heheheh.... censored sad mo gamay anang dili angay hisgutan like this Ma$%#%jane.. or pag sumbaggay nalang mo gud... hehehe
referree ko....
heheheh.... censored sad mo gamay anang dili angay hisgutan like this Ma$%#%jane.. or pag sumbaggay nalang mo gud... hehehe
referree ko....
hahahaha! Giving up under the pretense of me being a marijuana user, is like giving up because i smoke cigarettes.... hahahahah, there are so many ignorant people who still dont know the reason why marijuana is illegal, yet keep blabbering their mouths on its "DARK" side... hahahah, this cracks me up... Our beloved Rizal was even on weed while "not fighting for convicted kidnappers", hehehe on the topic of Rizal and other Revolutionaries, they were branded as traitors, and as such, did worse than me fighting for someone wrongfully accused... So, what should we do with them, JUSTICE BOY?
Hey, anything wrong with being BAYOT, BOY? Are you saying that you are against homosexuals? Coz I'm sure some homosexuals here would love to diddle with your back door after such a comment as that. Talk about PREJUDICE... now i know where your holier-than-thou approach is coming from... were you MOLESTED as a kid? ahhahahaha
OT: interesting debate
But very very OT already...Originally Posted by aimzweb
@ MANGO ... I myself can say that PACO is INNOCENT and I am not a JUDGE , a LAWYER nor a FRIEND of the Larranaga's , in fact gi birahan ko na si Paco sa una sa Don Bosco kadtong padong pa lang na mo kiat , gi tumban na nako ang ikog niya pero wala namo naputol ang sungay niya . Yes he is MALDITO , HAMBUGERO , PAUGAT , etc you name it but it does not justify na RAPIST siya .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Your proof that he is not a rapist?Originally Posted by SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
If I may point out also , we limit ourselves to the ISSUE of the CHIONG SISTERS who got RAPED and MURDERED . Who knows sayop diay ko naay lain na rape na si PACO but like I said , sa CHIONG'S ta mo focus .
My proof that he is not a RAPIST ?
- Mismo ang real suspects ni sulti sa wala pa sila nasikop kung kinsa silaha .
- Reliable people who can vouch for Paco himself that he is not in the vicinity of the crime when it happened .
We will say ngano diri man mo sa iSTORYA ni sulti ana ? Ngano di man sa SC or sa baranggay hall ni Kap ? Nahimo man gani ug suspect ug na konbiktohan ang usa ka langyaw na KWARTAHAN ug dako ang IMPLUWENSYA , ang mga ultimo na nakahibalo lang kaha sa tinuod ?
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
nga nong wla man cya sa vicinity kay didto cya sa manila?
this argument was raised in the supreme court.. and what did the supreme court say, it will take you only a couple of minutes to reach manila....
Wala siya sa Manila , didto siya ga SKWELA sa MANILA .Originally Posted by talsik
That is EXAGGERATED in the case if that what they really say . The scene of the crime " chances " are somewhere headed in the south w/c is about half and hour to 45 minutes drive towards mactan island where MIA is located . From MIA to NAIA is another 1 hour ... from NAIA to whereever Paco's location during the incident is another hour or 2 with traffic . SO is that a COUPLE of MINUTES ?this argument was raised in the supreme court.. and what did the supreme court say, it will take you only a couple of minutes to reach manila....
Read TOLSTOIS reply .... they have to nail PACO so they can NAIL the real suspects . If PACO is set free , all of them should be free also .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
OT: About respect for our justice system, I have personally lost my respect for it after we lost in a big land deal that was ours to start with. ...and guess what? we won in RTC & CA but only to lose in SC. They can always cite some sh!t up and justify it, after all THEY ARE THE LAW.
and do not always believe what you see or hear on TV or radio because most of the time they have their own version of the truth and I aslo experienced it first hand. it is more accurate to get testimonies from the people who are involved.
and for this particular thread, i got my stories from the people involved. in fact, I find Mrs. Chiong in denial but don't get me wrong, we personally know both families and I am not taking sides.
Similar Threads |
|