Originally Posted by
chris_bern
You are talking about formula of success and you make manny pacquiao as a bad example of your success formula? wala ka nagkamali ug formulate ana?
Wala na nasayop bai. Any endeavor that has a low success rate is considered a failed endeavor. In short, NOT SUCCESSFUL.
Mosugot ka anang toyota na 1:80million cars ra ang modagan? And ang presyo is 1.1million? Mopalit ba ka ug product with that low degree of quality control? That's the same thing. This may not be a product but a formula for success (as what I am trying to extract from your explanation). A formula with a very low success rate. So meaning this idea is not effective. It needs to be replaced with something else. Something with bigger odds because making 1 filipino successful out of 80m is not a very good solution, is it? Basically, kita nagpadatu ni pacman. Pila man ang nibalik nato anang pagpakaon anang pamilya niya, aber?
But i don't get why you are pointing out him as an example to educate himself while at the same time claiming that our education system is a failure. So my understanding now is you're mixing a success (pacman) with a failure (education). Unsa man ang resulta ana?
Sorry but wala ko kagets ana na part.