Is Philippines better off as a Communist country?!

[The_Child]

---

i second that motion.

[fingolfin]

.. ok, to those who say that Communism is the way to go, then kindly state your agenda. Give us details on how you will achieve order with communism. Convince us that it will work.

[Streetcar]

Its too late baby. Too late to change the course of time. Our great ancestors were never imparted with such to begin with. Communism has never been approached nor applied. Can't change the constitution. If they do, it means a total overhaul and how they do that i have no idea.

[hala tindak jud]

.. ok, to those who say that Communism is the way to go, then kindly state your agenda. Give us details on how you will achieve order with communism. Convince us that it will work.

Actually bai, di ni "PYRAMID" ang Communism, usa kini ka estado hain gipakita ni Marx nga wala nay hut-ong(CLASSLESS SOCIETY) ang katilingban. Kung morefer gani ta og kay lagi d jud ni posible ug walay equality nga mahitabu kay naay tapulan og adunay buotan and so on and so forth. That is an accepted fact no matter what. And on Communism issue that was not the matter.

And bai fingolfin, di man jud ko Political Scientist bai ha pero masabtan ra nimo ngano nakasuwat si Karl Marx (KM) sa Das Capital once imong hutdon ug basa, if you really wanted to be convinced bai, I am not the person who are capable of convincing you, it is yourself to find out the truth o bisan ang pagsabot sa theory sa Communism.

Ang usa ka punto ni Marx bai, FREE THE PEOPLE FROM OPPRESION, TYRANNY AND THE CHAINS OF SLAVERY. Mao ra na bai, usa ni sa "agenda" sa Komunismo, if bati ni siya, then maybe naay deperensya sa atong pagsabut sa usa'g usa.

[ganggreen]

patay na paniniwala na ang komunismo.. giba na ang berlin wall ang makapangyarihang union soviet ay nahati na at china ay yumakap na sa kapitalismo..ang prolema natin ay ang mga politiko na walang malinaw na programa para maiangat ang marami sa atin sa kahirapan.. sa buong term nila wala nang ginawa kundi mamulitika manira ng kapwa politiko mag rally at magpayaman..

[Dayuhan]

Its embarrasing when people hallucinate over Communism as the solution to our problem. Look around and see what Communist government has done to other countries and how so many people died in Russia alone under secrecy, in Vietnam, North Korea, in China, because of this twisted idealogy.

What makes you think that these leaders we have now can implement the visions of Utopia?

[hala tindak jud]

Wala pa jud nasud nga nakakab-ot og Komunismo mga amigo/a. Kung kabalo mo kung unsa ang estado sa Komunismo, then basin basaha balik ang inyong posts kay basin naay nasayop nga mga importanteng mga argumento.

Utopia? Who is dreaming of Utopia? That may happen hundred years from, but so far the best thing we do as an individual is to help our country. Wala man ta nangambisyon sa Utopia, pero nindut hunahuna-on, apan praktikal man ta, ganahan man ta mabuhi, then molihok ta. Pero out of the rail naman ta, ang ako lang ang Komunismo, sukad sukad wala pa natugkad.

Again, usa ka factor o ingredient sa komunismo kay, walay hut-ong, kung sa mga nasud nga nasulong sa Komunismo ug sa tan-aw ninyo wala nay hut-ong sukad ilang gideklara nila ilang kaugalinogn nga usa ka Komunista nga nasud, then they are wrong.

Lenin declared USSR (Union of Soviet [b["SOCIALIST"[/b] Republic)
Mao declared China as (People's Republic of China)
Castro declared Cuba as Cuba
Ho Chi Minh also named Viet Nam as People's Republic of Viet Nam
Kim Sung Il I named NoKor as People's Domcratic Republic of Korea

So asa man nila ni ngalan nga usa na sila ka Komunista nga nasud? I can not figure out, and of they were naming their country like that they shd be ashamed...In regards to the Internationale, if 3/4 of the whole population around the globe are already SOcialist, then a Communist country will exist.

[franklin]

ask lang ko bai ha, franklin bai. asa man diay dapita ang imposible ani bai? just asking to clear upo things bah. kay nag tuyok tuyok na ang istorya. ...At first look....so you are subjective to the topic, kay looking ra man ka... pero in reality imposible diay how can you conclude kay base sa imong statement you are only looking, not digging on the topic, so ask lang ko, asa ang imposible sa subject bai. kay false statement man gud ta ani. kay sa kung scientist pa ta, butboton ta kay wala man ta klaro nga observation, nya ni conclude naman dayon ta.

bitaw, i do really sound so very daghan alam, but in fact wala jud ko alam, mao nga ni ask ko sa imong supporting facts.

aku mahatag ani nga proof nga impossible ni bro kanang mga countries nga nagtry ani nga ideology. they changed many things about that ideology or never followed everything with it. its just too idealistic nga iyang gi disregard ang true nature of man nga naay freewill and intellect and is subject to corruption and temptation. apil pud ni sa nature sa humans nga they tend to compete sa iyang fellow humans which is part of survival thats making a classless society impossible. imo, this ideology is applicable only to animals or irrational beings who's relying only with their instincts

[hala tindak jud]

basin sad, i respect your opinion, so then wa tay lalis ani. basta ako sang opinion nga ang tawo dili usa ka mananap, naa siyay kapasidad nga mukat-on, mosabut, mo-usab sa batasan og ingon man sa mga hiwi nga dalan sa iyang kapaingnan, kung kutob ra ta sa freewill and human = animals then we will not grow. na abot na nato hapit ang uyokan sa science ni improve, nag invent,nag innovate ang tawo, if freewill lang ang atong basehanan ani og instinct, kapyot kapyot pa ta kahoy karon. if competition kay tungod survival of the fittest man kaha, naa ko lain nahuna hunaan, what if we must help others who needed help para kita tanan mabuhi, is that a survival of the fittest? a competition? an instinct? a freewill? or humanitarian thing?

In my own opinion..actually wako kasabot sa "IMO" hangtud nangutana ko ko saakongtupad...IMOHO...

[brian_d]

Socialist state siguro