View Poll Results: Do you think the US is going to attack IRAN, and for what?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • WILL ATTACK for OIL

    5 55.56%
  • WILL ATTACK for WMD

    2 22.22%
  • WILL NOT ATTACK

    1 11.11%
  • UNSURE

    1 11.11%
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40
  1. #1

    Default Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?


    Ladies and Gents, since the US has already attacked Afghanistan and Iraq, do you think they will be moving to ATTACK IRAN?

    If you do, would it be for OIL or to stop the manufacturing of Weapons of Mass Destruction?

    I am very interested in your insights, as an attack on IRAN could trigger a much bigger conflict worldwide, and within the US itself...

    Remarks, clarifications, and comments encouraged... :mrgreen:

  2. #2

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    CERTAINLY FOR BLACK GOLD :mrgreen:

  3. #3

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?


    NO at this time maybe 3 years after pa ...ugma pa maayo connection ko cant reply much.


  4. #4

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    It is now obvious the invasion of Iraq had less to do with any threat from Saddam’s long-gone WMD program and certainly less to do to do with fighting International terrorism than it has to do with gaining strategic control over Iraq’s hydrocarbon reserves and in doing so maintain the U.S. dollar as the monopoly currency for the critical international oil market. Throughout 2004 information provided by former administration insiders revealed the Bush/Cheney administration entered into office with the intention of toppling Saddam Hussein.

    Candidly stated, ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’ was a war designed to install a pro-U.S. government in Iraq, establish multiple U.S military bases before the onset of global Peak Oil, and to reconvert Iraq back to petrodollars while hoping to thwart further OPEC momentum towards the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency (i.e. “petroeuro”). However, subsequent geopolitical events have exposed neoconservative strategy as fundamentally flawed, with Iran moving towards a petroeuro system for international oil trades, while Russia evaluates this option with the European Union.

    In 2003 the global community witnessed a combination of petrodollar warfare and oil depletion warfare. The majority of the world’s governments – especially the E.U., Russia and China – were not amused – and neither are the U.S. soldiers who are currently stationed inside a hostile Iraq. In 2002 I wrote an award-winning online essay that asserted Saddam Hussein sealed his fate when he announced in September 2000 that Iraq was no longer going to accept dollars for oil being sold under the UN’s Oil-for-Food program, and decided to switch to the euro as Iraq’s oil export currency.

    Indeed, my original pre-war hypothesis was validated in a Financial Times article dated June 5, 2003, which confirmed Iraqi oil sales returning to the international markets were once again denominated in U.S. dollars – not euros.

    The tender, for which bids are due by June 10, switches the transaction back to dollars -- the international currency of oil sales - despite the greenback's recent fall in value. Saddam Hussein in 2000 insisted Iraq's oil be sold for euros, a political move, but one that improved Iraq's recent earnings thanks to the rise in the value of the euro against the dollar.


    The Bush administration implemented this currency transition despite the adverse impact on profits from Iraqi’s export oil sales. (In mid-2003 the euro was valued approx. 13% higher than the dollar, and thus significantly impacted the ability of future oil proceeds to rebuild Iraq’s infrastructure). Not surprisingly, this detail has never been mentioned in the five U.S. major media conglomerates who control 90% of information flow in the U.S., but confirmation of this vital fact provides insight into one of the crucial – yet overlooked – rationales for 2003 the Iraq war.

    Concerning Iran, recent articles have revealed active Pentagon planning for operations against its suspected nuclear facilities. While the publicly stated reasons for any such overt action will be premised as a consequence of Iran's nuclear ambitions, there are again unspoken macroeconomic drivers underlying the second stage of petrodollar warfare – Iran's upcoming oil bourse. (The word bourse refers to a stock exchange for securities trading, and is derived from the French stock exchange in Paris, the Federation Internationale des Bourses de Valeurs.)

    In essence, Iran is about to commit a far greater “offense” than Saddam Hussein's conversion to the euro for Iraq’s oil exports in the fall of 2000. Beginning in March 2006, the Tehran government has plans to begin competing with New York's NYMEX and London's IPE with respect to international oil trades – using a euro-based international oil-trading mechanism.

    The proposed Iranian oil bourse signifies that without some sort of US intervention, the euro is going to establish a firm foothold in the international oil trade. Given U.S. debt levels and the stated neoconservative project of U.S. global domination, Tehran’s objective constitutes an obvious encroachment on dollar supremacy in the crucial international oil market.

    From the autumn of 2004 through August 2005, numerous leaks by concerned Pentagon employees have revealed that the neoconservatives in Washington are quietly – but actively – planning for a possible attack against Iran. In September 2004 Newsweek reported:

    "Deep in the Pentagon, admirals and generals are updating plans for possible U.S. military action in Syria and Iran. The Defense Department unit responsible for military planning for the two troublesome countries is “busier than ever,” an administration official says. Some Bush advisers characterize the work as merely an effort to revise routine plans the Pentagon maintains for all contingencies in light of the Iraq war. More skittish bureaucrats say the updates are accompanied by a revived campaign by administration conservatives and neocons for more hard-line U.S. policies toward the countries…"


    From http://www.energybulletin.net/7707.html with thanks to GWYNHEUVER...

  5. #5

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
    hmmm.. lemme see.... *gets calculator*
    oops.. floating point error. *gets a scientific calculator*

    they just might.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    Quote Originally Posted by cebutech
    http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
    hmmm.. lemme see.... *gets calculator*
    oops.. floating point error. *gets a scientific calculator*

    they just might.
    geez!
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    "The estimated population of the United States is 299,549,938
    so each citizen's share of this debt is $28,365.03.

    The National Debt has continued to increase an average of
    $1.58 billion per day since September 30, 2005!"


  7. #7

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    OMG..


    hopfuly george goes bankrupt b4 he takes iran...

  8. #8

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    will not attack... mahurot nang wawarts ni Dubya ana... kay kusgan na ang Iran karon and has probably acquired a lot of the necessary military hardware to defeat what Amerikan military has to offer...

  9. #9

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    hmmm, yeah, that's one thing they have to contend with... Iran has quite some heavy duty hardware plus heavyweight allies...

  10. #10

    Default Re: Will the USA attack IRAN? And for what?

    and them Iranians would probably play dirty too.. like hiding amongst civilians... when fighting...

  11.    Advertisement

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-21-2011, 03:51 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-31-2011, 08:27 PM
  3. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 11-14-2010, 06:32 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-23-2009, 03:29 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-06-2009, 11:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top