Prostitution To Be Legalized...Pabor ba mo?

[yiennahs]

---

go to BIR and claim back your tax. lol......

On a serious note, daghan pa mahitabo dili lang kani.

hahaha anyways ugma naku padayun kay i gotta go, thank you all esp to cliff_drew, Eve's Apple Project ug TheInfidel

[cliff_drew]

We are discussing prostitution. The government can make a law just for its sole purpose.

Legal work will always be subject for regulations kay kung dili - pwede pa diay katrabaho ako silingan nga tigulang sa call center kung ingon ana lang ang storya.

We are talking about regulation about forcing of parents to their kin in prostitution, we are not talking about the requirements to being an approve prostitute.

[Eve's Apple Project]

i have question....

ex nalegalize na ang prostitution
and then u said yes to the cutomer
but then u found out he is saddistic
u want to say no
but still the customer wanted it and the act is done
and ur so shock
but then u cant defend urself anymore because its LEGAL
and now u want to complain and go for an attorney
but ur poor
and now what?

nice example miss...well, you can file for rape? labi nag dili nimo dawaton ang money..so noexchage was made..btaw,there so be a discussion between the prosti & customer. if not, then naabuse naka..

[Eve's Apple Project]

We are talking about regulation about forcing of parents to their kin in prostitution, we are not talking about the requirements to being an approve prostitute.

if that will happen (if educated na ang anak) then ang anak pwede na mo fiel og complaint against the parents (ideally, bisan karon pwede naman unta sila mo file). we have existing laws about voilence against women & children or VOWC...karon palang piti na ang parents..bad parenting..wehehe

[TheInfidel]

hahaha anyways ugma naku padayun kay i gotta go, thank you all esp to cliff_drew, Eve's Apple Project ug TheInfidel

You're welcome

We are talking about regulation about forcing of parents to their kin in prostitution, we are not talking about the requirements to being an approve prostitute.

Then I have already answered your question. This isn't a simple matter in which you can simply compare a prostitute with a factory worker. The government can impose special laws to prostitution. Do you honestly think P-noy would stand up in front of everyone and say "Hey guys! Prostitution is now legal so if you have daughters who are very much qualified, kindly force them to become one."

Go figure.

[Eve's Apple Project]

You're welcome



Then I have already answered your question. This isn't a simple matter in which you can simply compare a prostitute with a factory worker. The government can impose special laws to prostitution. Do you honestly think P-noy would stand up in front of everyone and say "Hey guys! Prostitution is now legal so if you have daughters who are very much qualified, kindly force them to become one."

Go figure.

Add lang nako bai: there you have it, ang rason nganong naa tay prosti(today & probably forever) tungod na sa mga ginikanan nga mopugos sa ilang anak...bad parenting (reason number 1 pani)..Legalizing doesn't change anything, instead mas magduha-duha na hinoon ka kay makabayad kag tax nya mamonitor pajud ka sa gov't..

[cliff_drew]

Then I have already answered your question. This isn't a simple matter in which you can simply compare a prostitute with a factory worker. The government can impose special laws to prostitution. Do you honestly think P-noy would stand up in front of everyone and say "Hey guys! Prostitution is now legal so if you have daughters who are very much qualified, kindly force them to become one."

Go figure.

You missed the point bro. In the name of legality, how can the gov't impose such special laws? For it become a law, it has to have provisions/criterias/basis. What could be that? "Forcing" does not always not describe physically, ex. I could force my son to become doctor, police, soldier, etc. since I have the right to choose my son's career. No such law prohibits that unless there is a physical, emotional and psychological abuse.

[cliff_drew]

Add lang nako bai: there you have it, ang rason nganong naa tay prosti(today & probably forever) tungod na sa mga ginikanan nga mopugos sa ilang anak...bad parenting (reason number 1 pani)..Legalizing doesn't change anything, instead mas magduha-duha na hinoon ka kay makabayad kag tax nya mamonitor pajud ka sa gov't..

Assuming the gov't can handle everything

Bad parenting is not the primary reason of prostitution. Have your research bro.

[Eve's Apple Project]

You missed the point bro. In the name of legality, how can the gov't impose such special laws? For it become a law, it has to have provisions/criterias/basis. What could be that? "Forcing" does not always not describe physically, ex. I could force my son to become doctor, police, soldier, etc. No such law prohibits that unless there is a physical, emotional and psychological abuse.

to answer bai..dili man parehas ang prosti or doctor bai...those things nga imo gi mention is para sa kaayohan..di kadaotan..we all know nga dili maayo ang prosti taas kaayo ang health risk, etc..given na na.
wa juy balaod against parents forcing you to take your profession (labi na kay imo jud nang eskwelahan).
but if we are talking about prostitution, then lahi na bai..the gov't can always create a special law para ana...parehas gud anang "wang-wang"..special law man na...diba?

[TheInfidel]

You missed the point bro. In the name of legality, how can the gov't impose such special laws? For it become a law, it has to have provisions/criterias/basis. What could be that? "Forcing" does not always not describe physically, ex. I could force my son to become doctor, police, soldier, etc. No such law prohibits that unless there is a physical, emotional and psychological abuse.

I'm not missing the point bai, you just keep on generalising na all jobs are equal and that prostitution is pretty much the same as a being a doctor or a bus driver.

Again and again, that is why I keep on telling you that the government should impose special laws against forcing someone psychologically. Isn't this already part of the psychological abuse against women act?