Tinuod ba may porgatoryo?

[dartzed]

---

Jerome (340-420 A.D.) reluctantly inserted Judith, Tobit, the Additions to Esther, and the Additions to Daniel into his Latin Vulgate after some "friendly" pressure. The rest of the apocryphal books were added to the Vulgate after his demise.

kinsa lagi nag.ingon?..

According sa passage which is messianic in nature mo Rule daw ang Messiah for 400 Years after ana ( which the end of age or time ) mamatay ang Messiah ug tanan mga katawhan.

Saon mamatay diay ang Ginoo sa Roman Catholics lahi diay na inyoha Ginoo.

Naunsa mani si mam dartzed e deny jud niya ang tinood nga mao mana nakasulti sa inyoha Bible

ah okies i get it hmmmm giallow naba sa RC ang 2 esdra?.. sa ako nabaw.an there are 3 parts of esdra ug ang 1 esdra palang ang giallow sa RC just like maccabees 1,2,3,4 only 1 and 2 are being used sa RC others kay still being studied paman until now(correct me if im wrong bcn ila nsad giend)..

[amingb]

kinsa lagi nag.ingon?...

Basa lang sa mga Encyclopedia mam dartzed naa daghan diha reference.

ah okies i get it hmmmm giallow naba sa RC ang 2 esdra?.. sa ako nabaw.an there are 3 parts of esdra ug ang 1 esdra palang ang giallow sa RC just like maccabees 1,2,3,4 only 1 and 2 are being used sa RC others kay still being studied paman until now(correct me if im wrong bcn ila nsad giend)..

Part jud na sa Apocrypha ..... Basin ilaha napod tangtangon ...

[dartzed]

Basa lang sa mga Encyclopedia mam dartzed naa daghan diha reference.

Part jud na sa Apocrypha ..... Basin ilaha napod tangtangon ...

these are the list of deuterocanonical texts that are not in you bible The books of

1. Baruch
2. Tobit
3. 1 Maccabees
4. 2 Maccabees
5. Judith
6. Sirach
7. Wisdom

ang ato gistoryaan is purgatory layo na au ang aphocryphal books.. i stand corrected wala d i giapil ang book of 1-3 esdra..

[amingb]

these are the list of deuterocanonical texts that are not in you bible The books of

1. Baruch
2. Tobit
3. 1 Maccabees
4. 2 Maccabees
5. Judith
6. Sirach
7. Wisdom

ang ato gistoryaan is purgatory layo na au ang aphocryphal books.. i stand corrected wala d i giapil ang book of 1-3 esdra..

a. The Wisdom of Solomon (30 B.C.), known as the Book of Wisdom
b. Ecclesiasticus (132 B.C.), also known as Sirach
c. Tobit (200 B.C.)
d. Judith (150 B.C.)
e. 1 Maccabees (110 B.C.)
f. 2 Maccabees (110 B.C.)
g. Prayer of Azariah (100 B.C.) placed as Daniel 3:24-90
h. Susanna (100 B.C.) placed as Daniel 13
i. Bel and the Dragon (100 B.C.), placed as Daniel 14
j. Baruch (150-50 B.C.), placed as Baruch 1-5
k. Letter of Jeremiah (300-100 B.C.) placed as Baruch 6
l. Additions to Esther (140-130 B.C.), placed as Esther 10:4-16:24

suppose to be wala ni labot sa inyoha Bible

m. 1 Esdras (150-100 B.C.), also known as 3 Esdras
n. 2 Esdras (150-100 B.C.), known as 4 Esdras
o. Prayer of Manasseh (100 B.C.)

While there are 15 total books in the Apocrypha, Roman Catholic Bibles count only 11 because they combine the Letter of Jeremiah with Baruch and omit 1 and 2 Esdras and the Prayer of Manasseh

But 2 Esdras is found some catholic bible ( Good News Bible 1979 version )


Mam Dartzed na abot ta sa Apocrypha because all i want to show is The Purgatory And The Praying of the Dead Doctine is a wrong doctrine since that concept was base on 2 Maccabees which is an Apocryphal Books.

[necrotic freak]

okay na bro wrong lagi mi ug kamo correct...

[amingb]

okay na bro wrong lagi mi ug kamo correct...

Parihas raman unta ang Bible sa una before the Council of Trent pero accordingly puede ka mo basa anang Apocrypha pero dili puede himoon doctrina. Part na sa gi Translate ni St. Jerome sa Vulgate pero separate siya not a Part of the Canon. Pero gi Canonize na sa Roman Catholic 1500 Years Later.

The Apocrypha were formally canonized by the Roman Catholic 'Church' on April 8, 1546 A.D. at the Council of Trent.

Naa pajud info nga si Martin Luther during sa iyaha pag rebel sa Roman Catholic the Apocrypha is not Yet Canonized, that is why its been canonized to suppressed the struggle of Martin Luther.

[necrotic freak]

That is why we are wrong.. and the catholic church is not a christian church.. headbang nalang ko bro oi.

[amingb]

That is why we are wrong.. and the catholic church is not a christian church.. headbang nalang ko bro oi.

hehehehe .... angayan kaau ka headbang bro kay taas man kaau ka buhok .... bawal biya na taas buhok bro its a disgrace biya sa mga lalaki unya its a beauty sa mga babayi ..... mag headbang sab ko bro ...


OT

[makal34]

ngano man lgi ang una na mga taw kay long hair man...

[amingb]

ngano man lgi ang una na mga taw kay long hair man...

Wala pa siguro sa una Barbershop bro .... hehehehe OT

“Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory?” (1 Cor. 11:14-15)