sori
I dnt know the technique considering it was develop by the americans back 1970.That form of martial art was originally in the Philippines and it was very lethal and deadly.Originally Posted by Michbern
kung pow!... aikido i like..
nyc nyc... il try to get into this when i have tym
[quote="patrixxx73"]I certainly agree with you on the point of Technicalities between the two forms of Martial Art. Though some of of the Techniques in Aikido more specifically body positioning and the method of unbalancing the opponent, largely differs. Some of the Aikijujutsu techniques, are refined in Aikido for gracefulness and practicality reasons but the effectiveness is more or less the same. But one thing that is greatly differs is on the "Philosophy". Aikijujutsu mainly focus on the "Practicality and Effectiveness ", which I personally confirmed is really necessary for it was taught among combatants/soldiers. And the art is not so concern with the long term adverse effect. In Aikido each individual is treated very delicately and that absolutely the reason why we are strongly advised not to use excessive force only the recommended minimal force just to suppress the opponent. Causing him the least physical damage.Originally Posted by Michbern
Technically speaking, some of the techniques in Aikido when implied with excessive force on the nage's part, it is actually Aikijujutsu at work. In Aikijujutsu, opponents were percieved as "life takers". In Aikido the uke is "a learning oppurtunity" ,hence it is difficult to see the combat effectiveness and practicality of Aikido in our dojo. So in real life situations, it's really up to an Aikidoka wether he/she will use Aikijujutsu or Aikido, the choice is upon the Aikidoka. Philisophically, all Aikido Sensei's doesn't imperatively brainwashed an Aikidoka as to exclusively use Aikido, an Aikidoka's free will still supercedes. But so far, I haven't heared an Aikidoka used other Martial Arts, other than his/her beloved Discipline, even when confronted with a life threatining situation.
Ang pinaka-maayo na martial art kay ang pagkig-away na walay away na mahitabo! Na-SAYOD Mo?!!!
Are you trying to say that the "Best Martial Art", is something that told you not to initiate, evade from fist fights, street fights for that matter? I am very certain that all Martial Arts never encourage us(Martial Arts students) to do that, our Discipline is absolutely reserve for self-defense and not "ego-booster". If what you are trying to say, is how to fight an enemy and resolving the conflict, without physical contact, I guess you're talking about "telekenisis". So far, I haven't heared of a Martial Art which uses telekenisis.Originally Posted by SaYoD_KAa?!!!
Would you mind telling me, what is that? Or perhaps your "Discipline"?
what's the best martial art to learn survival defense as well as weapon mastery? pref. japanese origin..
this is the line --------- cross it. i dare you
Ang tawo kay rational and logical in nature... Mas maayo kung gamiton niya ang iyang utok sa pag-rason og huna-huna og maayo sa mga sitwasyon na mahitabo. Kung molikay sa mga da-otan na sitwasyon dili ka masakitan og dili pod ka makasakit og tawo.Originally Posted by Persian_King73
The Art of Fighting without a fight? Hmmm, interesting! A philosopher's way..... True, but it depends on the situation... If you are cornered and your life is at stake (or the lives of other people) and you've tried that option (which is evading and reasoning) but still your life is threatened; Would you still do that? Martial Arts is basically a self defense, a means and way of preserving peace, harmony and preserving your life (and the lives of others as well.)Originally Posted by SaYoD_KAa?!!!
Similar Threads |
|