Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[kenites]

---

Kinsa ako gi touhan asa ta gikan?
Bible jud, word of God gud nah
Praise the Lord!

Checkmate na mo mga Atheist!, coz the Bible said so!

[cromagnon]

dli oi gikan ta sa ongoy , kay daghan ongoy ug nawng ah

[bungot25]

Thanks for the laugh. I won't do you any favors by giving you answers that take time and effort to compose but then you won't/choose not to understand.

i wont understand its pretty obvious! you cant seem to produce any of those facts that proves evolution is valid! you cant even defend dawkins theory!!! hahaha...defense mode napod ni sa mga evolution believers,, wat a nutCase!! lolss

[baby.angel]

kataw.anana anang LOLzZz ug bungot oi.., kung makaila lng ang mga taw kng kinsa mo, uwawa kaha.., kataw.anan ug reasoning. ka.mabaw. kung ako na c schmuck, d nlng ko makiglalis. kapoi rason ug ensakto nia d ra hatagan ug effort para sabton bsag nindot unta ug punto.

hnuon, ug ako sd c LOLzZz ug bungot, d sd nko sabton ang gipang.ingon ni schmuck kai mkakita nia ko sa punto nga mas ka2ohan d.i na kaisa sa akong reasoning nga ug mawad.an ug explanation, ipasalig nlng sa pagsalig (nga wai pagduda bsag wa kahibaw ngano o unsa).

nindot bya ang gpangsulti sa bible.. as guidance para mkahimo ug maayo nga butang. kuwang lng giud ug sakto nga pagpasabot ngano.. mura tag bata nga mangutana "ngano diay blue ang sky?" .. tubagon lng ug "pagbuot mn na sa ginoo".. dli na i.explain bout absorption sa shorter wavelength light and etc.

ang nkanindot sa science, d magtinapulan ug pasabot nato ngano ingn ana ang mga butang.

mao dghan sa bible ang mamisinterpret kai wa natarong ug pasabot basta kai tuo lng mo.


on topic:
mas ka2ohan ang explanation sa science.

additional OffTopic:
paglingaw mo sa iniong kinabuhi oi basta d lng mo mangtamak ug laing taw. dli kai magbuhat ug nindot kai hadlok ma empyerno. naunsa.

[baby.angel]

i wont understand its pretty obvious! you cant seem to produce any of those facts that proves evolution is valid! you cant even defend dawkins theory!!! hahaha...defense mode napod ni sa mga evolution believers,, wat a nutCase!! lolss

the origin of Life is GOD...he is a super intelligent being that created the whole universe......

^proof nlng ana bungot beh. hsgot man pud kag facts para ma.prove nga valid ang evolution.

-------------------------

or basin mas mu.tuo ka kung muingn ko nga evolution giud coz feel lng nko. and i strongly believe in it. aiaw nlng pangutana ngano. or kung mangutana ka ngano, i.feel lng gud. mka.feel ra ka kung mutuo sd ka.. try lng.. (but the problem is, are you willing? people of your kind would decline) --- pareha sa reasoning ni LOLzZz, pareha man mog side.

how is this to be done? hmm EASY. Be a spiritual man. the problem is, are you willing? thats the question. you always ask for proofs but when people guide you towards the path that leads to God, most of your likes would decline.

ka.LOL

[LOLzZz]

Watch me shred every stupid argument to ribbons.

let's see.

SCIENCE PERSECUTED THOSE WHO SAY THAT THE SUN IS THE CENTER OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM?
Let me get that buzzer...beepbeep...WRONG ANSWER. THE VATICAN TRIED AND PERSECUTED GALILEO, DUMMY! OMG! I'm talking to an IDIOT!

WRONG ANSWER. haha. before the heliocentric model there was the theory of geocentric and it was the popular astronomy of that period. When Galileo finally solidified Copernicus heliocentric model, his fellow scientists opposed him strongly. tsk tsk! The Church's affiliation to geocentric astronomy propagated by the scientists of that time moved them to persecute Galileo.

You didnt know that? no? now the idiot pointer shifts to you. I thought your going to shed the argument into pieces. I think you just cut your finger.

WATCH HOW I'LL HIT TWO HEADLESS BIRDS WITH ONE STONE.

Darwin's Theory of Evolution doesn't claim that fishes will evolve into an amphibian or serpents into birds. The Theory also doesn't deal with CHEMICAL EVOLUTION.

I THOUGHT THE GUY'S READ THE BOOKS ABOUT EVOLUTION, LET ALONE UNDERSTOOD THEM. HE'S JUST SHOOTING OFF THE HIP LIKE SOME CRAZED LUNATIC.

hahaha, i heard this one many times over. okay i think you didnt get the point, so from X to Y, tell me how did X became Y ? lets see your explanation but be very careful I know where to hit you. Your logical fallacies: appealing to popularity, appealing to authority are just examples of your own ignorance in debates.

by the way you didnt hit any bird at all. Assumptions are powerless, you offer no defense you just assumed.

