doesnt mean kobe scored 81 that hes the better scorer...... hmmmm debatable pa na.. remember when jordan socred 69 points he hit 48 fields goals, and when kobe socred 81 he hit 49 field goals........ gamay ra deperensya, ciguro sa 3 pointers ra ang deperensya........
3 point shooting cguro advantage si kobe. pero scoring Jordan got my vote..... averaging a carreer best 30.01 tied with Willt.. kobe is norming 25 or 26 points per game in his entire Carreer..
Iverson is a better scorer than kobe.... check the stats
www.nba.com......
heck even David Robinson socred 71 points in a game is he a better scorer than jordan nope....
Correction lang, Kobe
hit 49 FGs in his 81 point performance and Jordan
hit 48 FGs in his 69 point performance? Assuming all of those were 2 point-FGs, Kobe would've scored 98 points and Jordan scored 96 points in FGs alone!! Maybe Kobe and Jordan attempting 49 and 48 attempts.
Actually, the stats really don't speak a lot. Kobe didn't start the way Jordan and Iverson started their careers, Kobe was a shadow to Shaq and it took him years before he became a relentless scorer unlike MJ and Iverson who were immediately the go to guys since their rookie seasons. Since Shaq left, look at Kobe, he's been scoring at will. He can easily have those 40 or 50 point nights and do it in a night to night basis. It was not because of Kobe's 81 point performance that made him the better scorer but it's his consistency to score big every night. He's got the reputation of being a ballhog or being selfish yet he's effective. Got any player who singlehandedly outsocre the other team after three quarters? Not even Wilt Chamberlain's 100 point performance was able to outscore the New York Knicks after three quarters. Kobe did against Dallas (Kobe 62, Dallas 61).