Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[chad_tukes]

---

deers and bears... wake up from your hibernation. it's time to slap butts again.

[tripwire]

another discovery for science.

Discovering Ardi Videos : Evolution, Ardi : Discovery Channel

... as this is a continuing process...

[tripwire]

I dont get it... and immature you say? if you think maturity is licking others butt then - "girl, we are in different wavelengths"

oh... really, you just figured that out that you're that not matured? besides, I didn't say anything about "you're immature" - your interpretations precedes your downfall.

May God Bless You.

[tripwire]

Kebz, per your understanding... do you think science is all about lies? --- oops, the lie part is EVOLUTION. You don't see the point do you? hmmmm...

Kebz, who lied to you in the first place? Scientists? I would suggest you bark on their doorsteps or better yet create a “creationist experimentations” that prove them wrong and their lies. That would be interesting to see or read.

kebz, do you really know what is ICE CAPS, --- trip going technical? hmmm, good excuse, but the evidence does not support the claim... TRIP don't be silly... we are no scientist here who talk about technical things... relax What are the chemical components?

Me, technical? Of course! You started talking about ICE CAPS and refuting scientific explorations and you don’t see that as technical? Hahaha… naku dodong… let me ask you, do you have any “creationist explorations” that provides evidences that there is/are no ICE CAPS in mars? I would like to see that observation because this will provide different perspective and different views with regards of data analysis. Yours [creationists] and theirs [scientists]. Give at least something that your creationists group a proof of that data. Then we will discuss what technicality means.

--- are we gonna stick to your evolution topic or we talk about chemistry... stay focus...

C’mon dodong! You started this rambunctious ideas about ice caps that has no evidence and you refute their findings as outrageous and not to mention that there is/are no ice caps in mars… of course we are talking about chemistry because that’s part of evolutionary process. Or do I have to draw a picture for you so you can see the whole process of evolution. I’m focused… are you?

DNA is some kind of complex program? Are you sure? --- omg, trip i tot you are one of a kind.. hahaha! yea one of a kind pretender.. tsk tsk tsk... Crick later developed this idea in his famous "sequence hypothesis," according to which the chemical parts of DNA (the nucleotide bases) function like letters in a written language or symbols in a computer code. Just as letters in an English sentence or digital characters in a computer program may convey information depending on their arrangement, so too do certain sequences of chemical bases along the spine of the DNA molecule convey precise instructions for building proteins. Like the precisely arranged zeros and ones in a computer program, the chemical bases in DNA convey information in virtue of their "specificity." As Richard Dawkins notes, "The machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like." Software developer Bill Gates goes further: "DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created."

Kebz… read your sentence properly. Basaha ha… “DNA is some kind of complex program….” Some kind? You’re not even sure what you are talking about. The reason why I asked you is because “TECHNICALLY” you are unsure of what you are writing. Of course I know what DNA is… I’m in that field… you don’t graduate in College if you don’t know DNA. Also, you don’t need to tell me what Deoxyribonucleic acid is. I know what that is because science use that all the time not creationism.

basa ms. trip para ka maka sabot unsa dna... pa spoonfeed paman oi. Am I wrong to tell you that... so if i am then reklamo ad2 nila ayaw nako...

Very typical. Hahaha… me, read unsa ang DNA? Or maybe you need to learn about evolution kebz because you’re still young about the process… that's what I call “unevolved”.

[bluedes]

ang init nang laban..

@trip

you're wasting your time on creationists like those.. its stupid to argue with a fool.. people will not know who's who.. it's a waste of energy.. let the guy believe in creationism if he wants too.. other fools will believe him too, but who cares, they will all perish in due time anyway.. (cruel, but true.. a society filled with bastards like that will sink in its own anarchy anyway)

[tripwire]

@ Blue,

I get the idea clearly sir. I just wanted to let him see what we see because in my guess, I don't think he is looking. I want to challenge kebot if he can come up a better solution to prove us [evolutionists] wrong without any use of scientific methods then we can compare. I am also sure that he can't give any data that is not being referred by science. If his "observation" is clear and concise then I will try my best to understand creationist views. But, if he can't give me a sufficient and lopsided solutions, then I can indicate that kebot is just poorly supervised soul and are still need to be schooled.

@ kebot

let's compare... Creation vs. Evolution. Creation observation vs. Evolution observation. Provided that you use your own means without using science and me using science as my source. Why? Because you are certain that Evolution and it's scientific observations are lies. Do you agree with these terms?

