What's the greatest nba team in history?

[vahnhelsing]

---

celtics... how many banners gani?

pero kun era ang hisgotan, i would go for chicago, jordan era.

[MaInEvEnT]

Wala pa jud diay ni nag human o nagka husay? hehehehehe

[Sbek34]

If u count championship Boston(1 & Lakers(17) are in the front line.
But every decade its a different team/Team's..

60's & 70's - Boston ( Bulk of their championships )
1980's - Boston ( BIG 3 ), Lakers ( Show Time ) & Pistons ( Bad Boy's)
1990's - Bulls ( IF Jordan did not retire they could have won 8 in a row.. Hehe )
2000's - Lakers( SHAQ & kobe) & Spurs ( Admiral & TD then TD, TP & Manu )
2010's - ? Lakers (2) Dallas (1) Heat (1 & Counting ?)

[trollolol]

Huge upset yes, but they were a powerhouse from 95-96 to 96-97.

You call that team a powerhouse? LOL Historically as a team I doubt that 95-97 Seattle team would fall within the top 100 of all time. Yet you call them a powerhouse.

The Bulls were ill-equipped during the 80s, everyone knows they were a bad team with a great player--Pippen was a rookie in 88, no way they could win against the dynasties. Any Jordan fan will tell you the Bulls only became a real team during the 91 season, and that's when Jordan began to play his strongest, most mature basketball. And besides, Jordan went up against 2 to 3 defenders during 87 to 88. Bird didn't. Not saying Bird isn't up there with MJ though, but MJ's intangibles are what make him the better player compared to Magic and Bird.

And no, comparing Wilt and MJ isn't fair. Wilt played in an era where 7 footers dominated due to lack of competition. MJ's scoring titles> WIlt Chamberlain.

Jordan won his titles while the better teams were on a decline (Bird broken back, Jabbar retired, Magic HIV, Isaiah injured etc). FACT. Saying Pippen was the missing piece is easily debunked (Pistons). Saying Phil Jackson was the missing piece is easily debunked (Pistons again).

A more credible source on who was a better scorer would be someone who actually played against both. Jabbar said Wilt. Huhuhu it hurts I know.

Technically, Ewing was also the only HOFer on the Knicks. Besides Ewing, who couldn't solve Hakeem, the Knicks didn't play well in the finals.

Olajuwon>O Neal. In fact, Olajuwon>just about every other center in history. BTW, did you forget Drexler?

So teams playing one HOFer making the finals played in a stronger era while those playing more than 3 played in a weaker era ? Do you not hear basic logic and common sense knocking on the door whispering: "Nigg3r, that's some of the stupidist sheeet I have ever heard.... For reeelzzz."

Drexler joined only the second championship season. And they won only 48 games in the season. That should tell you about the era led by old people. Bird and Magic were king when they were at their early 20s but the nineties had the top teams sporting players in their early 30s. Bird and MAgic left so big a void that the weaker teams finally had their chance to go deeper during the playoffs.

You obsess over the Lakers and Pistons yet you forget that the Bulls would also go up against the incredibly underrated Phoenix and Portland in subsequent years. Detroit and LA may not have been at their best during the playoffs, but that still doesn't take away from the Bulls' 61-21 regular season record--besides, it's not like LA and Detroit were the only great teams.

They were underrated for good reason. The main reason being because they sucked. Barkley with better players in Philly couldn't do sh1t. Now paired with weaker teammates in a weaker era he reaches the finals. LOL

Of course I know it's from the Bible you dip shit. I had to Google that line because I couldn't remember where it's from. I just thought you'd have a better comeback than that. Kinda disappointed, thought you'd be a better troll.

So you already knew beforehand that the quote originally came from the Bible? Don't lie, you knew it when I told you or you would have quoted the more popular literature over the mediocre movie.

So now what, see you in 3 days? The Bulls were overrated. I am yet to be proven wrong on this simple fact.

72-10 in a weak era. 72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.

Read it and weep Bulls lovers.

[frontsideFLIP]

hahaha daghana mga sports analyst diri oi.. hahaha pag puyo mo oi.. ahaha

What's the greatest nba team in history?

Chicago Bulls 90's.. wa na moy mabuhat ana.. hahahaha history na na back to back 3peat! gkapoy nlng si uncle jordan kay wa nay lami ang duwa nga basketball niya.

ga golf2 nlng gani to gahapon nakit.an nako. hahahahaha

90's era is weak era jud para ni jordan kay wa may makakuha niya.. "he cant guard" -MJ haha

"Nba? basketball player?" = pabuhatag rebolto sa windy city ba jumpman.. ug wa pay laing player gbuhatag rebolto.

[m.garz]

tension is in the air right now

[King LeBron]

If u count championship Boston(1 & Lakers(17) are in the front line.
But every decade its a different team/Team's..

