Supreme Court acquits Webb, et al

[AnInO]

---

@Black_mamba... I agree with you, That God above is the ultimate Justice. All of our arguments and opinions are futile, Because the "Prince Court" the Den of the wicked, Greedy and corrupted Jury's HAVE SPOKEN.

It is clear that they fabricated and manipulated the evidence just to clean the defendants side. OK ra man unta kung dili mag DRUGS...

nya pedi sad ko moingon brad na...

it is clear that they fabricated and manipulated the witness/testimony of Alfaro just to accuse the defendants side... ok ra man unta kung dli mag drugs.. unsaon taman drug adik man sad to c alfaro...

[masakiton]

G.R. No. 176389

3. The quality of the testimony

There is another thing about a lying witness: her story lacks sense or suffers from inherent inconsistencies. An understanding of the nature of things and the common behavior of people will help expose a lie. And it has an abundant presence in this case.

[black_mamba]

what if inosente si hubert webb?

sayon rjud nato e judge si hubert cause he was a drug dependent, meaning he has the tendency to do such crime...

pero wla nman gud ebidensya.... NASUNOG or GISUNOG...

and jessica alparo's testimony shows a lot of inconsistency... so which is which?

[pepponeskie]

what if inosente si hubert webb?

sayon rjud nato e judge si hubert cause he was a drug dependent, meaning he has the tendency to do such crime...

pero wla nman gud ebidensya.... NASUNOG or GISUNOG...

and jessica alparo's testimony shows a lot of inconsistency... so which is which?

they relied on the evidences (manufactured or not)...its like "to see, is to believe"

[black_mamba]

they relied on the evidences (manufactured or not)...its like "to see, is to believe"

what if kaw maoy ghimong suspek sa case? are you willing to waste 15 years of your life in jail?

[pepponeskie]

what if kaw maoy ghimong suspek sa case? are you willing to waste 15 years of your life in jail?

di ko oi...mapuno nako ug patik ana...if this is the case i can claim a double jeopardy.

[AnInO]

what if kaw maoy ghimong suspek sa case? are you willing to waste 15 years of your life in jail?

parehas ra gud na anang na priso ka g deny imong bail... maka gawas ka?

karon ra man gud na na dawat ilang appeal...

and they were building their defense... while the prosecution is slacking...

[FranZeno]

Excerpt lng where the Judge Tolentino went wrong sa una:

The defense produced more than 400 documents and presented 95 witnesses, including Hubert Webb himself and his father, along with other relatives and friends to support Webb’s alibi that he was in the United States from March 9, 1991, to October 26, 1992. On October 1, 1996, Judge Amelita Tolentino admitted only 10 of the 142 pieces of evidence the defense presented. Among evidence that was not admitted by Judge Tolentino, was the note verbale from the United States Embassy claiming that Webb was in the United States at the time of the massacre. This coincided with his passport and Philippine Immigration records but were dismissed by Tolentino's court, due to belief that these documents can possibly be falsified. Tolentino stated that she would accept this evidence only if then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright would testify as to the veracity of the note verbale's contents. Moreover, Judge Tolentino also denied Webb's request to subject semen samples to DNA testing on the belief that the samples may no longer be intact. The accused alleged that by rejecting 132 of the 142 pieces of evidence, Tolentino had set the tone for their conviction. On July 24, 1997, the Supreme Court noted that Tolentino erred when she refused to admit the 132 pieces of evidence presented by the defense, although these were later admitted in court through an order issued by Tolentino.

GR No. 127262

Webb's petition to request for the Testimony by Oral Deposition of US Govt Officials and citizens:

G.R. No. 132577

[black_mamba]

parehas ra gud na anang na priso ka g deny imong bail... maka gawas ka?

karon ra man gud na na dawat ilang appeal...

and they were building their defense... while the prosecution is slacking...

mao btaw lisud jd e prove if wlay DIRECT EVIDENCE... may ta to if CONSISTENT ang mga statement sa star witness ( Jessica Alparao )

ang nka swerte lng ni webb is gkan siya sa may kaya nga pamilya atleast d kaayo siya ka feel unsa jud ka empyerno ang prisohan..

[AnInO]

mao btaw lisud jd e prove if wlay DIRECT EVIDENCE... may ta to if CONSISTENT ang mga statement sa star witness ( Jessica Alparao )

ang nka swerte lng ni webb is gkan siya sa may kaya nga pamilya atleast d kaayo siya ka feel unsa jud ka empyerno ang prisohan..

mas mo base man gud ta dri sa pinas sa tsimis evidence kaysa material evidence...