Yes
No
Those anti-abortion crusaders really need to stop sitting at their computers and starting at the screen and go outside and look at the real world. Anybody who has seen a poor family with eight children will know that the issue is a lack of education. Nobody wants to have children they cannot support, and yet these uneducated poor folk keep having them because the government failed in their duty to educate them on a very important matter that is standard and basic in other countries.
I'm sure the previous argument that it is corruption rather than the lack of reproductive education, that causes this cycle of poverty will resurface. This is an absolute falsehood and should not be believed by intelligent forumers. No matter how well a country is run, no matter how intelligent the leaders and how incorruptible they are, a family with seven mouths to feed is going to be an enormous and unsustainable burden on their family and the country at large. Even if we had great public schools, imagine the huge taxpayer expense that is going to be incurred by ordinary workers just to get these kids through school and provide them all the socialized benefits that our government is mandated to provide under law. How is this fair to taxpayers who are responsible enough to have smaller families? They will pay higher taxes and subsidize families who are either ignorant of the costs of having too many children or uncaring of the resultant burden on society. Add to this insult the fact that larger families will have the benefit of enjoying larger tax deductions, while those who are single or have fewer children will have to pay more taxes, and you have a clearly unjust and inequitable result! I thought God-fearing men and women were for justice, but apparently not.
This whole RH bill fiasco is a paranoia made up by the Catholic Church because children are a major source of income to line their pockets, from private schooling in Catholic-run schools, to baptismal, and all other associated revenue streams that depend on more newly-borns entering our already fragile and underfunded socialized institutions.
Last edited by raski; 04-09-2010 at 01:46 PM.
kamo mga ni-uyon sa abortion, maypa lang magpa KAPON moehehee Dah, nganong tuyo-an...
I would say no to the legalization of abortion...Makagaba na..pero Di sad ta ka blame sa mga babayi nga magpakuha tungod kay basin mahimo lang sad nga beggar ug tulisan inig dako kay byaan lang niya sa dan or ipanghatag ilang anak...Depende ra jud na sa circumstance.
Di lang ko ani sugot oi. Di makaya sa akong konsensiya. Siguro kung masulbad ang poverty sa Pilipinas masulbad ra sad ning overpopulation. Kasagaran gud kung kinsa tong naglisod sa panginabuhi mao sad hinuon ang daghan kaayog anak.
Ang abortion nga ako gpasabot kay murag mercy killing ba..,
Sakto gyud ni imong point sir. You hit the nail on the head.
The thread title is very misleading.... obvious kaayo nga bias na daan ang thread starter.
Mannyamador... repeat after me...
RHB is not an abortion bill....
RHB is not an abortion bill....
RHB is not an abortion bill....
agree with you sir.. very good insight..
i would say with regards to what you posted that the catholic church have some communist/socialist social leanings...
so gusto sa simbahan nga kita nga nagtarong og nagpaka responsable mao mo take care sa nagka saup? thats very unfair...
Similar Threads |
|