Ombudsman vs President

[brandnewbien]

---

hahaha nyc one HOMER! failed w/ the wisdom

idol kaau nko si homer. murag si noynoy. yellow pud

[cebulifer]

I disagree, Right to Suffrage is one of the most important Rights we have.

i disagreed with him also. but his reasoning was, the masses have been selling their votes and putting in power politicos that are not qualified for the position.

when i disagreed to his suggestion, he then countered... ok, pro-rated na lang. people how don't file income taxes gets one vote. people who file income taxes, their votes count as 3.

i gave him another bottle of san mig light and talked with other things afterwards. hahaha!

[Androx]

wish naa maka explain ani further why this is the way how they standardize this qualifications for presidency....

[gareb]

a President is not just an administrator, but a visionary, as well as a figurehead and a symbol for his country. he cannot function alone. he needs subordinate administrators, advisers and consultants so he can formulate the best possible agenda that suits his vision of the country. vision is not limited to, nor should be it be exclusive for those who have formal academic degrees, though these help. the leadership of an administrator who does not have a vision is stagnant. the leadership of a visionary who does not have any means to realize his dream is futile.

an Ombudsman is an administrator with a special function, and that is to investigate alleged wrongdoings by government officials. as such, there is a most definite need for this official to have exemplary standing among his/her peers in the judiciary. simply stated, if your specific business is prosecuting criminals, at least you should know law and be good at it.

we also need to remember how these officials can take their positions; one is appointed (as with all appointees for other positions), supposedly for his/her technical knowledge and skill in the area concerned. the other is elected for the same, as well as various other reasons.

i do not see any point is comparing the appointment of an ombudsman to the election of a president, just like we should not be comparing a doctor practicing medicine, or a meteorologist working at PAGASA at being elected for barangay chairman.

[haroldking]

a President is not just an administrator, but a visionary, as well as a figurehead and a symbol for his country. he cannot function alone. he needs subordinate administrators, advisers and consultants so he can formulate the best possible agenda that suites his vision of the country. vision is not limited to, nor should be it be exclusive for those who have formal academic degrees, though these help. the leadership of an administrator who does not have a vision is stagnant. the leadership of a visionary who does not have any means to realize his dream is futile.

an Ombudsman is an administrator with a special function, and that is to investigate alleged wrongdoings by government officials. as such, there is a most definite need for this official to have exemplary standing among his/her peers in the judiciary. simply stated, if your specific business is prosecuting criminals, at least you should know law and be good at it.

we also need to remember how these officials can take their positions; one is appointed (as with all appointees for other positions), supposedly for his/her technical knowledge and skill in the area concerned. the other is elected for the same, as well as various other reasons.

i do not see any point is comparing the appointment of an ombudsman to the election of a president, just like we should not be comparing a doctor practicing medicine, or a meteorologist working at PAGASA to the election of a barangay chairman.

a big slap of my face! ayay! kudos to you gareb!

[cebulifer]

pakpak para kay gareb! hehehe!

Didn't see the visionary part. Sakto ka! leadership and the will to make the hard choices.

[Dark-Knight]

Well said Gareb!!! Clear enough para masabtan ang issue sa ombudsman vs president.

[sizzlingROBOT]

Blame it to our constitution and those who opposes to amend it.

Q: why there are soo many requirements in becoming into an ombudsman like must have a Professional law degrees and etc... while our president only must know how to read and write... paetzzz!

-----------------------

naglibog lng jud kow why in ani ato system

[estor_boot]

Q: why there are soo many requirements in becoming into an ombudsman like must have a Professional law degrees and etc... while our president only must know how to read and write... paetzzz!

-----------------------

naglibog lng jud kow why in ani ato system

if you know what are the functions of a president and an ombudsman, you wouldn't ask your silly question. or maybe you are thinking that lawyers are the smartest people on earth?

it's like saying the lawyers from the legal department of Androx International Corporation are more deserving to be the president of the company than the company founder himself, Mr. Androx. get the drift?

[Androx]

@ estoor tnx sa opnion bro... nag wonder lng kow ba kai the president man gud is the leader he must be an ideal president the one to look up too... w/ regards sa pa brightanay i know dli lng lawyers ang bright (ako diay di man kow lawyer) ahahaha joke2x.. academic wise bogo kow hagbung english 2.hahahaha but lahi man jud if u achieve a certain level dba? wats the use of masterals and doctorate? diba to enhance ur status and dli bya ni xa madali2x og kuha nimo kelangan bya jud og studies and experience para mo graduate ka ani... ang umbudsman gud grabe man jud xa qualifications w/c is good but the president the one who leads mas maayo man jud para nakow nga dli lng bisag kinsa ang mo dagan.... ang president gud siya man gud makig atubang sa uban leaders of other nations mas maayo jud if knowledgable not just a revisionist... thats my point of view... but any opinions welcome jud diri e post... mas maayo daghan knowledge ma gather..hehehehe