ang SC gi basehan ila decission sa facts
dili mag pa dala sa gi bati ... kung tan aw ninyo sayop decission sa SC... pakita pud mo facts to prove that they are wrong
Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.
^ the Supreme Court is not a trier of facts, so I don't know what the hell you're blabbing about. The fool is the idiot who thinks our justice system is working.
wheres the justicesi hayden kho pod wa nay problem..kapit man ni tanan ni noy oi....tsk..................
To all the Supreme Court supporters, explain to me how the Supreme Court can violate its own rules and not be called a hypocritical, Jester Court of Asia.
"Asked why the high court, not a trier of facts, overturned the factual findings of the lower courts, Marquez said: “The findings of the lower courts are given great weight but the SC can also look at the testimonies and other pieces of evidence.” In this particular case, the majority noted that the testimonies of witnesses, in particular former NBI agent and confessed drug addict Jessica Alfaro, were replete with inconsistencies."
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/12...%99-law-school
Once again the Supreme Court makes leeway for itself to violate its own Constitutional limits. It is not a trier of facts, only of law. But the Court made exception in this case. That's the problem with Philippine justice, palusot lang pirmi, asta ang highest court in the land. Our asian neighbors are absolutely correct in considering our justice system one of the worst in the region ranked down there with Indonesia.
So the very fact that decisions are promulgated nevermind if they make no sense or are completely illogical means that the justice system is working? That's the dumbest thing I've read ever... Or how about the fact that a decision is rendered 15 years after the case was filed? Still working? Hahaha.. funny! You belong in the Philippine Supreme Court, with that amazing logic.
Similar Threads |
|