Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

Evo started from dust? REAAALLLLYYYYY?!?!?!

post your sources. until you do, then Sinyalan is right---pure assumptions.

Weee! YOU JUST FELL FOR IT.

--- of course Evolution is based on assumption. Thats the same question we kept asking by the way... don't worry chad you are learning...
--- evo said the earth cooldown and it rain... so do we have to require them to post their sources? hmmm... i wonder if they can provide one...
--- golden rule chad fyi:
gravity + rock + water = possibility of life.

[kebotDiNaMute]

go ahead believe...im not contesting. what's so hard about your biology? im sure we can find it in a creationist's book.

I bore you? nice excuse and a very graceful exit.



hahaha, really and what's with the Cap?

im not contesting.
--- hahahha, but you kept asking... you kept telling him its wrong... hahaha! then now you said not contesting... hahaha... its always been an obligation if you insist... otherwise...

[schmuck]

Yes I received a MBA University of Houston 1980 but jobs were scarce and I joined the Marines 1981, could have been an Officer but chose to be Enlisted because I would hate being saluted. After I was discharged from the Marine Corps MOS 8541/2822 I was offered reeducation (GI bill), I attended Texas A&M Biology program received Biology M,S. 1989, Started working for NASA Summer school Workers program 1988, was employed full time 1989.

While working at NASA completed my Botany M.S. Texas A&M (satellite school program) 1994 While still employed at NASA, they have an excellent continuing education program which allow workers to regularly attend college courses.

I started a horticultural business, my wife operated it for 3 years and I devoted all my free time to the business. I stayed employed at NASA, we had a new baby and a house mortgage, needed the insurance and income security. Then I left NASA in fall of 1999. I remember because NASA was scrambling over that Y2K thing, because they have a lot of computers. I applied my MBA and Botany training into a very profitable business and decided to retire on my 50th birthday. My family and I moved to Surigao City in October of last year. We run a 6-1/2 hector farm and several other small businesses and even have a small food carryout stand. Best food in the city and priced low enough that the locals can afford to eat there. We want get rich, but we help a lot of people. That is rewarding enough for me.

Here is a secret about how to have a happy life:
It is not important having everything you want, rather it is wanting what you have.

I love it here, and know that this is were I will spend the rest of my life, if my wife does not kill me first...

cool story bro
anyway, the reason I asked you if you were really a biologist/botanist is because of what is below.
Please explain the text in bold.

That is all we real scientist have right now is just opinions. This subject pushes the boundaries which are known and can be proven, so do not be angry that I can not answer what can not be proven. If science could actually prove there was no God, that the bible was fake, and evolution was Law, then there would not be 66 pages on this Forum of debate.

[kebotDiNaMute]

that's your opinion but we need to ask real science.

ka faet malic. Is science exclusive to non-believers.. don't take that away from us... its called descrimination.... because you beleive we are inferior.. hahaha sorry malic, thats how evolution affect your thinking.

You see, all professionals practicing science is entitled to thier opinion, hopefully backed up by facts... James gave his opinion backed up by science. If you tell him his idea does not qualify for REAL SCIENCE, then think again. What you are trying to avoid is that fact that when he relates the creators hand working in Biology. tsk tsk tsk. Bad habit as a result of EVO THINKING?

[kebotDiNaMute]

cool story bro
anyway, the reason I asked you if you were really a biologist/botanist is because of what is below.
Please explain the text in bold.

warning: this is not directed to you smak ha /ignorelist

i want to react the 66 pages.

In Our dogma its call "PRODUCING ITS OWN KIND".
-- cat produce cat
-- dog produce dog
-- tree produce tree

In evolution concept
-- cat produce new specie STILL A CAT (OBSERVED)
-- dog produce new specie STILL DOG (OBSERVED)
-- non man produce new specie MAN (ardi?) (ASSUMPTION) - FAKE/NOT VERIFIED
-- evolution is "PRODUCING ITS OWN KIND AND WILL PRODUCE A NON-KIND"
-- what we have been up against is AND WILL PRODUCE A NON-KIND. So, who want to contest?

[kebotDiNaMute]

just answer the question pls. what's the difference between your God and Zeus? what made you think that other Gods are myth and yours is not?


sorry again james but im not that type of muslim anymore. Iblis(Satan) exist in your world only not mine.



then try harder. but the point is, i never said anything about you to use biology to prove what cannot be explain.



if it would lead to a healthier discussions then why not? but don't expect me to be soft in my defense against your creationist point of view.

just answer the question pls. what's the difference between your God and Zeus? what made you think that other Gods are myth and yours is not?

