importantly, he said growth in per capita income of the bottom 30 percent of households picked up significantly to 29.2 percent in the 2015-2018 period from only 20.6 percent in the 2012-2015 period.
    “We note that the top contributor to the strong income growth for the poorest 30 percent of households was an increase in wage and salary incomes. A far second and third were domestic cash receipts/support (including from government) and entrepreneurial activities,” Pernia said.
    He said this was an indication that the pace (average of 6.5 percent GDP growth in 2012-201, the quality and consistency of economic growth over the past seven years continued to benefit the poor.
    “In particular, the growing contribution of industry, particularly construction and manufacturing, to output and employment, are creating more income-earning opportunities that are accessible to the poor,” he said.
    He said the implementation, expansion and enhancement of government’s social programs have also helped augment incomes.
    One of these is the continued implementation of the Conditional Cash Transfer Program, which now includes an additional P600-rice subsidy cash grant. Moreover, the P1,000-pension increase from the Social Security System, which was released in March 2017, added to Filipinos’ incomes.
    The coverage of the Social Pension program widened to over 3.1 million in 2018 from only 930,000 indigent senior beneficiaries in 2015.
    Also, the roll-out of Unconditional Cash Transfers or UCT of P2,400 per household likely boosted domestic cash receipts of the poor, he said. The UCT Program was released in early 2018 to cushion vulnerable groups from the transitory effects of the tax reform law.
    As a result of these social programs and policies, subsistence incidence also declined by 4.5 percentage points to 8.5 percent among individuals and declined by 3.7 percentage points to 6.2 percent among families in the first semester of 2018.
    Subsistence incidence refers to Filipinos living in extreme poverty and who cannot afford basic food requirements.
    Moreover, the reduction in poverty is fairly broad-based. Regional disparity eased as all regions, except the National Capital Region, saw a drop in poverty incidence. Eight regions recorded poverty incidence below the national average, four of which posted a single-digit poverty incidence.
    “While these initial results are encouraging, we have yet to wait for full-year results of the FIES, as targets in the Philippine Development Plan (PDP) 2017-2022 are based on full-year estimates,” Pernia said.
    But Pernia said much has to be done to sustain the decline of poverty incidence in the country. Among these are the implementation of policies that will help stabilize prices, such as the Rice Liberalization Law, while giving farmers technical support through the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund or RCEF.
    He said there must also be more opportunities for entrepreneurship, job creation, and sustainable livelihoods for our low-skilled labor force.
    Pernia said the peace-building efforts, especially in the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, must be sustained to encourage economic growth.
    “Lastly, we are continuing the push for reforms that facilitate the creation of new businesses and boost the outputs of firms, which will eventually translate to high-productivity jobs,” he said.
    These are the reduction of foreign investment restrictions and the package 2 of the Tax Reform Program, which will lower corporate taxes and rationalize investment incentives.
    Earlier, President Rodrigo Duterte said he was eyeing to reduce the poverty rate in the country to 14 percent by the time he ends his term in 2022.
    “It’s a reasonable expectation that we are on track to meet targets,” said NEDA Undersecretary Carlos Bernardo Abad Santos.
    Dominguez previously said the government must lift at least 1 million Filipinos from poverty every year in order to meet the 14 percent poverty incidence target at the end of President Duterte’s term.
    Viewing the latest figures as “good news,” the Palace remains convinced that the decline in poverty incidence only proves the accomplishments made under the Duterte administration.
    “These figures highlight that the Duterte administration has made significant strides and reflect how it seriously deals with the long-standing national issue of poverty,” Presidential Spokesman Salvador Panelo said in a statement.
    Panelo said Duterte’s initiatives have helped reduced poverty incidence by broadening access to free education, free medicine, improved healthcare facilities, and institutional school feeding program for public school children.
    Higher pension for seniors and veterans, salary increases for soldiers, policemen, firemen, teachers, and government workers also played a factor.
    Meanwhile, a Trade official said the price of rice should go down in May under the new liberalized setup.
    The price of rice should go down to P32 per kilo from P39 while sugar prices should stay at P50 to P55 per kilo, Trade Undersecretary Ruth Castelo said.

    Kumbati China...


