I believe in God but I hate the church...

[munzter666]

---

but the lack of evidence which warrants the faith card...used as evidence? com'on.

[munzter666]

ack ack ack

[chad_tukes]

It is always been our nature to be hypothetical, science does as well, but as always we have that ethusiasm and curiosity in exploring what should be factual and true. GOD gave us intellect to understand things and perhaps a bestowed tool to know him as well.

come on dude, you're making it sound like FAITH can do wonders. our ancestors once thought the earth was flat, but dammit, how flat the earth was indeed---and the generation gap between these explorers and the Bible authors is pretty slim. it was even documented in the Bible... erm, "the corners of the earth"... ring a bell? how dangerous it can be to trust FAITH without evidence. it's ok to have faith in something but you gotta remember, FAITH can only do so much.

[Tirong-say]

but the lack of evidence which warrants the faith card...used as evidence? com'on.

Limited capacity had limited grasp towards gaining profound evidences, do we have solid evidence as of now that string theory is really factual.........or the medieval atom of the big bang did really exist before. At the moment what we have are just conjectures no more no less.

[Tirong-say]

come on dude, you're making it sound like FAITH can do wonders. our ancestors once thought the earth was flat, but dammit, how flat the earth was indeed---and the generation gap between these explorers and the Bible authors is pretty slim. it was even documented in the Bible... erm, "the corners of the earth"... ring a bell? how dangerous it can be to trust FAITH without evidence. it's ok to have faith in something but you gotta remember, FAITH can only do so much.

Yeah what about you consider false now is really true after all. Well we know what is righteous and what is not do we?. FAITH in something that is pro-life and rigteous is not really dangerous.

[chad_tukes]

Yeah what about you consider false now is really true after all. Well we know what is righteous and what is not do we?. FAITH in something that is pro-life and rigteous is not really dangerous.

it's a mystery which will remain a mystery unless we don't stop inquiring, which RELIGION and FAITH are very good at doing the opposite.

[munzter666]

Limited capacity had limited grasp towards gaining profound evidences, do we have solid evidence as of now that string theory is really factual.........or the medieval atom of the big bang did really exist before. At the moment what we have are just conjectures no more no less.

since when did science claim ABSOLUTES? it never did. :]

RELIGION does. and fails time to time. epic failures with only a whisper of sorry we were wrong centuries late and overdue.

...and every time they REVISE the word of gawd according to the infallible DUDE. what does that make of thy god?? a sock puppet.

[munzter666]

FAITH in something that is pro-life and rigteous is not really dangerous.

tell that to the likes of MOSES and Abraham..pro-life?? dont think so.

[Tirong-say]

since when did science claim ABSOLUTES? it never did. :]

RELIGION does. and fails time to time. epic failures with only a whisper of sorry we were wrong centuries late and overdue.

...and every time they REVISE the word of gawd according to the infallible DUDE. what does that make of thy god?? a sock puppet.

Well we humans are a facet of failures for we are not so perfect, Science and Religion are there not to be censured but to be used, somehow the failure is attributed to the misuse. The atomic bomb perhaps.........

[Tirong-say]

it's a mystery which will remain a mystery unless we don't stop inquiring, which RELIGION and FAITH are very good at doing the opposite.

Yeah, for me a religion that invokes love,humility,happiness, and other good attributes is the religion that one should adhere with.