naa ko question sir? tsismis rpud nga drug addict si hubert webb? or ni admit jud xa? hehe bsi ako rpud nagsulti dri bah nga adis2x si hubert nag taka2x lng ko ug yawit.. mao rman pud gud akong nadunggan sa news...
nyways, naa ko question bah? g.desisyonan ba ni nga case base on techinicality?
As a rule: It is better to set free a dozen guilty,..than to jail an innocent... Our courts would always base their decision on the evidences presented...For me,..our court just did what it had to do or what they can do...Our judicial system at its basic believes that a person my be guilty beyond reasonable doubt...When the evidences were lost,..there was a difficult challenge in proving the accused's guilt...No technicalities involved,..it was purely basic rules in the judicial system...
I just pray that justice may still be served in the future...
kita ko sa interbyo sa mga free boys ba.
ngano man ni ilang mga mata oi? mga siga lagi kaayo unya kusog mokipat-kipat.
OT
pressured man gud tingali ang NBI sa una sa panahon ni Pres. Ramos
karon asa naman ni nagtago si jessica alfaro?? now she is being hunted right now...
i am not siding on the free boys or the victims, but ang ako lang is unsa jud ang sakto nga judgement sa balaod... the lower court was just an EPIC FAIL...
para pod nako, dapat jud dakpon na si jessica alfaro as soonest as possible... dapat manubag siya nilang hubert webb and 5 others wrongfully accussed... dili lalim mapriso kag 15 years nga lig-on ang mga ebidensiya sa mga convicts...
webb et al were acquitted not because they were INNOCENT! they were set free because of a technicality in the handling of the evidence. they are in fact guilty based of those evidences. technicality matters.
pero kung wala kaha to gipang-sunog ni biong ang mga ebidensya sa una, na unsa na kaha ni?
Similar Threads |
|