[bluedes]

@ Blue,

I get the idea clearly sir. I just wanted to let him see what we see because in my guess, I don't think he is looking. I want to challenge kebot if he can come up a better solution to prove us [evolutionists] wrong without any use of scientific methods then we can compare. I am also sure that he can't give any data that is not being referred by science. If his "observation" is clear and concise then I will try my best to understand creationist views. But, if he can't give me a sufficient and lopsided solutions, then I can indicate that kebot is just poorly supervised soul and are still need to be schooled.

i can understand what you're doing.. but creationists who respond like that make a bad name for creationists in general. i like to share what i learned too but people like that are incorrigible.. there's no sharing of ideas to better each other's point of view, but not necessarily crushing the other's point of view.. you keep on exchanging *tones* with those types, you end up getting sucked into their blackhole inside their *so-called-faith*..

he's not looking to understand.. he's looking to destroy.. its as simple as it goes.. its nihilistic..

[donna_belle]

way to go sis trip

this is one of the most difficult problems sa mga creationists sister kay they are not matured enough to accept evolution or they get hurt when it is contrary to what they believe. i used to be a creationist until i had the chance to work with my father who is a biologist-doctor. it amazes me how wonderful evolution is when we study and observe them from the genes.

[kebotDiNaMute]

@ Blue,

I get the idea clearly sir. I just wanted to let him see what we see because in my guess, I don't think he is looking. I want to challenge kebot if he can come up a better solution to prove us [evolutionists] wrong without any use of scientific methods then we can compare. I am also sure that he can't give any data that is not being referred by science. If his "observation" is clear and concise then I will try my best to understand creationist views. But, if he can't give me a sufficient and lopsided solutions, then I can indicate that kebot is just poorly supervised soul and are still need to be schooled.

@ kebot

let's compare... Creation vs. Evolution. Creation observation vs. Evolution observation. Provided that you use your own means without using science and me using science as my source. Why? Because you are certain that Evolution and it's scientific observations are lies. Do you agree with these terms?

--- No! is it a handicap match? hmmm... trip you still trying your best but your are fighting in shadows... what i am fighting is not to prove my creation theory... but to prove your evolution theory is very wrong... I wont contest on my creation theory... again its useless for a clueless... get? but if you want to contest your EVOLUTION... PST me... i will ask you answer... simple... agree on these terms?

You want me to start asking? So what your great evolutionist have to say to a simple question.

CAN YOU GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF GENETIC MUTATION OR AN EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS WHICH CAN BE SEEN TO INCREASE THE INFORMATION IN THE GENOME?

Dawkins: Stop blah! blah blah!

take2: there's a POPULAR MISUNDERSTANDING OF EVOLUTION WHICH SAYS FISH TURNED INTO REPTILES AND REPTILES TURNED INTO MAMMALS... (so whos right? i guess all wrong.. hahaha)
they are descended from ancient animals... which we do not see today...

kebot: hahaha, fail. Simple question... error becomes misunderstanding... too bad... lies become excuse... epic fail. So trip do you have answer to the BOLD QUESTION? I hope you are way better than dawkins this time...

YouTube - Richard Dawkins Is Stumped For 19 Seconds on Question- And Still Failed To Answer The Question!

[schmuck]

--- No! is it a handicap match? hmmm... trip you still trying your best but your are fighting in shadows... what i am fighting is not to prove my creation theory... but to prove your evolution theory is very wrong... I wont contest on my creation theory... again its useless for a clueless... get? but if you want to contest your EVOLUTION... PST me... i will ask you answer... simple... agree on these terms?

You want me to start asking? So what your great evolutionist have to say to a simple question.

CAN YOU GIVE AN EXAMPLE OF GENETIC MUTATION OR AN EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS WHICH CAN BE SEEN TO INCREASE THE INFORMATION IN THE GENOME?

Dawkins: Stop blah! blah blah!

take2: there's a POPULAR MISUNDERSTANDING OF EVOLUTION WHICH SAYS FISH TURNED INTO REPTILES AND REPTILES TURNED INTO MAMMALS... (so whos right? i guess all wrong.. hahaha)
they are descended from ancient animals... which we do not see today...

kebot: hahaha, fail. Simple question... error becomes misunderstanding... too bad... lies become excuse... epic fail. So trip do you have answer to the BOLD QUESTION? I hope you are way better than dawkins this time...

YouTube - Richard Dawkins Is Stumped For 19 Seconds on Question- And Still Failed To Answer The Question!

this again *facepalm*


polyploidy, retro viral insertions, gene duplication errors
etc etc


read up dodong