(("However, it was recently announced that rival sanctioning body, the WBO, would get the honor of sanctioning the bout (and charging their sanctioning fee). Since Pacquiao lost his WBO welterweight belt to Timothy Bradley last June and Marquez just vacated his WBO junior welterweight title to fight Pacquiao, the organization decided to invent a trinket for this big money bout-- The WBO "Champion of the Decade" belt.
Of course, along with the "honor" of such a title, there's the customary 3% sanctioning fee-- a substantial amount of money when considering the combined purse of the fighters involved. It could come to a seven-figure payday for the Puerto Rico-based sanctioning body, just for issuing some belt and allowing the promotion to use their organization's name.
And it was certainly enough money to set off the WBC's Sulaiman and kill all semblance of diplomacy from the 81-year-old. But rather than burn bridges with boxing cash cow, Pacquiao, the Mexico City native went after countryman and former WBC belt holder, Marquez.
Talking to Arturo Sacramento of Yahoo! Deportes, Sulaiman railed on Marquez, describing the 39-year-old future hall of famer as a fighter who became an idol because of his losses to Pacquiao and one who was not popular at all before those fights.
Characterizing Marquez as someone who chronically complains about his losses being robberies, the head of the WBC would even shoot down Marquez's claims of foul play following his most recent bout with Pacquiao-- saying that Marquez's complaints were without merit and only spurred on by a nationalistic Mexican broadcast crew. In the rest of the world, according to Sulaiman, Pacquiao clearly won.
But that's not what Sulaiman had to say back in November of last year, when Pacquiao was awarded a narrow majority decision victory over Marquez."))
katawa man ko aning JOSE SULAIMAN karon mao na ni iyang comment......Maybe because he was jealous that WBC was being snubbed by MARQUEZ?