MERGED: Osama Bin Laden is dead.. (White House confirms)

[reptoid]

---

^ That's a funny, funny movie!

[Vince Russo]

So you never heard of the Afghanistan War? The Iraq War? >_>

I again ask you to cite your source. I researched it thoroughly before making my initial comment, and you are WAY off with your ridiculous statement. You're a dishonest fabricator of misinformation, dude. A complete joke.

[noy.juan]

Bin Laden is killed by Joint Operation of Jack Bauer and the Unit

still for me, ikapila na nila gi ingon namatay si bin laden.... and this time they said it again, im not closing the possibility nga namatay jud siya, but still US already cried wolf a couple of times... im not sure if im gonna jump on euphoria on bin laden's death....

beside terrorism is not a one headed dragon..

[makie]

How many times does Bin Laden have to die?
He's got 9 lives!

[ju-Luis]

tungod cguro aning mga CIA, FBI etc. na mga movies ba, maka-cause na hnuon og doubts prmi ukng naay mahitabo na extraordinary. mao na sa ato mind pirmi, palabas ra ni, mag-libog na hinuon ta if tnuod ba or dili.

[johnjob]

neutral mode for now...basin pila ka days mugawas napod si BL live na live hehehe....

[gareb]

Bin Laden was notorious because of his own actions. I don't understand why people are trying to read so much into this. A very bad man is dead and a lot of people (mainly Americans) are relieved and happy at the news which is perfectly understandable.

yes, it is perfectly understandable. but it is also a perfectly superficial take on things; and we know for a fact that in world affairs, particularly how the US handles its political and economic interests, nothing is a simple as it looks.

his notoriety is bad enough; this is a very valid point. but stopping there would make us miss the bigger picture; what radicalized him, who supplied his arms and intelligence during the proxy Soviet-Afghan war.

not to mention how the US took advantage of his notoriety to launch its 'war on terror' that for a while threatened the entire world into the brink of being polarized, slapping the label of 'terrorist' against whoever tries to oppose its foreign policy, no matter how divergent the ideology or the cause.

for a hero to be called as such, he needs to find a villain worthy of being fought against. after he has vanquished it, he needs to find another villain again and again so that people around him will rally to his flag, maintain his position and justify whatever action that he will take, no matter how equally notorious, or equally unrelated to the fight, so as to position himself as the hero and claim the spoils later on.

once upon a time it was the USSR, then Fidel Castro, then Muammar Gadhafi, then Osama Bin Laden. again, should we be expecting Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong Il? they seem to be the only ones left.

[DeathFox]

I again ask you to cite your source. I researched it thoroughly before making my initial comment, and you are WAY off with your ridiculous statement. You're a dishonest fabricator of misinformation, dude. A complete joke.

so your saying those wars don't exist and no lives were lost? don't you even know how to use google? >_> dumbass

[prestige]

Was burying bin Laden at sea a mistake? - Yahoo! News

[doi]

well Im sad he is dead.
.

wow! you're sad over a dead terrorist. *smh*