The Nikon D90 or The Canon 550D?

[tattee]

---

Canon Rebel T2i / EOS 550D Compared to the Nikon D90 Side by Side

Summary: D90 is better!

[senseii]

asa mas nice paliton d90 with 18-55mm kit lens or kadtong 18-105

[chew.esmero]

if kaigo imo money sa 105, go for the 105 kay mas versatile ang range. pareha sila wide range for landscapes but the longer end of 105 can be useful if you'll venture into portraits and street/candid photography. hehe.

[senseii]

if kaigo imo money sa 105, go for the 105 kay mas versatile ang range. pareha sila wide range for landscapes but the longer end of 105 can be useful if you'll venture into portraits and street/candid photography. hehe.

cge2 sir thanks kaau i'll go for that one

[tattee]

Wow congrats! Pa PM nya kng asa nimo paliton imo D90 if u don't mind and how much ky plan sad ko palit. hehe..Thanks!

[dlanyer77]

mas nindot ang MINOLTA OR KODAK. hehehe!

[chew.esmero]

depende ra jud na sa mogamit..

Though I agree with this statement, di kaayo to the extreme pod. Di ko tanto mahiluna basta makacome across ko ug ingon ani na mga statements if dili ko makareact gamay. hehe. Anyway, opinion lang man pod. Para to give a broader perspective sa mga readers...

In as much as we love photography, we are not really complete without our cameras. There is really this invisible bond between the photographer and his gadgets. And the better gadgets you have for the job, there is always greater room/possibilities for greater output, given na gigamit nimo ang gadget to its fullest potential. And many other reasons pa pd. Mao dili jud ko totally agree sa argument. Hehe. For me, when it comes to photography output, mostly depende ra jud na sa mugamit, and partly sa unsa pod ang gigamit.

[Pakapin: I definitely could take my photography to the next level (with ease) with a Nikon D3S than my EOS 50D right now. =)]

[Chipmunk888]

Though I agree with this statement, di kaayo to the extreme pod. Di ko tanto mahiluna basta makacome across ko ug ingon ani na mga statements if dili ko makareact gamay. hehe. Anyway, opinion lang man pod. Para to give a broader perspective sa mga readers...

In as much as we love photography, we are not really complete without our cameras. There is really this invisible bond between the photographer and his gadgets. And the better gadgets you have for the job, there is always greater room/possibilities for greater output, given na gigamit nimo ang gadget to its fullest potential. And many other reasons pa pd. Mao dili jud ko totally agree sa argument. Hehe. For me, when it comes to photography output, mostly depende ra jud na sa mugamit, and partly sa unsa pod ang gigamit.

[Pakapin: I definitely could take my photography to the next level (with ease) with a Nikon D3S than my EOS 50D right now. =)]

agree.

although all dslr are capable of making great photos, higher model can give a user more convenient experience in making a photo.

thats why i accede to dslr buyer to get the highest model that he/she can afford, wether he/she is a beginner or has an advanced skill in photography.

[jidduv]

imho gear is important but it's secondary to developing your skill as a photographer. I'm still a newbie but I can definitely say that if you put a decent point and shoot in my hand I can shoot some images that kick my ass from when I first picked up my DSLR. Focus, color, noise and dof are limiting factors but I can look at a scene and know if this is going to be crap or not. I can't tell if it'll make a good picture yet but I can tell when it's going to be really bad.

[senseii]

will be buying my first dslr karon.. im going for the d90... thanks ani nga thread ^_6