Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[bluedes]

---

20$/hr basta ikaw. asa ka nga state sir bluedes kay adtoon tika? balik ko CA january maghouse to house ko


mobasa ra na sila'g ilang biased resources. naa may daghan independent resources ngano jud di basahon. bisag kato nalang college textbooks nato sa biology kay pwede pa gani tu.

naa ko GA ron.. karon december, mulaag ko... mugawas jud ko dre.. mura ta ug piniriso dre sige ug tuon..


its sad about creationism.. oh well.. tan-awn lng ni ron, in 5 years or so, kung unsa pa labas ani creationism..

[bluedes]

Thank you sir. i'm a proud christian but i am not ashamed of my convictions for evolution. i hope all christians will have an open mind and heart to study evolution. my dad who is a biogist-doctor and i are supporters of BioLogos Foundation (The BioLogos Foundation) - through this foundation we can unite science and christian faith.

gtg sa kow kay napa ko lakaw i will come back when i have time. thank you kaayo for allowing me to share my ideas.

God bless you all.

ingon ani pa lng ka kebz.. basa ug libro ba.. unya sabota pud..

mao bitaw Modern Evolutionary Synthesis tawag ana kay gi-synthesize na niya tanan findings sa science that support evolution, and discarding those na sayop.. ang darwin's theory (which you are debating about) lumang tugtugin na na kebz..

[cromagnon]

according to scientists

its not the the question of if evolution did happen ,.

but its the question if how evolution did happen.?

[cromagnon]

hahaha, its ok brad, scientist on the field says nothing has been found, its just a pieces of the puzzle... we will see what the puzzle will support... if those were real, then it can stand on its own... with or without us. These people here are trying hard to make an argument by countering our belief... well, i don't contest, its not my burden to prove it... so for me, i don't insist if my faith is right nor wrong... but these people insist so... lets keep asking... lets see how far they can go...

Yea im sure they are tired of presenting insufficient idea nor findings... again what they are presented are theory-after-theory. hahaha! its called, lies-after-lies. too bad, they still don't figure out they are trying hard to believe and reject the creator... well, if they use science.. then lets use science against them... afterall science is always there to prove and disprove what it is capable of....

so, Lets keep asking them a difficult question... we got one line to ask... they got one paragraph to answer... , who feels better? hmmm...

only scientist has the right to refute things.

[Malic]

Thank you sir. i'm a proud christian but i am not ashamed of my convictions for evolution. i hope all christians will have an open mind and heart to study evolution. my dad who is a biogist-doctor and i are supporters of BioLogos Foundation (The BioLogos Foundation) - through this foundation we can unite science and christian faith.

gtg sa kow kay napa ko lakaw i will come back when i have time. thank you kaayo for allowing me to share my ideas.

God bless you all.

great mind.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

@GER and YLINGAO ....

This will serve as your last warning . If you have nothing better to say other than riding on sarcstically within the outer boundaries of the dicussions much more on super off topics ... better keep it to yourselves .

[Sinyalan]

kebot is better than any scientists out there because he refutes them that all of those facts are lies. hmmm... would you exchange your knowledge and become un-evolved human like kebot? yes or no.

[Thugstaz Hustlaz]

guided natural selection sir and protein engineering can answer you. try search "directed evolution" sir kay the answers are there.

when you said: "It must also be true that RANDOM genetic changes generated useful material for natural selection, and those two ALONE are capable of creating organ systems -- THAT'S the real evidence gap. "

sir care to explain how you arrived with that conclusion on the evidence gap?

I am simply saying that physicalists assume physical rules have decided the genetic changes which led to organ systems. However, the luck of those mutations is not like the luck of normal physical change, so why is that aspect of evolution so readily accepted? - Thanks -

[Sinyalan]

^^ Imagine what would have happened if, over the history of science, we all imputed god's hand everything we didn't understand. We would never have cured the plague, which--like most diseases and disasters--was once thought to reflect god's anger rather than bacteria-carrying fleas. "Barrenness" in women was thought to reflect divine displeasure - it is now treated effectively by scientific means, not by propitiating the gods.

There are no observations in nature that refute Darwinism [creationists views], but there are plenty that refute creationist alternative. How does one explain the persistence of "dead genes" in species (like our own broken one for making vitamin C) genes that were functional in our ancestors? What explains those annoying hominin fossils that span the gap from early apelike creatures to modern humans? Why do human fetuses produce a coat of hair after six months in the womb, and then shed it before birth? Why didn't the "creator" stock oceanic islands with mammals, reptiles and amphibians? Why did "god" give vestigial ear muscles that have no function? Why do whales occasionally sprout hind legs? Did god design all creatures to fool us into thinking that they evolved?

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

^^ Imagine what would have happened if, over the history of science, we all imputed god's hand everything we didn't understand. We would never have cured the plague, which--like most diseases and disasters--was once thought to reflect god's anger rather than bacteria-carrying fleas. "Barrenness" in women was thought to reflect divine displeasure - it is now treated effectively by scientific means, not by propitiating the gods.

There are no observations in nature that refute Darwinism [creationists views], but there are plenty that refute creationist alternative. How does one explain the persistence of "dead genes" in species (like our own broken one for making vitamin C) genes that were functional in our ancestors? What explains those annoying hominin fossils that span the gap from early apelike creatures to modern humans? Why do human fetuses produce a coat of hair after six months in the womb, and then shed it before birth? Why didn't the "creator" stock oceanic islands with mammals, reptiles and amphibians? Why did "god" give vestigial ear muscles that have no function? Why do whales occasionally sprout hind legs? Did god design all creatures to fool us into thinking that they evolved?

kanay gi sulti nila na nasa Dios ang awa nasa tao ang gawa...