Comments on Qualfon

[lstorya]

---

see,crap au.hahahahaha,tell your friend he/she might be famous,they keep using man gud a certain person as an example inside,naa daw agent nga ming uli in the middle of a break kay la kakaya sa calls!calls my f***ing ass,kasayon ra sa calls,scripted all the way,gilisod lisod lang dyud nila,puro pampahadlok gibuhat,imagine idiretso ka call inag ka 6th day juz after discussing theoritical lessons,no call listening,no barge-ins,not even complete software analysis and studies,no nothing,mosulong ka sa gubat way pusil walay bala daun buta.pero basin lain sad ni nga person mc,kay they say "nanalaw sa calls",not coz of how they handle the people.

[mckoy_slipstream]

Wala pa to cya kaabot sa floor. Di jud to mahadlok sa call, experienced agent naman to cya. He's now with emax, regular na cya did2.

[handsoff241]

humana ko training pag feb 5 maka kuha kog sweldo dis 25 ? ?

please allow me to answer

makakuha ka sa imung prize este sweldo after nimo makumpleto imung requirements

[lstorya]

please allow me to answer

makakuha ka sa imung prize este sweldo after nimo makumpleto imung requirements

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH,nice one!

[killswitch]

up lng ko ani,nindot ni inyo discuss dah...

[darkdruid]

unsai ayo dinha ninyo run? Qualfon, so far... sa akong panan-aw... nindot cya.. my gf dont have regrets.

[yanzxcore]

up lng ko ani,nindot ni inyo discuss dah...

saba diha ya.. unsai naka nindot sa Q?.. hahaha..

[trisk68]

8 hours na ang work.... hahahaha

[istoryaaah]

"Almost all growing companies have HRD's, its there for a reason and not just recruitment."

what if the HRD itself is defunct?usually,the reason why some companies which have messed up sups is coz the HRD themselves are the ones that has the problem,either thier biased,or theyre juz really thier for recruitment and most of the times they dont give a s**t.and quitting coz of the sup doesnt mean the agent is quitting coz he doesnt wanna be supervised,most of the times,the agents fight back if theyre being stepped on,not quit.the reason they quit is when they did everything they could to fight back (including going to HR) and still nothing happens.i have been to many call centers and seen so many cases and instances to say that agents quit coz of the supervisor and the problem is within the agents themselves.but hey,i respect your opinion and you do have a point,and you also pointed out that "I personally don't think its applicable at all times",so,fair enough,hehehehe.

"Pero so far based on the working environment hehehe... two thumbs up! hehehe..."

yah,i think thats the only reason im gonna stay for a bit longer.thanks for bringing that up,at least thats a positive comment from all the negative crap i hear.and no,we cant negotiate.

I respect your opinion but don't you think its a little self-opinionated remark? Are you from the HRD department? Do you have a management role that can provide a greater birds eye view of what is really going on in that department or the company as a whole? We actually talk more on how the company handled us and how it did not favored us. But if you look at it on a different angle, you're not the only one being served by the company, and worst comes to worst, you (individualy) do not favor at least 1% of it. Consider yourself a pawn ready to be pushed upfront and be eaten by the enemy. The company's main objective is not the welfare of its employees, I'd say its secondary... after the profit of course.

I can prove you wrong on the part that most employees quit because of their supervisors. NO they don't quit because of their supervisors, they quit because of their ego and the self-satisfying fact that no one can tell them what to do nor work insanely for the company. Do you think the term "kapoy man graveyard" og "gamay ra sweldo" has anything to do with your supervisor? Think again...

just my two cents... and i'm worth less than that...

[lstorya]

I respect your opinion but don't you think its a little self-opinionated remark? Are you from the HRD department? Do you have a management role that can provide a greater birds eye view of what is really going on in that department or the company as a whole? We actually talk more on how the company handled us and how it did not favored us. But if you look at it on a different angle, you're not the only one being served by the company, and worst comes to worst, you (individualy) do not favor at least 1% of it. Consider yourself a pawn ready to be pushed upfront and be eaten by the enemy. The company's main objective is not the welfare of its employees, I'd say its secondary... after the profit of course.

I can prove you wrong on the part that most employees quit because of their supervisors. NO they don't quit because of their supervisors, they quit because of their ego and the self-satisfying fact that no one can tell them what to do nor work insanely for the company. Do you think the term "kapoy man graveyard" og "gamay ra sweldo" has anything to do with your supervisor? Think again...

just my two cents... and i'm worth less than that...

ummmm,i dont think i have mentioned anything about agents quitting coz of their supervisor.what i understood from what i had posted,it means,THE REASON why agents quit IF its about the supervisor,not agrents quit BECAUSE of the supervisor.there would be many reasons why an agent would quit,and coz of the supervisor is one of them,and so is coz of the HRD,also one of the reasons.it would be unethical of me to say it WOULD be coz of those two that agents would quit from a center.only an idiot would say "gamay ra sweldo" is coz of the supervisor,whered you get that??and my complain about qualfon has never been about the supervisor,its about the company itself and how they handle the people."The company's main objective is not the welfare of its employees, I'd say its secondary... after the profit of course.",thats the point,all companies do that,but not all companies do that in an "in your face" manner.and yes,i was an HR staff for 6 months in a certain company,though i handled the job pretty well thinking bout the fact on how agents feel bout f**ked up HR people,so why would i act like one.though on that time,my position didnt require me to talk with any agents,all i did was paperwork.of course we would talk about how the company handled us,what else is there to talk about?ill take convergys for example,i was with sprint,adn everyone knows that sprint is the most messed up account an agent can ever handle,but did i leave any bad comments about CVG?no!i even regret i stopped working there.why??coz the company handled me pretty well,they paid whats due,and gave even more.so why would i complain?noted,they have TL's that are sh**y,my own tl was a pain in the ass.but no,i didnt complain.thats coz "the company handled me very well".now,lets talk about why would i leave negative comments about a certain company...hmmmm,i wonder why?oh yeah,COZ THEY SUCK!!!and the reasons have been stated in detail,my past posts couldnt have been any more detailed than it is.and oh,thanks for the reply,it was educational.

(and let me tell you something about the term "self-opinionated",a certain phrase would only be like that if it was from you alone.im pretty much sure it really wouldnt be "self-opinionated" if everyone else has the same opinion and can also be assessed by everyone else,dont you think?as of today,i have invented a new term,"everyone-opinionated",exclusively patented by me.to be used if everyone has the same opinionated remark.)