    PH takes a swipe at China


    Slams ‘assault on sovereignty’ as Chinese vessels swarm WPS
    posted April 11, 2019 at 02:00 am by Nathaniel Mariano and Rey E. Requejo
    While the Philippines remains on friendly terms with China, the government will continue to assert the country’s sovereignty if it comes under attack, the Palace said Wednesday, even as Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin declared that the West Philippine Sea “is ours” and that Beijing just took it.
    READ: DFA fires off ‘salvo of diplomatic notes’ vs China boats in WPS
    PH takes a swipe at China
    PROTECTING THE TAWILIS. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Calabarzon is urging the public to report establishments and restaurants selling tawilis during the closed season—March 1 until April 30. Sardinella tawilis, a freshwater sardine found exclusively in the Philippines, is the only member of the genus Sardinella known to exist entirely in fresh water. DENR Photo
    The Palace on Wednesday made clear that China “has no business” in posting hundreds of ships near Pag-asa Island, and that doing so would be viewed as an assault on Philippine sovereignty.
    In a Palace briefing, Panelo said the Philippines is considering filing a second protest.
    Meanwhile, reports said that Chinese vessels have also been near the islands of Kota (Loaita) and Panata (Lankiam Cay).
    Authorities said they have monitored several Chinese vessels, believed to be maritime militia, in the West Philippine Sea last March 28.
    “They cannot be intruding in our territorial property,” Panelo said.
    The Palace official said the Chinese vessels should “go away.”
    “While we remain friendly with respect to trade relations, we will always assert sovereignty when it is being impaired or assaulted,” he said.
    Asked if the Palace views Beijing-registered ships in the West Philippine Sea as an “assault” to Philippine sovereignty, Panelo said: “Oh, it is.”
    “If they continue to be present in our territory, then it is an assault on our sovereignty,” he added.
    Last week, President Rodrigo Duterte “advised” the Chinese government to lay off Pag-asa Island, noting that once China “touches” the Philippine-occupied territory, “things would be different.”
    READ: ‘Uphold PH sovereignty’
    The Palace said a note verbale was on its way to Beijing since last week. However, the Palace has not heard yet from the military and the DFA whether the Chinese government has responded to the diplomatic protest.
    “We will give them reasonable time to respond to our protest,” he said.
    Locsin, meanwhile, said Chinese actions in the West Philippine Sea was “clear evidence” of its power in the South China Sea.
    “The stand is that it is ours. And they took it. World’s highest court ruled that. Period,” Locsin said, in his Twitter account.
    “Now the question is how to take it back,” the country’s top diplomat added.
    China has rejected a United Nations-backed arbitral tribunal’s ruling that invalidated its sweeping 9-dash line claim over the South China Sea.
    The government has been raising its concerns over China’s activities in the South China Sea, particularly the building of military structures in the disputed maritime territories.
    Duterte admitted that the Philippines could not afford to go to war against China, but Locsin said he has “no fear of war.”
    “One attack on a public vessel triggers World War 3 with the USofA which is impervious to attack from Asia,” he warned. Locsin noted that the Philippines could not defend its maritime territory before because former US President Barack Obama “was in love with China” and told Beijing it was “okay to take what it wants from the Philippines.”
    Manila and Washington are bound by a Mutual Defense Treaty.
    However, the US role in the Philippines’ dispute with China over the South China Sea remains vague.
    Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana has sought a review of the MDT because under the US interpretation, the treaty covers only “metropolitan” Philippines and does not include the Filipino-occupied areas in the South China Sea.

  8. #17318
    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Dili ni personal ‘bradier,’ i just really dont like paid trolls.
    just like you

  9. #17319
    Quote Originally Posted by Panasonic View Post
    Ignoring your ad hominem, so basically wala kay nabuhat ato ila time? Wa kay pulos sa Pinas pud atong time nila? Mo criticise ka namo nga ni voice out ra mi sa amo opinions nga ikaw mismo way pulos?
    Pagka pisu pagyud tawn ug paminsar. Wa gyud nakasabot sa iyang gibasa.

    Imong gustong tubag man gud sa unsay nabuhat kay pag atake ug pag sabwag ug propaganda sa goberno. Mao nay imong gibuhat karon. nya naa nakay lupos ana dayon?? hahaa utok aktibista

  10. #17320
    Quote Originally Posted by obelisk View Post
    "Hypocrisy is the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, while concealing real character or inclinations, especially with respect to religious and moral beliefs; hence, in a general sense, hypocrisy may involve dissimulation, pretense, or a sham."
    DISSIMULATION. PRETENSE. SHAM.

    Di ba mao nay inyong gibuhat mga DDS?

    Tan-awa ang mga meaning ana sa dictionary.

    Quote Originally Posted by obelisk View Post
    Hypocrito na d.i ron ang wala nag batikos or nag call out sa usa ka tao na sayop siya? Ayaw balik balika ang sayop na definition sa hypocrisy.
    HYPOKRITO gyud kay NAGPATOO GUD KA nga SUPAK kas pagbinastos ni Duterte sa iyang mga public speeches PERO bisan gamay nga pagsupak dili gyud makita o mabati gikan nimo.

    Kalimot ka's definition nga imong gihatag? PRETENSE, SHAM, DISSIMULATION.

    Maayo pa'y moangkon na lang ka nga niuyon, giganahan ug na-inspired ka adtong iyang pen!s grabbing ug finger!ng yaya speeches kay matanggal pa ng tanang bahid sa maong hypocrisy. Hehehehe.


    Quote Originally Posted by obelisk View Post
    And since klaro man kaau na dili nimo tubagon akong mga pangutana human ko nimo gi call out, klaro kaau na pinili ra dyod imung tubag. Wala na gani kay tubag about sa tattoo. I rest my case.
    Unsa guy wala?

    Kapila na nako gibalik-balik nga:

    Kung dunay nakita nga tattoo sa likod ni Bong Go PERO wala mo match sa SPECIFIC alphanumeric code nga gilink sa iyaha, klaro na kaayo nga BAKAK tong mga alegasyon nga leader siya sa drug syndicate.

    APAN DILI NA MAOY NAHITABO.

    Nakita sa likod ni Go ang mga iniresan sa usa ka ka tattoo. Unya naa pud video last year diin nagbasketball siya ug nakita ang part sa maong tattoo.

    Kun kadtong gi-erase nga tattoo wala'y alpha numeric code or naa pero dili match sa code nga gi-reveal ni Bikoy, NGANONG IYA MAN TONG GI-ERASE NGA MAO MAN UNTA TO PINAKALIG-ONG EBIDENSYA NGA BAKAK ANG GISULTI NI BIKOY?

    'I rest my case' sa imong kagaral. Ingna nuon nangita lang ka'g graceful exit kay na-corner na ug wala na'y tarong matubag.

  11.    Advertisement

Similar Threads

 
  1. All about the Goodness of WebXpress
    By iLoveWebX4ever in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-10-2012, 05:02 AM
  2. ~All about GEARS OF WAR!~
    By obemon in forum Software & Games (Old)
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 07-16-2008, 11:47 AM
  3. ~All About AGE OF EMPIRES!~
    By a0201 in forum Software & Games (Old)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-30-2007, 06:50 AM
  4. Replies: 110
    Last Post: 06-22-2007, 10:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top