Abtik ang mga trolls ron kay naa silay happening ugma.
May unta ug daghan ni sila oe, maluoy man pud ta..
Gitagaan na ganig pabor nga gi himo pang holiday ang ilang planong protest date..
They could not ask for more.. hahahaha
Abtik ang mga trolls ron kay naa silay happening ugma.
May unta ug daghan ni sila oe, maluoy man pud ta..
Gitagaan na ganig pabor nga gi himo pang holiday ang ilang planong protest date..
They could not ask for more.. hahahaha
OT: Naa na pud ni balik ang troll..
hahahaha.. hasola
Double time bradier may nalang makatabang ugma....
naay makakuha ug drone shots ugma? ky tanawn nato unsa kadak on ang m.occupy nga area sa 5%.
murag dili man tingali to desperate move ang gi buhat ni Trillianes sa pag adto sa DBS ug HSBC bank branches aron i confirm ang mga account number.
ang singapore government stricto sila sa banking laws. murag kahibaw c Trillianes nga kadto nga bank account number non existent or dili under sa iyahang name mao nang confident kaayo siya nga ni adto sa bank aron ipa media nga dili sakto ang gi pasangil sa presidente
What kind of logic is that?
By not approving Gina Lopez, mawala ba ang functionality sa DENR? Naa bay effect? Wala. Kay dili ang DENR ang gi-attack, but si Gina.
Pero if hatagan nimo ug 1k budget ang DENR, mawala iya ability to function? Clearly yes.
Big difference.
Dili lagi na pwede. Democracy ta. Naay process sa pag.remove niya. In which rule book did you read na that is how you remove the CHR head? Naa ba sa jurisprudence na valid way of removing the CHR head ang pangbully?I'd like to make it a point nga naa nay condition ang lage.. "Resign and we will release the budget"..
Ana raman na ka simple.
If mu-post kog TP or Mocha Uson sir, mutuo na ka? Kay murag mas mutuo pa kag nila ug ni Rappler kaysa sa jurisprudence da. Di gani ka mutuo ug ROC. But that's fine
Inyoha bitaw nang Rappler maong akong gi quote kay basin pa diay mo to-o.
That was quoted from what Alvarez said..
Sa imong gi cite nga Jurisprudence sir, murag ang palabot2x raman sa usa ka branch sa government to an independent or a Constitutional body created by the Constitution itself.
Wala man nag mention diha regarding Fiscal Autonomy sa CHR.
The real question here is whether or not Congress who has the power of the purse has the power to reduce or adjust CHR's budget. Which by the way was not stated in the Constitution to have fiscal autonomy.
By the way, I was referring to your mention of EO 163 when I cited the jurisprudence. Seems like dili updated si TP or si Mocha Pero advise lang sir, basaha ang main issue. Murag imung nabasa kay dili ang main issue, assuming if nibasa ug nakasabot ka indeed.
FYI, you do not need to prove it in court before you can presume a Constitutional crisis. Again, I do not know asa na nimo gikuha imung mga basis. Ambut kung unsai law books sa first year sa time nimo, pero wala man koy nahinumduman na ing.ana na logic saona. Years ago paman sad tu gud, basin naa nay ni.change? Enlighten me please.Maybe ikaw ang wala ka realize nga as of now it is a political question, unless otherwise SC will decide it is a judicial question suitable for Judicial Review.
Mag sige kag pamugos nga need ni i Judicial Review nga wala paman gani diay ni gi file ang case ani, nor a budget resolution. Paabot2x lang sa ta.. Because as of now there is NO case or controversy brought about in the ambit of the courts.
Pamolitika to.. molansar tingale nig Presidente or executive position ning tawhana sunod election mo expire naman iyang term karon.
- - - Updated - - -
Sir, is their a case or controversy here?
Does the CHR have Fiscal Autonomy?
Is bullying if this was even considered one, unconstitutional?
Is the years in law school even worth a mention here? ... Likay sa tas ad hominem, kay wala ko kaila anang first year sir.
Kay basin mo sulti pud kog..
Who died and made you Supreme Court to decide this as a Constitutional crisis.
I very well know you are anti Duterte.. but we will get to that eventually.
Last edited by firestarter; 09-20-2017 at 04:22 PM.
There is a Constitutional Crisis. Why? A Constitutional body is in danger of being abolished.
Now, you enlighten me.In which rule book did you read na that is how you remove the CHR head? Naa ba sa jurisprudence na valid way of removing the CHR head ang pangbully?
- - - Updated - - -
Not attacking you as a person. Attacking your knowledge of the law. Because it seems to me ngara ra kutob, you dont even recognize the ROC. It's kinda hard to argue against someone who only relies on first year law and TP as basis for their arguments.
Similar Threads |
|