![Quote](images/metro/blue/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
juknojukno
DAZZLING is subjective bro(meaning lalisonon pa na, opposite sa subjective is objective), so again dapat dili sila manakop. I'm happy to know that you had already posted on the other older thread that HID installation should have a LAW on specification.
About the height sa agent, sample ra to nako bro. Diba ang TFA Agent man ang mo dakop nya nagbarog? So sila ang maka judge if DAZZLING ang incoming car/motorcycle that's why I said it's subjective ang basis sa pagdakop sa HID bec. there's no standards defined in the LAW. Sample standards sa light bro ay sa US, Oregon
http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/816.html and go to section 816.050
Since subjective ang pagdakop sa TFA and there's no accurate law on regulation and specification of what is really accepted and legal aftermarket HID installation in our country then walay solid basis ang TFA nga modakop sa HID installed motorcycles.
Lastly, your point nga kung maglingkod ang 5'11 or 4'11 sa car seat same ra sila ug visual height? hhmmm I think medyo sayop ka ani, this is not to offend shorter people but a shorter height human has shorter torso(sa bisaya pa ang lawas), so inig lingkod ani nila ubos ila panglantaw. Have u noticed naa mga women driver halos dili makita ang nawong or agtang ra makita inig sugat nimo while you're also driving on the opposite lane. Ila nawong natabunan sa steering wheel nya ang agtang ra sa driver nakita. So does that make a difference or not on the visual height in reference to the driver?
P.S.
Kung madakpan mo kay tungod sa HID nya ipa tang2x gani ayaw mo ug tuo. Wala sila rights mokuha sa imo HID. That is your private property and you own it, you bought it and it's your right to keep it. Ug dili sad sila kapugos ug patang2x ana nimo. Nobody can force you what to do on your private property. Know your rights. Lastly, It's never stated in any of the LTO Laws or philippine constitution nga bargohon ang head lamp/HID kung madakpan. Ingna lang nga pa issue lang ka ug TOP. Kung magstorya na mo sa TFA, be humble and courteous don't be offensive or provoking sa TFA, they feel they are empowered so taas na sila ug garbo. Taronga lang ug explain nya pasabta sila nga wala ka nakabasa ana sa balaod nga bargohon or naa sa memorandum nga allowed ang HID basta naa lang hi/lo beam. Use their strength as their weakness.
pangitaa diri ug naka state bah diri nga bargohon ang HID/LAMP. Almost all penalties for traffic violation are fines and fees.
Wall Photos | Facebook
The Land Transportation Office of the Philippines
http://www.lto.gov.ph/Issuances/RA4136.pdf
http://www.lto.gov.ph/Issuances/Comp...evant_Laws.pdf
http://www.lto.gov.ph/fines_and_pena...ive_011510.pdf
http://www.lto.gov.ph/fines_and_pena...dum_011510.pdf
I think that's all. I rest my case.
peace! and world peace!
If dazzling is lalisonon pa, hala adto pakiglalis sa TFA agent..
daghana na nimo'g tabi oi, COMMON SENSE lang sad gud gamay. kung suwaw/sakit sa mata imong kasugat dilikado jud na. sa tinudanay wala pay law intended for HID users kay new pani sa ato nga technology. so ang ilang gibasihan is ang existing law about dazzling headlamp.
sa mga OEM nga sakyanan with HID's wala man lagi problema sa glare? kani raman jud mga nag retrofit ang naay problema.
naay koy gipangutana sauna nga Agent papili-on ra kuno nila unsay gusto sa nadagkpan, TOP or Imbargo? pili lang.
remeber sa wang2x operetion ni Pnoy? bargohon jud na galing lang PD96 lang nang wang2x..