Yes
No
I sooo totally agree with this statement... You can choose to be responsible even before the act.. But getting rid of the result after the act is another story...
and Nerry Soon Ruiz as a mother and a doctor should look at this at all angles. I can't believe that she went this far...
I'd say for Nerry, its all about the MOney.
Abortion kills both the soul..
I smell bigotry here . . .
yes to contraceptive . . .
anti RH bill people s@cks . . . they cant imagine how to be poor
some very poor youth / children blame their parents for bringing them to this world
that they cant even support their basic needs . . .
It is true that when rthe sperm dpesn't reach the egg (when there is no fertilization) there is nothing to abort.
But the SCIENTIFIC FACT is that contraceptives DO allow the sperm to reach the egg because contraceptives are not 100% effective. In fact, with most pills, ovulation is NOT prevented as much as 60% of the time. So it is very possible for the sperm to reach the egg and fertilize the egg even when contraceptives are used correctly and consistently.
When this happens, all hormonal contraceptives and IUDS have a BACKUP MECHANISM -- THEY PREVENT THE FERTILIZED EGG FROM IMPLANTING IN THE URERUS. With nowhere to implant, the fertilizefd egg 9which is already a human being) is eventually destroyed. This is an early-term CHEMICAL ABORTION.
All contraceptive pills, IUDs, implantables, injectab;les and "emergency" contraceptives can prevent the implkantation of the fertilized egg. It is estimated that oral contraceptives (pills) do this at least once in 77 cycles, So for every 77 women using the pill, at least one abortion occurs each month.
ABORTIFACIENTS
I think we all have to learn how abortifacient contraceptives really work. Many people still are not aware of the scientific fact that many contraceptives can cause abortions.
I have posted the evidence proving the existence of abportifacient contraceptives this many times. A link to the compiled evidence is at:
https://www.istorya.net/forums/politi...ml#post7108702
The SCIENTIFIC evidence is clear. Such contraceptives are abortifacient. And since the RH/Abortion Bill (HB 5043) explicitly funds and forces the distributiion of these abortifacient contraceptives, then the bill should be seen as an ABORTION BILL.
This is a scientific fact, not a religious one.
Yes. That's another reason why people should NOT vote for Neri Soon-Ruiz and the other authors of the RH/Abortion Bill. Vote for pro-life candidates instead when possible!Originally Posted by high_heels
DEFEND YOUR RIGHTS AND THE LIVES OF THE UNBORN!
NO TO THE COERCIVE, TOTALITARIAN RH/ABORTION BILL (HB 5043)!
YES TO LIFE!
Please sign the petition AGAINST the RH/Abortion Bill (HB5043)
http://www.petitiononline.com/xxhb5043/
Last edited by mannyamador; 05-01-2010 at 06:48 PM.
ayaw intawon ug i legalize ang abortion instead i penalize ang mag pa abort
this topic is sickening...
like unsa man choice daw sa uban beh?
mao gani gi abort gay di kaya buhion?...
maao ra kaau mo mohisogot evil this, evil that.. but let me ask you this..
kinsa man mosupport sa unwanted child? immediate family? government?.. hell yeah.. di baya saun magbuhi bata.. kamo? ganahan ba mo mu buhi sa di ninu anak? mosugot mo nga inyu taxes gamiton ra para sa sayup sa uban tao?
abortion is murder,evil,bad, etc.. but there are instances it is a NECESSITY.. there is also overpopulation we have to contend with.. (i hope you dont mistake overcrowding with overpopulation, i expect you people are smarter than that)
Similar Threads |
|