Originally Posted by
Romeojin
mao kay dugay man ka kasabot. ingon ko kahit naay corruption pwede moasenso kay depende man gihapon sa gobyerno ma influence ng gobyerno ang GDP. wa ko nag-ingon ok ang corruption.
kay para sa imo dili daw ta moasenso kung naay corruption... which you cant back.
unsa man allegation ni PJ ron ? basin about ni Gwen na pud
amahan gani DVD naa gihapon corruption allegation when CJ siya.
bro, if you are against corruption, then say so. Ayaw anang style nga libog libogon nimo mga tawo kay mura kag garcia ana. tuyoon ug libog ang klaro na kaayo. mura bag gibogoan nalang jud ba. if according to you a country can develop despite the presence of corruption, then you can only imagine how it would fare without the corruption.
Also, time and again it has been ruled: "what is prohibited directly is prohibited indirectly!". Have you ever heard of the term: circumvention of the law? Well, this is what this rule is for. With that in hindsight, it would utterly be foolish to insist PJ is innocent, would it not? While gwen may be the one directly involved, her counselor, from whom she gets all her legal advices, is also indirectly involved somehow. Why, i woudn't at all be surprised if PJ would be indicted as principal by inducement, and gwen as principal by direct participation.