Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[miyay]

---

none. it doesn't matter.

[kinsa ko]

bible ko bro kay i have faith...it's the substance of things hope for,the evidence of things not seen...

[doydi]

ang science naghatag na natog logical explanation sa mga nahitabo sa biblia... unya ang mga butang nga dili ma explain sa science, diha na ta mo kupot sa atong faith...

[INTENSITY XII]

Naa koy i-share mga bro... i'm a believer of God... but that doesn't mean that i believe in the bible directly bcoz we, as humans, born in this new world full of brilliant people and yet discovers only one thing, and that is "Questions". If aware mo sa bag-ong discovery karun nga gibuhatan gani nila ug tv series titled, Ancient Aliens.. This was conducted by various scientists and brilliant people from all over the world. Then there is one thing made me think that bible is concrete. They says that, Bible is a concrete history book that ever written in the history of mankind. Does this means, the scientists who were the maker of science or shall we say introduce science to the world, believes in the writings in the bible? You'll be the judge... =)

So, going back to the subject of this thread, my answer is that I believe in the writings in the Bible not the Bible itself but the writings on it.

[FAQ]

you don't expect the Bible to explain how did the dinosaurs become extinct... how the earth was hit by an asteroid whatsoever... those things aren't significant for them to be included in the Holy Book...

ahhh.... ang the great flood hinuon naa nya pero wa gimention asteroid? nya gi mention ang plagues pud sa exodus.. faetz, di diay significant ang mga mabiktima nga mga hayop nga natagakan sa mga asteroid, nga mga hayop pud binuhat sa "ginoo"..

[robert_papalid_ece]

significance when it comes to "salvation" and "faith" bru...

the Great Flood was mentioned since it narrates destruction of the earth due to man's wickedness and evil deeds... while the 10 Plagues of Egypt bru... was mentioned since it tells the story of the 10 calamities that happened in Egypt (who during that time are worshipping false gods) to convince the pharaoh to let the slaves go...

these events showed the power of God to impose punishments to correct/enlighten humanity of their evil doings...

thanks...

[kenites]

Naa koy i-share mga bro... i'm a believer of God... but that doesn't mean that i believe in the bible directly bcoz we, as humans, born in this new world full of brilliant people and yet discovers only one thing, and that is "Questions". If aware mo sa bag-ong discovery karun nga gibuhatan gani nila ug tv series titled, Ancient Aliens.. This was conducted by various scientists and brilliant people from all over the world. Then there is one thing made me think that bible is concrete. They says that, Bible is a concrete history book that ever written in the history of mankind. Does this means, the scientists who were the maker of science or shall we say introduce science to the world, believes in the writings in the bible? You'll be the judge... =)

So, going back to the subject of this thread, my answer is that I believe in the writings in the Bible not the Bible itself but the writings on it.

Wala ko kabalo ani bro..hatag daw ug link
kinsa nag commission ani nga project?

[FAQ]

significance when it comes to "salvation" and "faith" bru...

the Great Flood was mentioned since it narrates destruction of the earth due to man's wickedness and evil deeds... while the 10 Plagues of Egypt bru... was mentioned since it tells the story of the 10 calamities that happened in Egypt (who during that time are worshipping false gods) to convince the pharaoh to let the slaves go...

these events showed the power of God to impose punishments to correct/enlighten humanity of their evil doings...

thanks...

asa man ang salvation and truth ana wa may gani historical evidence ikahatag ang biblia.

[hitch22]

I don't think science has found the answer to the question on the origins of life and the universe. I don't think the scientific community will guarantee you that science will one day find out everything there is to know. Even with the advances in our knowledge and theories about the universe and life, scientists will be the first to tell you that they expect those theories to be upstaged or modified or added on by future theories. Just as Galileo demolished Aristotle's earth-centered universe, Newton came in and refined and unified Galileo's and Kepler's theories. Einstein did the same thing to Newton's gravity. In other words, there are no absolute truths in science. It is humble in this regard. Science accepts the fact that the theories that govern our thinking will keep expanding and changing, as new evidence and findings become available in the future. And that's the way it should be. That's the way human knowledge can ever advance.

The Bible is not supposed to be a source of scientific facts. The Vatican will be the first to tell you this. It is supposed to be a guide for morals and spirituality. The late biologist, Steven J. Gould, summed up the relationship between science and religion with the phrase "non-overlapping magisteria". In other words, they deal with different domains.

The problem is when religious fundamentalism holds sway and every word in the Bible is taken as the literal truth. That's how Galileo's heliocentric theory got himself into trouble during the 17th century. The Dominican friars were the first to condemn Galileo's view as heretical. They said something like "How dare this upstart propose such idiotic nonsense? The Bible specifically stated that Joshua ordered the sun to stand still!"

[WengIA]

di jud ni kayang tubagon sa science. magpabilin nga tinago jud ni aron ang tao motuo jud og Ginoo