
Originally Posted by
æRLO
A king does not have a "job". He rules and he lives off his dominion. He does not necessarily need the approval of his subjects--he asserts his mandate on them, and his strength willing he can oppress them so as long as he keeps them subjugated. So it is a title, passed on from kin to next. The Emperor of Japan? Unsa may trabaho niya bai besides the essence of the dynasty itself, since the Meiji restoration wala naman silay real purpose na gani. They are public figures--TITLES with PR purposes. For the sake of prolonging the oldest continuous hereditary monarchy in history and keeping to the essence and spirit of Japan.
You are just playing with words, but still has the same meaning. I can also suggest "servant" to your list...

Originally Posted by
æRLO
Mao ra nah imu argument? dissect and infer?
You can't correct history.
So again support your argument.
If you are referring to events and mistakes in our history, yes you cannot change and correct it for you may not able to turn back time. However, what we can do is to correct our facts and records about it for future generations knowledge.