Apollo 11 Ultra Slow Motion 16mm HD launch

[rkudoz]

---

you could be thinking that the camera used here was of commercial grade, in which case was very unlikely. take note that NASA at this time had billions of $ at their disposal to advance cutting edge technology. they developed a camera/photography system which serve their purpose well but were not commercially viable at that time, either because there was no market or the production cost was way too high.
as we all know that the technology of that era has now become obsolete.

well i was referring to the technical capabilities of the camera if you would think so, ni admire lang sab bya ko.... no need to be so vague about ana hehehe... in the first place, we didnt have that technology ourself...daghan namatay bya sa mga expeditions to the space using nasa's tech...

they had billions, yes, but they never had a clear glimpse of space when the vessels were already outside the earth's atmosphere, not until recently...

but you have a point, since those tech weren't commercialized...

btw, there are some comments in youtube, by some videography expert... which i found very interesting...

[ingkiang]

nice share...

[cromagnon]

gahi jud to nga glass ang nag cover sa camera... high temp tolerance

[darkgravedic]

wow..cool!!!

[Visual C#]

Moon landing video in HD? Clearly a proof that it was all staged in a desert in Nevada! Moon landing was a hoax, I tell you..






.. </sarcasm>

[phil8s]

amazing, this is what we can get with an HD camera, and this one was made years ago..how about with the current one they're using?

[Crimson_Viper]

o.k, about your camera.camera reactions.. i word, AMERICAAAAAAAAA.!