Shroud of Turin Exposed

[FAQ]

---

If Cinderella is a fake story, then why is there a 3D castle of hers in Disney World?

Oh, that's right... because people created it after the story had already been written and circulated. Get the logic?

[redhorse1L]

If Cinderella is a fake story, then why is there a 3D castle of hers in Disney World?

Oh, that's right... because people created it after the story had already been written and circulated. Get the logic?

Inexplicable 3D Optical Illusion Phenomenon

The generated 3D model image produced came from the precise copy of the shroud.

As the page said: You can not plot a regular photograph this way. Nor can you do so for a painting, even a brown and white painting.

[FAQ]

That shroud is a bunch of hype and science has basically proven that is NOT from the time of Jesus, but rather hundreds of years later. Sorry.

Bro, the shroud was proven a fake a LONG time ago. Duh. It's become one of those cases where the wishful thinkers just don't want to let it go, so they're going to pretend that it wasn't proven a fake.

[rr_sipat]

Just believe in GOD, even if still i cant see him!

[redhorse1L]

That shroud is a bunch of hype and science has basically proven that is NOT from the time of Jesus, but rather hundreds of years later. Sorry.

Bro, the shroud was proven a fake a LONG time ago. Duh. It's become one of those cases where the wishful thinkers just don't want to let it go, so they're going to pretend that it wasn't proven a fake.

proven to be fake a LONG time ago? --> What's your basis?
As per my previous posts, the Carbon dating was questionable.

But focusing on how the image was produced, it is still a mystery.
The only plausible cause is that it was imprinted from a blood stain of a dead man.

[FAQ]

In 1988, scientists carried out carbon-14 dating of the delicate linen cloth and concluded that the material was made some time between 1260 and 1390. Their study prompted the then archbishop of Turin, where the Shroud is stored, to admit that the garment was a hoax.

Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake

I've known the Shroud of Turin was fake for decades. It's just a fake Relic created to legitimize a church, which was very common in those days (every new church had to have a relic).

I don't think the Shroud of Turin is the real deal. Doesn't matter anyway. If you are Catholic/christian, it shouldn't be revered or worshiped. If it was in my possession, I'd throw it away.

[heptics]

hoax maybe , true maybe...

[necrotic freak]

I've known the Shroud of Turin was fake for decades. It's just a fake Relic created to legitimize a church, which was very common in those days (every new church had to have a relic).

I don't think the Shroud of Turin is the real deal. Doesn't matter anyway. If you are Catholic/christian, it shouldn't be revered or worshiped. If it was in my possession, I'd throw it away.

Will you really throw it away? or make some money out of it.

[devilsburger]

Shroud of Turin displayed again

Sat Apr 10, 7:25 PM

WINNIPEG (CBC) - The Shroud of Turin, believed by many Christians to be the burial cloth of Jesus Christ, went on public display Saturday for the first time in a decade at a cathedral in northern Italy.

Over the next six weeks, about two million people are expected to view the linen bearing the faded image of a bearded man.
Each visitor will be allowed five minutes to stand before the bulletproof, climate-controlled case containing the cloth inside northern Italy's Turin Cathedral, where it has been kept for 500 years. In that time, the public has been allowed to view it on only five occasions. The last time was in 2000.
The shroud was discovered in the French city of Troyes in the mid-14th century. It underwent a major cleaning and restoration in 2002.
Restorers removed 30 patches sewn on by nuns in 1534, two years after the cloth was damaged in a fire.
Bruno Barberis, head of the international centre on the shroud, said no one has yet been able to explain how the image on the cloth was formed.
"We are practically sure that it is the image left by a human corpse, not a painting or an image obtained in some other human way," he said.
Carbon dating in 1988 claimed the image of the man could not be that of Jesus because the shroud was medieval. But many have rejected that result and want further scientific tests to be carried out.
Pope Benedict XVI will visit Turin on May 2 to pray before the 4.3-metre-long, one-metre-wide shroud.

[redhorse1L]

"We are practically sure that it is the image left by a human corpse, not a painting or an image obtained in some other human way," he said.
Carbon dating in 1988 claimed the image of the man could not be that of Jesus because the shroud was medieval. But many have rejected that result and want further scientific tests to be carried out.

Nice.. that's why we are still exchanging ideas here, since its not yet conclusive.

Skeptics says that its a hoax since Carbon dating says so.

Believer says that the image made is indeed left by a human corpse, with blood stains, and pollens that are found only in Jerusalem, Carbon dating results might be incorrect.


Let's wait for further development..