--- Zeus tells us about atlas, and it is wrong. If dogma is proven wrong then it cease to exist. Thats the way it is bro.

sorry again james but im not that type of muslim anymore. Iblis(Satan) exist in your world only not mine.

--- im happy to know that your faith is muslim is not strong as before... you must have noticed something is not RIGHT. Its a start bro.

i never said anything about you to use biology to prove what cannot be explain.

--- if science cannot explain all things how much more to the one who created? Same principle, looking at different perspective... keep thinking evolutionist...

[Malic]

im not contesting.
--- hahahha, but you kept asking... you kept telling him its wrong... hahaha! then now you said not contesting... hahaha... its always been an obligation if you insist... otherwise...

naa na pod ng logic nimo nga pinalupad? kanang mga pangutana diha kebot is meant to established a logical belief. dili diay ka mangutana abot sa faith sa osa ka tao? butangi...

unsaon man pag abot og maayong conclusion kong di ka mangutana, hahayz...ingna lang jud nga gusto ka mobalos, hahaha.

i kept telling him nga sayop siya? asa man? im only giving two opposing views kebots. basin di ka kasabot ana, basin kinahanglan pa ka og telescope para ma conclude nimo nga daghan ang stars sa langit.

ka faet malic. Is science exclusive to non-believers.. don't take that away from us... its called descrimination.... because you beleive we are inferior.. hahaha sorry malic, thats how evolution affect your thinking.

huh? lupad na pod ka, pataka napod ka og sabot? ka paetz kebot. pagtoon sa og basa.

kita diay ka sa akog utok kay ingon man ka nga "I think" referring nako, mga inferior mo, tokar na pod ng pagka lagpas nimo. wala ko gahuna huna ana, kong mao na imonng gibati karon nga inferiror mo, aw di nana nako sala.

You see, all professionals practicing science is entitled to thier opinion, hopefully backed up by facts... James gave his opinion backed up by science. If you tell him his idea does not qualify for REAL SCIENCE, then think again. What you are trying to avoid is that fact that when he relates the creators hand working in Biology. tsk tsk tsk. Bad habit as a result of EVO THINKING?

paeta nimo kebz. sige man gud ka og too anang magic sa genesis. mao ng imong mga interpretation sa akong mga gi png sulti lagpas kaayo.

basaha kuno og osab kong mao ba na pasabot nako. hahaha, ka lagpas. ingon ko iya pod ng opinyon pero adto ta mangutana sa tinood nga science, katong ni agi na og proseso ba og na aprobahan sa mga community. getz naka? ayaw lagi sigeg too anang creation kay maka b0g0.

[Malic]

--- Zeus tells us about atlas, and it is wrong. If dogma is proven wrong then it cease to exist. Thats the way it is bro.

tarunga ng imong storya oi. ka paet anang one liner. elaborate pa na, hadlok ka?

--- im happy to know that your faith is muslim is not strong as before... you must have noticed something is not RIGHT. Its a start bro.

not as strong as before? hahahahaha, gahuna huna na pod ka og tao nga wala diha. kinsa man na kebot? kinsa ng tao diha nga imong gislti nga not as strong as before? hahaha imbento napod na nimo, hahay creationist.

--- if science cannot explain all things how much more to the one who created? Same principle, looking at different perspective... keep thinking evolutionist...

wa ko kasabot sa imong mga one liner oi. yes i always think. hinaot ko nga ikaw pod unta. kay kinahanglan pa ka og telescope para ma conclude nimo nga daghang mga bitoon sa kalangitan. hahahahaha try harder. gusto ka mobalos hahaha try harder.

[schmuck]

warning: this is not directed to you smak ha /ignorelist

i want to react the 66 pages.

In Our dogma its call "PRODUCING ITS OWN KIND".
-- cat produce cat
-- dog produce dog
-- tree produce tree

In evolution concept
-- cat produce new specie STILL A CAT (OBSERVED)
-- dog produce new specie STILL DOG (OBSERVED)
-- non man produce new specie MAN (ardi?) (ASSUMPTION) - FAKE/NOT VERIFIED
-- evolution is "PRODUCING ITS OWN KIND AND WILL PRODUCE A NON-KIND"
-- what we have been up against is AND WILL PRODUCE A NON-KIND. So, who want to contest?

excuse me, but is your name jamesmusslewhite?
"kind" is not a scientific term used in evolution. It is invented by ignorant creationists. Prove me wrong.

[vahnhelsing]

daghana nasobraan sa kabright uy....