Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

---

three groups diri na thread...

so naa three groups diri na thread or sayop ka kapoy basa sa inyong mga post na uban...

1. evolutionist (full)
*para nila ni evolve ang taw and all other living organism... and patuloy na nag-eevolve ang taw and other living ogranism...
*dli mutuo sa naa designer behind sa evolution..
*dili ma-reconcile ang biblical accounts ug scientific evidences on evolution.. (kay dili man sila mutu-o sa bible)

2. creationist (full)
*believes the evolution theory is false.
*God created human as human.. dili na ni agi ug any process...
*although mu-agree sila sa concept of natural selection...
*dili mareconcile ang biblical account ug scientific evidences on evolution (kay unthinkable para nila na nakahuhuna ang Ginoo na mu-agi ta as amoeba before naging taw...)

3. evolutionist-creationist
*mutuo sila na ni evolve, ni agi ug evolution process ang taw and other living organism
*but there is a "god" or designer behind the whole process of evolution.
*para nila.. ma reconcile ang biblical accounts on creation and scientific evidences on evolution.
(mga peace loving gyud ni na mga taw... no conflicts... everything is connected.. )

naa koy nakalimtan?

[Thugstaz Hustlaz]

@Thugstaz
there is no such word as "evolutionist".
thats like calling someone who believes in the gravitational theory a gravitationist.

Only creationist would use such a term

where'd you get the verse?

There are 2 types of evolutionist ,. theistic and naturalistic.
And im talking about the (hardcore) naturalistic when i speak evolutionist., not with s.

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

where'd you get the verse?

There are 2 types of evolutionist ,. theistic and naturalistic.
And im talking about the naturalistic one when i speak evolutionist., not with s.

ah eto pala yung correct grouping....ng mga evolutionist.... sige expalin daw... yung pinaka mdali...

[chad_tukes]

Ur entering an empty room i am not creationist..

It doesn't matter what I believe. I don't care if there is a god, if I am a robot, if I am nothing but a dream in a psychotic's mind. I want facts from researchers, but instead, I get theory represented as fact, gaps in the theory glossed over, contrary indications to a pet theory "dismissed," and religion-hater strategies designed to keep religion out of the discussion.

watchu talkin bawt dawg...

i suggest you read "The Greatest Show on Earth" by Richard Dawkins and come back so you'd start making sense.

[tripwire]

dont be such a buttlicker.

This is a good example of "crab mentality". I'd rather exchange good discussion with you if you show a little bit of maturity.

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

my friend who is bio grad once told me that life is actually amazing.. see theoretically women can actually get their self pregnant without fertilization...and i learned from watching an episode of dr.house its called parthogenesis...

as of the present there is no known cases of parthogenesis among mammals except with those with the help of scientists... ummm... but if you're a firm believer of the virgin birth then MAry could fall under the category as a known case...

Actually men should be thankful there is a God imagine if there is none and women evolve into hermaphrodite... or genogynetic...

imagine evolution in these cases of parthogenic animals....

[tripwire]

^^ Test tube babies are also synonymous to parthogenesis.

Besides, where is the fun with that?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

^^^^

OT : Thats more I like it . A break from both sides and having fun . Intelligent people are too serious lately .

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

^^ Test tube babies are also synonymous to parthogenesis.

Besides, where is the fun with that?

nope.. kase diba sa testube babies andun pa rin yung sperm and egg... with parthogenesis "egg" lang...

bitaw sad... ingon sa Da Vinci code kay sa *** act kay makit-an nimo ang face ni God.. ingon sad sa ako religon teacher kay kana nagpabuhat na god sad ta kay through *** we can create...

[Malic]

"To a cup that is already full, nothing can be added"