According to that view, morality is just a product of evolution, right bro?
So I guess what "Moral Zeitgeist" would mean, if it's true, is that morality is a by-product of socio-biological evolution; a sort of social convention or tool that helps the human specie adapt, reproduce and therefore survive. My question is, would that imply that morality is simply subjective and undergoes change over time?
Just to clarify things here:
When I say, the guy is a born genius, it doesn't mean he already got a PHD in theoretical physics the instant he went out of the womb. It means the moment he was born, he has all the potential to become a big hit in the future.
I just hope and pray you can relate that to the we are born sinners thing.
ive see a movie like these before..
where the soldiers torture the enemy to get information which in the end save a lot of their comrade's lives...
which is seen.. the torture? or saving your friend's life?.... if torture is bad, then saving your friend is also bad...
the ends always justify the means...
mau nang dli ta dapat mag dalos2 ug buhat sa usa kbutang
kung para nto sakto ta, para sa uban sayup ta.
sakto ta kai ghuna2 ta sa atong kahimtang
but for others who think sa ilang side pd is sayup ta
we may commit sins, and may not be forgiven by other people
but as long as you, yourself, forgive and nagmahay. then its over.
unsa pmai lalison? na bxg balibalihon pna nmu ang kalibutan
people by nature just think of their own selves
^^^Why? Are we prospering as a species? No we are not and so IMHO your self-centered principles are flawed.
Similar Threads |
|