i'm really tired arguing w/ you cause we can't seem to get in a same tune together but we can always agree to disagree.. right?
i'm really tired arguing w/ you cause we can't seem to get in a same tune together but we can always agree to disagree.. right?
Juanma was getting so careless and over confident on his fight with Bernabe... Maybe he under estimated salido... Pugsit nuun... heheh~
YouTube - Orlando Salido vs J.M. Lopez highlights
nindota sa fight oi. luoya ni juan ma. same style pa ka pildi ni banal. body shots
Boxing is a dying sport? I've heard that since 10 years ago, maybe more.. If it was dying, it should have been dead by now.. I'm not even going to touch on MMA as a subject.
I NEVER said Berto was a quitter, and especially not after the fight with Ortiz. I said fights fans labeled ORTIZ "quitter".. not Berto.. Yeah, Berto won vs. Quintana officially, but not in my eyes.
About Calzaghe and Marciano, please pay attention.. maybe I got this wrong when I posed the question if you consider them great fighters. I thought I agreed that they were great fighters because they are or will be (in case of Calzaghe) Hall of Famers. But an ALL TIME GREAT? Calzaghe? Really?
The winning thing you got all twisted. OF COURSE everybody has the mindset to win, who argued about that? NOBODY gets in that ring expecting to lose, except maybe if a fight is fixed. But winning isn't everything. A lot of fighters lose officially but end up winners to fight fans. Some winners, like Adrien Broner (ever heard of him? the guy who last fought Daniel Ponce de Leon?) end up losing because of their poor performance. That's the METAPHOR bro!
and YES, I dare say it.. if you fight the best out there, a BIG possibility is you are going to lose some.. Look up the history of boxing and TELL ME if you find an ALL TIME GREAT fighter who fought the best of the best out there and left unscathed? Name me ONE All time great that did not lose a fight? And forget Marciano.. he did not have the chance to lose because his career was so short, it spanned only 8 years..
Morales was not robbed. He lost a close fight that could have gone either way. Examples of robbery are Peņalosa-deLeon, Casamayor-Sta. Cruz among others.. Losing a competitive fight is no robbery, just like how Marquez lost to Pacquiao.
Arguing with you seems to be a regular thing already and I'm also tired of it. We are both boxing nuts with totally different perspectives. I guess we will never be on the same page.. and its pointless to argue anymore. I'm not doing this for the sake of argument, but this really is my opinion and I believe it the same with you. So keep yours and I'll keep mine.
Let's just sit back, and enjoy these fights. Next week will be another good one for the sport!
And I'll leave you with a quote from Doug Fischer:
"They may never admit it to you, but your MMA friends know that when boxing is at its best NOTHING can compare to it."
dako ra kaayo si Ortiz para kang Berto no? maskin si Ortiz ang nisaka ug timbang pero mas dako jud siya kaysa ni Berto.
Comment lang ko gamay about sa argument sa taas...
Boxing is not a dying sport. Yes it had and will have its down times when there is no one worth watching like post-Ali and post-Tyson era, but there will always be an exciting fighter that will rise. Always.
After Pacquiao maybe there will be 'famine in the land'. But I'm positive there will be another set of exciting fighters. Maybe not with the caliber of Pacquiao but at least someone worth watching.
Similar Threads |
|