All About Current Admin of Duterte

[godwhacker]

---

Rodrigo Duterte is The 21st Century’s Prime Example of Successful Non-Alignment in Pursuit of The Win-Win Model

[firestarter]

Kanusa pa kha ma abot ang panahon kanang united na tanan pinoy dli na madala brainwash, kamo na huna2x kana dli na madala fake news. Kanusa pa kha ta mka tupong sa Singapore Japan korea O bsan sa Thailand nlang. G ahak layua pa nto oyy. Cge pmn ta problema aning poverty, traffic corruption, baha, basura hahaha g ahak nlang intawn. hayyyy g ahak pakauwaw rman intawn ta. Nya isog pa kau ni uban makig gubat China pamahuway mo oi labayan rman gani ta basura uban nasud. labayan rman gani ta ukay2x hahaha gubat2x pamu dha..

Mao ni akong nakita sa sobraan ang pamulitika, overpopulated, daghan uneducated.

One Child Policy ta.

Madaghan ang pobre kay dili naman ka support ang government mismo tungod sa kadaghan tawo.

Mosamot pa gyud ka daghan kay ang mga uneducated, wa may lain kalingawan, instead mag study para sa exams or sa mga subjects, mag study man ug palami ug unsaon pag himo ug bata...

Ang resulta daghan na kaayo bata, dili na pud maka pa iskwela kay ang kita, good for 1 baby raman.
Daghan na bata, managko, igo ra kamao mo basa kay elementary ra kutob.

Karon kani pud mga kandidato labi na corrupt, asa man diay na mangampanya?

Aw didto gyud na sa daghan tawo, which by the way is kasagaran pulos pud under-educated didto nas mga pobre. Kabalo mana sila nga dili na sila maka ilad sa mga tawo nga nanagtrabaho.

Aw democracy man, ruled by plurality ang resulta mo daug tong mga corrupt nga daghan kwarta.

And the cycle goes around and around and around , dili ta ka alinggawas ani kung overpopulated, under educated, unya corrupt pa gyud ang atong mga leaders.

[Kristiano]

Kung kinsa pay pobre, mao pay daghan ug anak... one of the reason, para makatabang sa ginikanan... mao na ni, gihimong investment ang anak...
mag Child limit policy ta? andar pud ning CBCP... XD

[obelisk]

Kung kinsa pay pobre, mao pay daghan ug anak... one of the reason, para makatabang sa ginikanan... mao na ni, gihimong investment ang anak...
mag Child limit policy ta? andar pud ning CBCP... XD

Ayaw boss. Kay RIP Freedom ta ana. Ug anti-life daw ta ana. Kay nag limit ta.

[digitalsuperman]

Kung kinsa pay pobre, mao pay daghan ug anak... one of the reason, para makatabang sa ginikanan... mao na ni, gihimong investment ang anak...
mag Child limit policy ta? andar pud ning CBCP... XD

para nako daghan gyud kaayo tapulan sa pilipinas. ug syempre tapulan ka pobre gyud ka. kay ang pobre nga kugihan mo-arangarang man kahimtang. sa kanang mga skwater oh daghana istambay. lagsik pa gyud panglawas. naa man daghan trabaho ba.atay mao pa gyud mga pilian ug trabaho. kung buot hunahunaon pwede sila sulod army para naa income or lain trabaho. daghan kaayo ko kaila nga pobre naningkamot karon maayo na pagkabutang. ako di gyud ko maluoy anang mga tapulan.bahalag ingnon ko batig batasan.hehe.

[firestarter]

Nindot ni... Sa panahon ni noynoy ambot ug ma approve ni.. Daghan kaayo checheburetche ug kadto pa.

National ID ta mga sirs.

Daghan kaayo affected ani.. my goodness..

Ang mga NPA nga mga Rebelde intawon luoy na kaayo, ang mga ISIS ug Maute, agoy kaluoy.

Ang mga corrupt nga naay mga ghost employee.. nahala bira..

Lacson downplays security, privacy ‘threats’ of national ID system 0
BY THE MANILA TIMES ON MAY 27, 2018 LATEST STORIES, TODAY'S BREAKING NEWS
Twitter
SENATOR Panfilo Lacson downplayed on Sunday the warning raised by some groups that the passage of the national identification system bill would pose a threat to security and people’s privacy, saying that only enemies of the government and those who uses “aliases” will be affected by the measure.

Lacson said the bill, which seeks to establish the Philippine Identification System (PhilSys), would be beneficial to billions of Filipinos because they could use the national ID in all transactions.

He said people would not need to carry all their government issued IDs when opening a bank account, applying for a loan, renewing their passport or driver’s license and other processes that would need proof of identification because their PhilSys would be enough.

Lacson said he found the claim of those saying that a national ID would infringe on people’s right to privacy inconsistent, noting that personal information are contained in passports, drivers’ licenses and other government issued IDs.


“To those criticizing the measure, don’t they have driver’s license, or voter’s ID because the information stated on those IDs, including biometrics, are the same information that will be included in the national ID so why are they complaining when they already underwent the process,” Lacson said.

The senator said that those who would be negatively affected by the implementation of the PhilSys would be those using aliases and enemies of the government intentionally hiding their real identities to carry out their activities.

“So this concern of the leftists, members [of the]Abu Sayyaf group and other enemies of government . . . because with the ID system it would be easy to identify who is who,” added Lacson, the sponsor and one of the authors of the bill.

The bicameral conference committee last week approved the reconciled version of the bill and both the Senate and the House of Representatives were expected to ratify this on Monday so President Rodrigo Duterte could sign it into law.

“This [national ID]will a be a landmark legislation because it is only under the Duterte administration that it would be enacted,” the Senator said, adding that the proposal has gone through four different administrations. JEFFERSON

[firestarter]

Kung kinsa pay pobre, mao pay daghan ug anak... one of the reason, para makatabang sa ginikanan... mao na ni, gihimong investment ang anak...
mag Child limit policy ta? andar pud ning CBCP... XD

Sa ako lang ok ra gyud kaayo ang Child Limit..

Whether we like it or not naa gyud gihapoy influence ang simbahan pero as of this administration pwerte na gyud gamaya nalang sa ilang influence.

Mo andar na sila basta walay madawat.

[Don Delmar]

Mag wild ang simbahan ana one child policy mu gamay ila kolekta ana.. D na mahitabo sa Pinas. Controlado kau ta simbahan bsan ato pamolitika bsan ato military. Ang Catholicism bya mga military rba knug buhat ana believe it or not mao na ingun amu prof nga New Zealander pero lahi sad na nga topic. Bahin sa mga pinoy na bugo nya tapulan. murag wla nta mabuhat ana huwat nlang ta kanusa na cla mahurot. Ang ato nlang na ila anak unta dli parehas nila ka bugo.

Ahak ana uban tao oi ang national id system threat to peoples privacy daw.. Kalami nlang jud pang duslakon. Kana balauda dugay nana gpang gamit uban lugar oi ato rna copyahon gani. kana mga debate ana dugay nana nila na debatehan. Script mana mga bugo oi kna negative kau pessimistic kau tanan. Contento nmu status quo mga animala mo? ayaw mi amunga ana kai d mi bugo..

[yacky2006]

gi buhian lagi ni sila. tsk tsk

Zamboanga City security tightened for arrival of 96 MNLF members | Inquirer News

[yacky2006]

dili child limit.

2 child policy noon agree ko.

Pasabot 2 child ra puwede ma gastohan sa governo.

example: 2 child ra puwede ma enrol sa public school. Ang ika 3rd naanay bayad.