Supreme Court acquits Webb, et al

[masakiton]

---

ummm... syop na application of law...

unsa man ila basehan kung na sayop ug apply ang law?

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

unsa man ila basehan kung na sayop ug apply ang law?

ang construction sa law ug ang fact na gi presentb sa lower ourt.. when i say facts kanang material facts na

when the lower court says that a doc is inadmissble as evidence then for the SC to admit it the sc should point a particular law which should have been considered by the lower court to accept it as evidence..

[masakiton]

ang construction sa law ug ang fact na gi presentb sa lower ourt.. when i say facts kanang material facts na

unsa manang material facts imo gi pasabot?
dili na mao ang documents/evidence/testimonies nga gi present sa both parties sa lower courts?

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

unsa manang material facts imo gi pasabot?
dili na mao ang documents/evidence/testimonies nga gi present sa both parties sa lower courts?

when the lower court says that a doc is inadmissble as evidence then for the SC to admit it the sc should point a particular law which should have been considered by the lower court to accept it as evidence..

[masakiton]

when the lower court says that a doc is inadmissble as evidence then for the SC to admit it the sc should point a particular law which should have been considered by the lower court to accept it as evidence..

ang SC lagi mo check kung na subay ba sa balaod pag dawat/reject sa mga documents/proof/facts/evidence/testimonies

[reypel]

OT
@masakiton: its by time you ask questions. so that you'll be enlightened rather than posting same posts that are not just irritating but its already annoying as well.

Ont: are they now making investigation as to who really the suspects are?

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

ang SC lagi mo check kung na subay ba sa balaod pag dawat/reject sa mga documents/proof/facts/evidence/testimonies

not all facts and not all evidence ang ila check kato ra mga gidawat ug mga gi apelahan sa pikas na naa baload na basehan na dapat gidwat..

[masakiton]

not all facts and not all evidence ang ila check kato ra mga gidawat ug mga gi apelahan sa pikas na naa baload na basehan na dapat gidwat..

not all.. means.. mo gamit gihapon sila sa fact and evidence? diba after nila ug check kung nag subay ba sa balaod ang pag dawat/reject sa fact and evidence .. diba ilaha man tan awon ang fact and evidence nga na dawat(kai ni sunod sa balaod) before sila mo himo ug verdict(guilty/acquit)?

[I-lab-Iero]

Is the decision of the SC is final and executory?,
or still the Visconde's can still make an appeal.

[masakiton]

Is the decision of the SC is final and executory?,
or still the Visconde's can still make an appeal.

naa pa daw mga 6months ang presecution