sigma17-70 users pls post here

[michaelocana]

---

hehehe if i know master sige kag tayhop ana bahhhhh

Nindot ang Sikma Bro kay naay automatic blower inig-shoot nimo. Swerte lang nag-short siya... hehe

[wildfuzz]

Nindot ang Sikma Bro kay naay automatic blower inig-shoot nimo. Swerte lang nag-short siya... hehe

hahahhha..hmppp convince ko ug samot dah ky naa d i ni blower.hehehehe

[chiuandy76]

Yes bro. The tamron is a bit sharper than the sigma. But dili kaayo na mumatter especially if you get a very good copy of the sigma. Though the tamron has a larger max apperture @ 2.8 throughout its focal range, sigma has the optical stabilizer for low-light. Both lenses need to be stepped down a bit to obtain its sharpest image (for sigma's case its @ f5.6 for both 17mm and 70mm). Also sigma has a better AF motor (HSM is silent and fast) than tamron. Both have good bokeh but I prefer sigma on this one. For contrast, some say that tamron has a tendency to over-contrast(maybe it depends on their copy).
For me it really depends on your preference. If you want a faster lens and think that the 17-50mm range is enough for you, go with the tamron. But if you want an optical stabilized lens with a longer range and macro capability, then go with the sigma.
IMHO, you can't go wrong with either one as long as you get a good copy.

i second this sir andrew

[adventure.sales]

sa ako pud sigma

[nowayL]

some group shots

[michaelocana]

[wildfuzz]

wow grabe nice kau ni bro..bro mike g add tka sa fb dugay ra wla mn ko nmu g accept oi.hehehe

[kael7©]

@nowayl: bro question, unsa usually ang aperture for taking group shots. above 5.6? tia...

[kael7©]

share diay sa akong sikma

[nowayL]

@nowayl: bro question, unsa usually ang aperture for taking group shots. above 5.6? tia...

At least f5.6 BroKAel para hait bisan asa. Bisan gani sa portrait Bro basta dili bokeh2x para asta whiteheads kuha .... hehe