^do we have to blame?
The president cites as an accomplishment having jailed her for corruption and even jokes about it in another country. Yet the cases filed are dropping one by one for lack of evidence. With all the resources available to them, they still couldn't pin her down. It will have positive effects once any form of corruption by any of those from the previous administration is prosecuted, proven and the guilty jailed. Wouldn't you want that too? But if it's all talk with no result, only the most rabid will believe this current administration is serious.
So, who's to blame again? Or should we just talk only of positive things?
blame Abnoy. are you happy now?
would i want it too?jailed? as i said, what i want is the truth. i know you want it also. that is why there are cases filed in order for us to know whether GMA is guilty or not. okay ra diay nimu ihilom ang tnang alegasyon? this is GMA's chance to clear herself of the allegation thrown against her. Cases filed are not meant that she is already guilty and deserved to be jailed. sugod pa lng gani prisohon dayun. ikaw ba.
This is not all talk anymore since there is already cases filed on court and it by time for GMA to defend her name. lets wait for the result as for now wla pa result since it is only at the starting stage. wait and see lng ta.
i dont want to call you such but there are bits of a Pro GMA in you![]()
Why are you blaming your president? It was DOJ who built up the cases, not the president? You are not being reasonable.
Did I say nga ihilum ang allegations? They're all over. My point is the DOJ seems to be remiss in their gathering of evidences hence the dismissals. They are putting the president in bad light (with his declarations of having stopped/minimized corruption) by being haphazard with their work and not securing convictions. The PCSO case, if you read the case files and analyze the facts presented, you will realize it is also weak so DOJ should build it up more to get a conviction that the guilty deserve.
Like you, I also want the truth. Jail the guilty, and free the innocent. Stop the trials by publicity.
And please stop this pro/anti thingy. That does not reinforce your argument at all.
Last edited by eezychair; 10-24-2012 at 05:58 PM.
Back to the drawing board sila Pnoy. Unsa pa mai kaso isagpa ani nilang Arroyo?
Plunder ilaha gi file nga Case aron ma preso ... non bailable ... pa pogi points aron ingnon na preso nila ang Corrupt ... pero ning backfire kay walay ebedinsiya ... klaro kaau nga persecution ug pa pogi points ...
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/10...ues-tro-arroyo
The SC issues a TRO stopping the Arraignment of the former president for the charge of plunder. Is this really about the competence of the Ombudsman and the DOJ or is there really a solid case against the former president? PNoy has been declaring the former presidents's guilt in his speeches while abroad and even cracked the wheelchair joke. But this development makes him the real joke! What is wrong with the DOJ? Are they doing their job right? They are embarassing the president.
Sorry, double post.
Wa pamay klarong balita bro unsay rason na TRO ... most likely no probable cause .. klaro kaaung Persecution mao na ang gi file nga kaso nga Plunder aron mapreso jud .. pahiya napud ....
Business as usual in Noy
Kini ay nindot ni nga balita .. business as usual sa Pnoy Admin ... corruption and etc .....
Similar Threads |
|