60's & 70's - Boston ( Bulk of their championships )
1980's - Boston ( BIG 3 ), Lakers ( Show Time ) & Pistons ( Bad Boy's)
1990's - Bulls ( IF Jordan did not retire they could have won 8 in a row.. Hehe )
2000's - Lakers( SHAQ & kobe) & Spurs ( Admiral & TD then TD, TP & Manu )
2010's - ? Lakers (2) Dallas (1) Heat (1 & Counting ?)

OT: Lakers fan ka bro? murag imo na lagi gi-predict makadaog ug 1 ring ang Lakers karon nga decade?

Kung wala ka nag-predict, then ayaw lang pasobrai kay mabirahan jud kas mga taga Celtics fans ana! hahahaha..

[King LeBron]

hehe.. asa nman to si TS.. ipa-klaro sa tani iyang point.. "greatest team in a single season" ba iyang pasabot ani nga thread? kay murag grabe na kaayo ang ka-init diri dah.. hehehe

but i have to admit though, i like the arguments presented by trollolol...

[cebugdev]

You call that team a powerhouse? LOL Historically as a team I doubt that 95-97 Seattle team would fall within the top 100 of all time. Yet you call them a powerhouse.



Jordan won his titles while the better teams were on a decline (Bird broken back, Jabbar retired, Magic HIV, Isaiah injured etc). FACT. Saying Pippen was the missing piece is easily debunked (Pistons). Saying Phil Jackson was the missing piece is easily debunked (Pistons again).

A more credible source on who was a better scorer would be someone who actually played against both. Jabbar said Wilt. Huhuhu it hurts I know.



So teams playing one HOFer making the finals played in a stronger era while those playing more than 3 played in a weaker era ? Do you not hear basic logic and common sense knocking on the door whispering: "Nigg3r, that's some of the stupidist sheeet I have ever heard.... For reeelzzz."

Drexler joined only the second championship season. And they won only 48 games in the season. That should tell you about the era led by old people. Bird and Magic were king when they were at their early 20s but the nineties had the top teams sporting players in their early 30s. Bird and MAgic left so big a void that the weaker teams finally had their chance to go deeper during the playoffs.



They were underrated for good reason. The main reason being because they sucked. Barkley with better players in Philly couldn't do sh1t. Now paired with weaker teammates in a weaker era he reaches the finals. LOL



So you already knew beforehand that the quote originally came from the Bible? Don't lie, you knew it when I told you or you would have quoted the more popular literature over the mediocre movie.

So now what, see you in 3 days? The Bulls were overrated. I am yet to be proven wrong on this simple fact.

72-10 in a weak era. 72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.72-10 in a weak era.

Read it and weep Bulls lovers.

although i agree with some of your comments but i dont agree with your repeated and somewhat immature comments of "..in a weak era", balikbalikon jd para makuha imo point?
anyway, declaring that era as a weak era is somewhat irresponsible and wrong, also an insults to those great teams back in the 90s who missed the chance because of the Bulls domination.
if motan.aw ka sa 90s game, daghan team na maayu in terms of teamplay, defense, etc. masapawan lang jd sa spotlight.

so if any of you knows how to look at TEAMS, it does not mean na because daghan superstars,
even MIAMI heat this season cannot be Declared a complete TEAM yet, without LBJ basin naa ra guro na cla sa 4th place or at the bottom of the playoff seed,
a good team is like the 2004 Pistons, they won the championship by teamwork and unselfish play, How bout the Spurs? even their bench can execute the system properly (hapit mapildi ang heat sa bench sa SPURS )

With teamwork, good defense, a perfect system for perfect players, it can be concluded that the 90s bulls is a good example of a complete team.
1. Defenders such as Pippen and Rodman, dont discount Jordan contribution to defense.
2. Rebounders like Longley, Rodman, Pippen, Jordan
3. Shooters like Kerr, Jordan, Pippen.
4. 6th man Kukuc can shoot and defend, a good backup for rodman and/or pippen.
5. Playmakers like Jordan, Pippen, Harper and of course Phil Jackson
6. If you know how triangle offense work, then you guys can conclude that the 90s bulls execute it perfectly.

ngano kana ra man na mga players ako gi mention? kay if you watch the 90s bulls game, Phil jackson only uses around 8 players per game,
that is the first 5 + 3 reserves, Jordan and Pippen plays Huge minutes per game.

and for you trollo, if you think that the 96 season is a weak season, and the 90s a weak era, then you dont know shit about the 90s or basketball in general.

[Blackbeard]

haha trollolol is actually right, he just expresses it in such an obnoxious way.

"We could not have won 70 games playing against 1980's teams."
-Dennis Rodman