Kinsa jud imo gituohan kung diin jud tah gikan, ang Bible or Science?

[necrotic freak]

---

and clearly your also in the process of being converted as evolutionist. its ok freaky girl, its our secret.

your the one who's calling me names, and im the one who is OT? im just giving back what your giving to me. what perfect girlalush mind you have. nyahahahahaha!

I’m not calling you names actually. just want to let you know that i did not evolve from a monkey like you do. And don’t ever force someone to believe in your theory. and claiming here that you have gain a convert? Pathetic ape!


Astig man diay ni ug kaliwat si orcgod sa?

[romano2717]

Sa di pa ta ma tagak sa pang-pang sa pg ka OT.
For the record, di lng kay Bible ra ang naay story of creation, different cultures around the world naa sd clay laeng version, like the The Boshongo Myth in Africa. Well, wala may labot ang Boshongo Myth sa choices ane na thread, pro ang ponto nko is laen2x ang taw og pag-buot unsay tuho-an nla depende sa
na andan.

If you believe by FAITH, a million scientific proof is never enough.
If you believe SCIENTIFICALLY, a million book of faith is never enough.

[hitch22]

Uwahi naman kaayo mo sa balita. 2009 ni nga article: The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity. Vatican na na ha.

Anybody who wants to falsify the basic framework of Darwin's Theory of Evolution must at least point out the specific claims/predictions that the theory makes. Otherwise, you're just showing total ignorance about the theory. Darwin's theory never stated that we came from monkeys. Darwin's theory doesn't say that monkey's will become humans one day. That's just revealing gross ignorance of the matter. Another thing is that mainstream scientists do not debate about the fact of evolution or Darwin's basic framework (i.e. origins of species arising from variation and random mutation subject to natural selection). The debate you see now centers more on how evolution occurred, like between the Neo-Darwinian school and those of the Gould/Lewontin camp. Pero wala nay nag argue nga dili tinuod ang evolution.

Read and understand first the Darwin's Theory, and then pick out one claim that it makes which you think is wrong and then we can have a serious discussion. A lot of people get so caught up about missing links in the fossil records and say that you have to complete the whole collection before you can prove the phenomenon of evolution. That's not the point of the fossil record. The fossil record actually shows you how accurate the theory has been. There's not one fossil that's uncovered that does not fit nicely into the evolutionary tree. If you can find just one fossil that does not belong to its rightful time period, then you can say that the theory is wrong. For example, if you can find the fossil of a rabbit in the Precambrian period, you'll have the scientific community scrambling for answers. As it stands, NONE exists to falsify the theory's claims. 100% ang batting average ni Darwin!

[WengIA]

nausab na akong huna2 ron..murag cgurado nako gikan tas liking kawayan.... hihihihi

[necrotic freak]

Evolution is true to animals. But it’s false on human.

[kenites]

@necrotic and orcgod---bai stop nalang inyo away murag personalan na kaayo mo dah
stick nalang ta sa topic


@hitch22 --- I'm glad that your back man

Read and understand first the Darwin's Theory, and then pick out one claim that it makes which you think is wrong and then we can have a serious discussion.

I think hitch here has a very good idea..para naa pud kapa ingnan ato discussion..kay cge nalang jud ta tuyok2x ani

[kenites]

Evolution is true to animals. But it’s false on human.

bai no offense ha...di ba bible believer man ka?

dili ba ni contradictory imo statement? bisan sa evolution of animals lang ka ni tuo.
since according to Bible animals and human was created by God in its present form..

paki explain lang pud bro para kasayod pud mi sa imo stand..

[necrotic freak]

bai no offense ha...di ba bible believer man ka?

dili ba ni contradictory imo statement? bisan sa evolution of animals lang ka ni tuo.
since according to Bible animals and human was created by God in its present form..

paki explain lang pud bro para kasayod pud mi sa imo stand..

yes bai im with the great intelligent design..

you are correct, animals and human were created by God in its present form.. But the difference is that animals were created with only Mind and Body, sige pani sila ug evolve until now.. where as we human in other hand was specially created with Mind, Body, and Spirit in real present form. Since then wala na ta ni evolve because we were created in the image and likeness of God. Mao na akong stand bai.

[necrotic freak]

@necrotic and orcgod---bai stop nalang inyo away murag personalan na kaayo mo dah
stick nalang ta sa topic

no probz bai..

[robert_papalid_ece]

Uwahi naman kaayo mo sa balita. 2009 ni nga article: The Vatican claims Darwin's theory of evolution is compatible with Christianity. Vatican na na ha.

sabat lang ko gamay mga bros ha? kay lingaw na man sa'g balik diri...
i would like to remind everybody that the Vatican is for Catholics. i am not a Catholic, so it doesn't matter if Vatican agrees with evolution... i could still even remember that Pope John Paul II (Vatican) said... that there's no such thing as "hell"... while in the Bible... pirme man tawn nang i-emphasize ang "hell" oi...

usahay man gud... or should i say... most of the time... conflict man sad ang mga teachings sa Vatican... dili consistent sa Bible bah... anyway... Bible vs Evolution man ang topic... not Vatican vs Evolution... and Vatican <> Bible...