I replied on your post with no ill will..what's wrong with pointing out facts?..that you will sometimes refer to past situations of Marcos and Erap. IS IT MOCKERY NOW?Originally Posted by FK
I replied on your post with no ill will..what's wrong with pointing out facts?..that you will sometimes refer to past situations of Marcos and Erap. IS IT MOCKERY NOW?Originally Posted by FK
then let fingolfin or any mods do the moderating of my post and not just anybody else!what's wrong with hahahas after a reply? ask fingolfin? he has just warned a user for using those hahahaha...
hilasa pud ani bai..how dare you say that!..aren't we all have different styles of postingone last OT mods:
if that's how you understand my previous posts "as hilas" then so be it. that's your opinion, I won't make this discussion any more heated and as OT as it should be.. I've said my part, you've heard it, it's the end of the story. it's enough and it's up to the mods if it's necessary or not to make changes on P&CE with regards to unecessary "side comments" including those types of smiley's and "hahaha", "hehehe" lolz and the like specially in discussions where proponents are in a good, intelligent and interesting discussion.
LET'S ENTRUST THE MODERATING TO THE MODS AND ADMIN WHOM IT SEEMS FITTING! IF THERE IS ANYONE WHO WILL ADDRESS ME WITH THESE KIND OF WORDS, IT SHOULD ONLY BE THEM, ELSE YOU ARE ONLY GETTING PERSONAL.
go get a life!
tolstoi: FYI, I've always entrusted the moderating to the mods and admins eversince, even if I'm just basically "newbie" compared to y'all. besides, my first intentions to join here was to sell some stuffs at the BS Section. and to reiterate my point since I've joined this forum last year, "I don't have any intentions in being a mod" and you can take that to the bank. but I think, we, as "older members" of this community should set higher standards for ourselves. higher than what the rules of iSTORYA asks of us, that is, if y'all including FK, istoryador, me and the rest would agree however different our convictions and ideas may be. it doesn't need for "us" to be mods to make this forum a better community than what it is right now. do we have to be mods to promote respect among fellow members? what's wrong with that? that's for the betterment of the community and not for my own selfish gain.
but now, I'm branded as a "mod wannabe" if I make a comment against your posts.. branded as such if I point out something to make this forum get to the next level.. tsk tsk..
just an example, I've met with FK head-on countless of times on most of the topics here and even if that's the case we never resorted to insults or mocking.. I am guilty of it (mocking) by the way but if I get a post from a fellow member pointing to it, I'll consider it as a constructive critiscm and not the other way around. but if that's how you view my actions, then there's nothing else I can do 'bout it...
and if you think my post is "hilas" then that's for everyone else who visits this thread to decide...
Shut Up! Let your GAME do the talking!
I replied on your post with no ill will..what's wrong with pointing out facts?..that you will sometimes refer to past situations of Marcos and Erap. IS IT MOCKERY NOW?
..just re read post nos. 156 and 157 and maybe it'll help refresh your memory..
Shut Up! Let your GAME do the talking!
mods, since this issue has been settled because the second impeachment was quashed, please don't delete this thread. a lock would suffice so we could have this as a basis for future discussions.
Shut Up! Let your GAME do the talking!
awwss..how bad it can be to express oneself thru smileys, hahahah, lolz, bweheheh?..did i really cause the downfall of this forum's standard into an infinitesimal level? we all have different personalities bai in expressing oneself/ideas, and I'm FREE to express it for as long as i'm conforming with the rules of this forum!..other than the MODS here, i don't need a nagger like you to dictate how my antics in posting should be like!!but I think, we, as "older members" of this community should set higher standards for ourselves. higher than what the rules of iSTORYA asks of us, that is, if y'all including FK, istoryador, me and the rest would agree however different our convictions and ideas may be. it doesn't need for "us" to be mods to make this forum a better community than what it is right now.
and here's my reply to that post.Originally Posted by omad
Originally Posted by tolstoi
how about you stop being a nagger and just rely on MODS wisdom on what should be done on this topic!Originally Posted by omad
O.T.
dako na ka bai... og i hope ni mature sab ang imong utok. you can make all excuses or what. it's tiresome and futile nga makig istorya nimo og tarong og may respeto. bisan pa og para nako bolay-og ang 2bag sa uban poster...I replied on your post with no ill will..what's wrong with pointing out facts?..that you will sometimes refer to past situations of Marcos and Erap. IS IT MOCKERY NOW?
as the desiderata says...
i'd rather shut-up...Go placidly amid the noise and haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible without surrender
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly;
and listen to others,
even the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story.
dili nalang ko mo patul ani na comments bai kai for sure Warning or Ban ato padulngan kung padak-on pa nato..wala gyud ko intention na makiglalis nimo, i've replied on all your posts in a lightly manner.Originally Posted by FK
last nalang gyud ni MODS..sorry kaayu sa mga OTs
@ Omad: errr, forgive me for butting in, but why is your message icon grinning? If people are to follow your suggestion that smileys be relegated to the humor section, why the grin...? Does this mean that we should take what you say with a grain of salt?
Similar Threads |
|