A question for Christians (mga unbelievers ayaw sa mo'g ti-ti ha. kauban rata. lol)

[regnauld]

---

Human vs. ghostly impregnation

ACT 2:30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;

MAT 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

[kebotDiNaMute]

what makes you believe without a shadow of doubt that the bible is god's word? shouldn't you even be more skeptical if mu tuo mu nga naay yawa?
--- brad, those are entities that serves your morality. Remember imo konsensya will dictate what is right. Naa na sa bible na "it is written in the hearts of men".

ang YAWA
--- he came to steal, kill and to destroy. Brad if you cannot believe on what the bible stories tells you, at least man lang kabalu ka sayop MANGAWAT, SAYOP MO PATAY. dba?

bible is god's word
--- archeological find tells us cities and events are becoming true written in the Bible 2000 years before. It is our standard of morality. Tell me what part of his commandment do you think is not morally right.

[regnauld]

unsa mai nka contradict sa science og bible ani nila bro??

Read and try to analyze using your CRITICAL THINKING! Don't be lazy!

[pinky09]

what makes you believe without a shadow of doubt that the bible is god's word? shouldn't you even be more skeptical if mu tuo mu nga naay yawa?
--- brad, those are entities that serves your morality. Remember imo konsensya will dictate what is right. Naa na sa bible na "it is written in the hearts of men".

ang YAWA
--- he came to steal, kill and to destroy. Brad if you cannot believe on what the bible stories tells you, at least man lang kabalu ka sayop MANGAWAT, SAYOP MO PATAY. dba?

bible is god's word
--- archeological find tells us cities and events are becoming true written in the Bible 2000 years before. It is our standard of morality. Tell me what part of his commandment do you think is not morally right.

[pinky09]

Read and try to analyze using your CRITICAL THINKING! Don't be lazy!

taas kaau bro oie...cite og usa din explain it aron mkasabot ko.plz

[regnauld]

CRUEL, UNMERCIFUL, DESTRUCTIVE, and FEROCIOUS or KIND, MERCIFUL, and GOOD:

"I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy." (JER 13:14) "Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not, but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling."

"The Lord is very pitiful and of tender mercy." (JAS 5:11)
"For his mercy endureth forever." (1CH 16:34)
"The Lord is good to all, and his tender mercies are over all his works." (PSA 145:9)
"God is love." (1JO 4:16)

Isn't that GREAT CONTRADICTION?

Now how do you reconcile a cruel unmerciful God to an infinite loving GOD?

[kebotDiNaMute]

Human vs. ghostly impregnation

ACT 2:30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;

MAT 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

WikiAnswers - Whose blood line connect Jesus to King David - Joseph or Mary

Answer

They both did. At the end of the Book of Numbers an interesting loophole emerged. A man died without a son, leaving 4 daughters. They came to Moses complaining that they would lose the family land since there was no son to inherit it. Moses sought the Lord Who decreed that if there was no son in a family daughters could inherit family land providing they married within their own tribal clan. In effect they had to marry a cousin to keep the land in the "family." This made sense since land was allotted first by tribe then by clan then by family. Marrying within the clan kept the families in close proximity and preserved the tribal allotment. (Num. 36 1:13)
Now compare the 2 genealogies of Jesus in Matthew 1:1-17 and Luke 3:23-38, and you'll discover that Mary and Joseph were both of the tribe of Judah and descendants of David. Joseph descended through Solomon, the royal but cursed line, while Mary's line was through Solomon's brother Nathan.
Here's the tricky part. Mary had no brothers, and so was entitled to inherit her family's land as long as she married someone also descended from David. Joseph fit the bill and being in the royal line had a claim to the throne, but carried the blood curse. No biological son of his could ever legally qualify as Israel's king, but Joseph could secure Mary's right of inheritance.
When Mary accepted Joseph's offer of marriage she preserved her family's land and also made good her son's claim to the throne of Israel. Jesus was in the royal succession through Joseph but escaped the curse since he wasn't Joseph's biological son. But He was a biological descendant of David's through his mother and therefore of the "house and lineage of David."
This whole issue revolves around the facts that a) God has bound Himself to His own laws and b) He keeps His word; facts that should give you great comfort. God is not a man that He should lie, nor a son of man that He should change His mind (Num. 23:19). Legally, a virgin birth was required to produce a sinless man who would be qualified and able to serve as our Kinsman Redeemer, and God longed to redeem us. A virgin birth was also required to sidestep the blood curse on the royal line, fulfilling God's promise to David that a biological descendant of his would sit on the throne of Israel forever.



kinsay na sayop reg? hmmmm...

[pinky09]

r u xur bro nga c God ang ngsugo anah??kai naa rabai uban mubasa din ila tuo c God ng sugo..pagread sa lain na verse ky dli d.i..or bsn naa nai sumpay na naai reason nganung ing.ana na

[kebotDiNaMute]

CRUEL, UNMERCIFUL, DESTRUCTIVE, and FEROCIOUS or KIND, MERCIFUL, and GOOD:

"I will not pity, nor spare, nor have mercy, but destroy." (JER 13:14) "Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not, but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling."

"The Lord is very pitiful and of tender mercy." (JAS 5:11)
"For his mercy endureth forever." (1CH 16:34)
"The Lord is good to all, and his tender mercies are over all his works." (PSA 145:9)
"God is love." (1JO 4:16)

Isn't that GREAT CONTRADICTION?

Now how do you reconcile a cruel unmerciful God to an infinite loving GOD?

Now how do you reconcile a cruel unmerciful God to an infinite loving GOD?
--- simple.
--- for the wages of sin is death (CRUEL).
--- Jesus came to die for your sins (LOVING)

so next?

[regnauld]

Now how do you reconcile a cruel unmerciful God to an infinite loving GOD?
--- simple.
--- for the wages of sin is death (CRUEL).
--- Jesus came to die for your sins (LOVING)

so next?

hahahaha! Define sin and has it something to do with the cruelty of your GOD thats why God killed people including children in the old testament? Use your CRITICAL THINKING here master!