US forces 'ready to strike Syria'

[pak88]

---

Daghan man jud dili uyon nga duna interventions dha sa Syria then let the Syrians deal it themselves let the Civil war continues.......

As Sarah Pallin said "Let Allah sort it out"

But then, was it wrong for the U.S. to have allowed up to 100,000 civilians die in Bosnia before intervening? Or for humanity to allow up to a million killed in the Rwandan civil war?

[Gharid]

ot: haha nganong nag.personalay naman nuon ning duha diri. hehe

ont: war is not always a good option. hoping for a peaceful resolution

unfortunately some idiot just can't help sniffing undies and calling people pimp.. well that happens when you can't post anything that has substance..

going back to the topic.. unfortunately the way i see it war is inevitable.. they have planned these decades ago.. come 9/11 and the elites will do another sacrifice.. what remains a question is what will Iran and Russia do what roles are they playing?..

[MaInEvEnT]

War is never a good thing... Too bad they're in the brink of it... samot ka lisud tanan ani

[JcBoY]

War is never a good thing... Too bad they're in the brink of it... samot ka lisud tanan ani

It is a Good Thing for thE US of A to extort money from some despotic Arab states...

PressTV - Kerry: Arab countries offered to pay for US war on Syria

Btw, what would this mean for the US of A...joke only?

China Sends Warships To Syria, Joining Russian Warships In Mediterranean Sea | Global Unrest

[H.Wolowitz]

U.S. Senate approves resolution giving Obama authority to use military force against Syria

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/05/wo...anted=all&_r=0

good thing it is a limited authority only. sana di lalagpas nang 30 days yung military strike

[Renz8]

As Sarah Pallin said "Let Allah sort it out"

But then, was it wrong for the U.S. to have allowed up to 100,000 civilians die in Bosnia before intervening? Or for humanity to allow up to a million killed in the Rwandan civil war?

Well it's not wrong matod pa sa mga suheto dri dili man daw na problema sa Kalibutan ang internal nga problema sa 1 ka nasod aw na hala let the killing continue............

[M.A.D.]

From all over the web:



Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., tweeted, “Calls and emails from my constituents is 100 to 1 AGAINST getting involved in Syria. The American people are speaking.”

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said 99 percent of the calls his office oppose an attack.

Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., said, “Constituents who have contacted my office by phone or mail oppose action in Syria 523-4 so far.”

Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., tweeted, “My phones are blowing up, and an overwhelming amount of constituents oppose U.S. military intervention in Syria.”

Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz., tweeted, “Syria constituent calls 489-2 against.”

Rep. Shelley Capito, R-W.V., said of “about 1,000 calls to my office, maybe 5 are for.”

Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., said calls and emails to his offices are 600 to 9 against striking Syria.

Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark., tweeted, “I received 225 emails via Welcome to Congressman Tim Griffin | Congressman Tim Griffin website over the weekend regarding Syria, and out of the 225 only 3 support U.S. military action against Syria.”

Rep. Steve Chabot, R-Ohio, said he is getting swamped with phone calls and on-the-street comments from constituents telling him to oppose a strike on Syria.

Rep. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said, “I’m told the phone calls are 9 out of 10 against a strike in Syria, from my constituents in Kentucky.”

Rep. Ralph Hall, R-Texas: “I have received hundreds of calls and letters from constituents expressing strong opposition.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., tweeted, “My office has been inundated with constituent phone calls and emails about Syria. Virtually unanimous opposition to military intervention.”

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, tweeted, “So far about 500 emails regarding Syria. 499 say NO and 1 say YES go to war” and “Hundreds of calls to our Provo and Washington, D.C., office. So far not a single call in favor of bombing Syria.”

Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., tweeted, “The phones in my office are ringing off the hook and mail is flowing in. Almost all of the people are opposed to intervention in Syria.”

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, tells WND his office is hearing the same overwhelming opposition to intervention.

Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., said, “I don’t know a member of Congress whose e-mails and phone calls are in favor of [bombing Syria.]”

Rep. Steve Southerland, R-Fla., said 96 percent of his emails and phone calls are from constituents who want to express their opposition to military action. He said, “Overwhelmingly, we are hearing pushback from our citizens against military intervention in Syria.”

Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., said he’s heard no support from his constituents for striking Syria: “I have not had a single person, not a single person, in over 92 Facebook posts just a little while ago in a question we posed, having a single constituent or a South Carolinian saying let’s go to war in Syria.”

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, said “a very high percentage” of the constituents contacting his office have been against U.S. involvement in Syria. He estimated that 90 percent of more than 1,000 calls and emails from Americans have been urging him not to support intervention.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said, “I can tell you that in my office, the phones are bopping off the hook there. And almost unanimously people are opposed to what the president is talking about.”

Rep. Ted Yoho, R-Fla., told the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing he and his constituents say “not just no, but heck no!” to Syria intervention.

Rep. Alan Lowenthal, D-Calif., has received more than 653 e-mails, phone calls and social-media. Only 11 of the comments favored strikes.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., admitted her constituents’ calls were “overwhelmingly negative” over a possible Syria intervention, but she added, “They don’t know what I know.”

Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., tweeted, “I’ve been hearing a lot from members of our armed forces. The message I consistently hear: Please vote no on military action against Syria.”

[cobraKing]

gubat na!!!!

[hulagway]

ayaw lang.daghang ofw ug pamilya ang ma apektohan.

[M.A.D.]

Proposed Iranian Pipeline. Map shows how Iran may bypass the sanctions being put on it by the west should it complete its gas/oil pipeline.



Proposed Nabucco pipeline. This could be the plan of the west(Saudi, Qatar, and US) since it passes over their ally, Turkey. Note that the map still does not indicate passing over Syria specifically Damascus, Homs, and Allepo. Qatar has to make this happen since they could not make a pipeline over Saudi Arabia.



Map of region with all pipelines(both west and russian)



If there is any clarification or additional info, please don't hesitate to add them.