although i agree with some of your comments but i dont agree with your repeated and somewhat immature comments of "..in a weak era", balikbalikon jd para makuha imo point?
anyway, declaring that era as a weak era is somewhat irresponsible and wrong, also an insults to those great teams back in the 90s who missed the chance because of the Bulls domination.
if motan.aw ka sa 90s game, daghan team na maayu in terms of teamplay, defense, etc. masapawan lang jd sa spotlight.
so if any of you knows how to look at TEAMS, it does not mean na because daghan superstars,
even MIAMI heat this season cannot be Declared a complete TEAM yet, without LBJ basin naa ra guro na cla sa 4th place or at the bottom of the playoff seed,
a good team is like the 2004 Pistons, they won the championship by teamwork and unselfish play, How bout the Spurs? even their bench can execute the system properly (hapit mapildi ang heat sa bench sa SPURS
)
With teamwork, good defense, a perfect system for perfect players, it can be concluded that the 90s bulls is a good example of a complete team.
1. Defenders such as Pippen and Rodman, dont discount Jordan contribution to defense.
2. Rebounders like Longley, Rodman, Pippen, Jordan
3. Shooters like Kerr, Jordan, Pippen.
4. 6th man Kukuc can shoot and defend, a good backup for rodman and/or pippen.
5. Playmakers like Jordan, Pippen, Harper and of course Phil Jackson
6. If you know how triangle offense work, then you guys can conclude that the 90s bulls execute it perfectly.
ngano kana ra man na mga players ako gi mention? kay if you watch the 90s bulls game, Phil jackson only uses around 8 players per game,
that is the first 5 + 3 reserves, Jordan and Pippen plays Huge minutes per game.
and for you trollo, if you think that the 96 season is a weak season, and the 90s a weak era, then you dont know shit about the 90s or basketball in general.