THEORIES CHANGE. I've always said that. AGAIN, BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T KEEP UP WITH MY POSTS, YOU MISSED THIS EXPLANATION (But I'll paste it here again for everyone's perusal...it also contains Richard Feynman's famous chess analogy):



I hope the above analogy makes clear to everyone what a scientific theory is.

FROM HEREON IN, I'm going to continue with my Biblical Errancy posts. ONLY IN THE RELIGIONISTS' CIRCLES DO YOU FIND THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION STILL REJECTED...NOT IN THE MAINSTREAM SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. THE RELIGIOUS CRACKPOT HATES SCIENCE? THAT'S FINE BY ME. THE FEELING'S MUTUAL.

thank you for the effort but the chess analogy can't patch the hole, still the issue remains, theory changes, in other words what is true today can be a lie tomorrow. Remember the battle between the proponents of the geocentric and heliocentric model.

and again the NAS approval thing holds nothing. Theory changes. Yes Evolution is still no science and not a fact. okay prove to me Darwinian Evolution, that if you can.

[LOLzZz]

You honestly believe I don't understand those. Oh my FSM!

The FSM is more than that, it is meant to make you examine your own beliefs and the reasons why you believe them. But as the old saying goes, Irony is wasted on the stupid.

by the way you present your argument, yes you don't.

Irony is wasted on the stupid, that is so true, i have you in my mind.

He missed it? speak for yourself

Clear and precise? maybe something's wrong with me or with you coz it's blurred and imprecise..
Even if your bats and snakes cannot see me I still exist, why? coz I'm here, I'm tangible and testable and I'm even replying to you..
Is your God testable/tangible? you said yes to schmuck if we will turn into a spiritual man, and like what I've told you I've been there and sorry I found nothing. Now am I using this as an evidence of the god's non existent like what you think? that statement even hardly qualifies as an evidence.
Why should I be presenting evidence anyway, I'm not claiming something here..it's your duty to present us your evidence. Extraordinary claims requires an extraordinary proof. So please present your extraordinary proof.
I will ask you again, how can you be certain that your christian god is the right god? and not the god of islam or god of hindus?
If your god is omniscient and omnipotent, why can't he create a perfect world?
If your god is omnibenevolent, what has he been doing to the poor people?
and he even messed up his book, just check hitch's post.

yes maybe there is something wrog with you. You jumped in w/o first reading the discussion prior to your first post against my argument.

you've been there? nah...your effort was not enough judging from where you are now.

I did, I told you to scroll up, you might find something there that would tell you how to know God.

Islam claim that we have the same God, the only difference is in the rituals and traditions. You dont know that do you? haha, you see before you strut your argument to me be very sure that you have the right stuff.

Hindus would also tell you that the source of all their thousands of Gods and including the Christian God is One.

so who is the true God? you decide.

why can't he create a perfect world? you didnt read the book? the reason is all there.

what has he been doing to the poor? are you blaming God for the plight of the poor? haha. let me tell you a story, I have heard a lot of stories of poor people whose needs were met by God because of their faith in Him.

He messed up his book? ow hictch's bible study? haha, its has poor hermeneutics. the exegesis are terrible. hahaha! oh but you wouldnt know that.

[randymunz]

there is such thing as false belief. it's called "faith".

"faith" is believing even the unseen, so to say that you have brain is therefore of faith coz even though you have'nt seen your brain, but yet you believe you have.

[INRI]

kataw.anana anang LOLzZz ug bungot oi.., kung makaila lng ang mga taw kng kinsa mo, uwawa kaha.., kataw.anan ug reasoning. ka.mabaw. kung ako na c schmuck, d nlng ko makiglalis. kapoi rason ug ensakto nia d ra hatagan ug effort para sabton bsag nindot unta ug punto.

hnuon, ug ako sd c LOLzZz ug bungot, d sd nko sabton ang gipang.ingon ni schmuck kai mkakita nia ko sa punto nga mas ka2ohan d.i na kaisa sa akong reasoning nga ug mawad.an ug explanation, ipasalig nlng sa pagsalig (nga wai pagduda bsag wa kahibaw ngano o unsa).

nindot bya ang gpangsulti sa bible.. as guidance para mkahimo ug maayo nga butang. kuwang lng giud ug sakto nga pagpasabot ngano.. mura tag bata nga mangutana "ngano diay blue ang sky?" .. tubagon lng ug "pagbuot mn na sa ginoo".. dli na i.explain bout absorption sa shorter wavelength light and etc.

ang nkanindot sa science, d magtinapulan ug pasabot nato ngano ingn ana ang mga butang.

mao dghan sa bible ang mamisinterpret kai wa natarong ug pasabot basta kai tuo lng mo.


on topic:
mas ka2ohan ang explanation sa science.

additional OffTopic:
paglingaw mo sa iniong kinabuhi oi basta d lng mo mangtamak ug laing taw. dli kai magbuhat ug nindot kai hadlok ma empyerno. naunsa.

Exactly
Bulls eye sis!
Let's give them a big LolzZz again

[Mr. BrokenHearted]

para nako Bible jud ta gikan oiez... dghan man jud prove nga gikan ta sa Bible nga gihimo ta ni God....